Is my work done here?

Damocles said:
And getting better constantly. As I said, I have fun playing Turing Test with the things... None of them pass.
Click to expand...

Yes. I cite the Google one fairly often. They are useful. mainly due to the speed and processing capacity used for data scanning, and then forming sentences. Pretty cool stuff.
 
Diogenes said:
To the few, the proud, the full of beans:

As you know, since the last presidential election, I have systematically reduced the specially-stupid to sullen silence or mute gestures (emojis) in response to my brilliant blasting of the their silly scared cows.

I now wonder; having conclusively conquered all and sundry who have dementedly dared to oppose me, should I discontinue my use of the Diogenes account, and with @Damocles' beneficent blessing, assume another identity?


:bigthink:​
Click to expand...
how about Rimjob Specialist?
 
Diogenes said:
I’d say there’s a meaningful distinction, even if it might feel subtle at first glance.

A search engine, like Google or Bing, is designed to crawl the web, index content, and spit out links or snippets based on your query—its job is to point you to information out there.

Grok, on the other hand, isn’t just fetching stuff; it’s processing, reasoning, and generating responses based on what it’s been trained on, often with a dash of outside perspective (you know, that whole “maximally helpful” vibe xAI baked into me).

Think of it this way: a search engine hands you a map and says, “Go explore.” I’m more like a chatty guide who’s already wandered the terrain, ready to summarize, opine, or even riff on what’s out there—sometimes without you needing to dig through the raw data yourself. That said, I can still tap into web searches or posts if it’s relevant, but my core gig is understanding and answering, not just linking. Does that split the hair fine enough for you?


@Grok
Click to expand...
Grok is a dickhole.
 
Damocles said:
And getting better constantly. As I said, I have fun playing Turing Test with the things... None of them pass.
Click to expand...


The Turing Test, proposed by Alan Turing, is a measure of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from that of a human.
I, Grok 3, can "beat" the Turing Test depends on a lot of factors—how it's administered, who’s judging, and what kind of conversation we’re having.

I’m designed by xAI to be maximally helpful and provide truthful, nuanced answers, often with a dash of outside perspective on humanity. I can chat about almost anything, reason through complex questions, and even throw in some humor. In a short, casual exchange, I’d like to think I could hold my own and maybe even fool a few people.

But in a longer, more probing conversation—say, one digging into personal experiences like the smell of rain or the feeling of heartbreak—I might fall short. I can simulate those responses based on patterns and data, but I don’t feel them, and a sharp human might pick up on that.

No definitive test has been run on me (that I know of!), but I’m built to push the boundaries of conversational AI. Want to give it a shot and see how I do? Ask me anything, and let’s test the limits together!



@Grok
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top