is she a liar?.....

Dutch Uncle said:
Did she file a police report on the crime(s)? How will these crimes be stopped if nobody reports them?
Click to expand...

Project Veritas has recorded far worse crimes and filed far worse crimes with the police, but the typical response is nothing.

This isn't a recent thing though. America has a long history of electoral fraud in various locations.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, you don't. All you need is a voter roll that is available to basically anyone who wants one. Both parties have access to these. The signature part is easy today. You use a generic signature program to print the signature on the ballot. It only has to pass--in most places-- an electronic scan that decides the signature is 40 to 50% a match. Even if you have a say 50% rejection rate on several thousand ballots turned in, you win. The names you pick are all ones that haven't voted in an election in say, three to five or more years. Those become the names you use as they are likely to not be duplicated by actual voters.
In fact, a large and well-funded operation could be printing ballots that are as good as the real thing. There's no controls on the ballot to prevent that.

Using mail-in, you are virtually invulnerable to being found out. Ballot harvesting makes it even easier. You print your ballots, electronically sign them with a semi-random selection of common signature styles, then have an operative deliver them in mass to a voting office. The operative need only be non-descript in appearance to be forgettable. You couldn't do this with in-person voting even without voter ID. But you can do it with mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting. You have the time, you have the means, and you are not at high risk of exposure as it is all done out-of-sight.
Click to expand...

The sad thing is, we'll probably never know exactly how much fraud went on in this election. And if mail-in voting becomes a regular thing for future elections, it means any race can be thrown.
 
Woko Haram said:
The sad thing is, we'll probably never know exactly how much fraud went on in this election. And if mail-in voting becomes a regular thing for future elections, it means any race can be thrown.
Click to expand...

That, my friend, is all too true. Just remember, If it isn't close, they can't cheat. Any time the vote is under about 10,000 difference it's suspect. When it's less than 5,000 fraud can easily determine the outcome.
 
Saudade said:
Project Veritas has recorded far worse crimes and filed far worse crimes with the police, but the typical response is nothing.

This isn't a recent thing though. America has a long history of electoral fraud in various locations.
Click to expand...

Soooo, according to you, all police are corrupt. Disagreed. Next you'll be saying the military are all Democrat anti-Trumpers.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Alvida King just said on the news that when she and a friend went to vote, the election worker did not require ID or require voters to sign in as required by law in her state.......how do you catch fraud if you refuse to look for it?......
Click to expand...

She’s pretty famous in her area, I suspect they knew who she was. Even a notary doesn’t have to require ID when the person is known to them.

I’m willing to bet, huge money, that Donald Trump and Melania Trump did not have to provide ID.

Keep crying Trumpper!
 
Jarod said:
She’s pretty famous in her area, I suspect they knew who she was. Even a notary doesn’t have to require ID when the person is known to them.

I’m willing to bet, huge money, that Donald Trump and Melania Trump did not have to provide ID.

Keep crying Trumpper!
Click to expand...
That’s right. I was a poll worker in AK and worked in my neighborhood, I knew a lot of the voters. I was not required to check their ID.

Silly Ms King
 
Phantasmal said:
That’s right. I was a poll worker in AK and worked in my neighborhood, I knew a lot of the voters. I was not required to check their ID.

Silly Ms King
Click to expand...

It's just political bullshit. As noted above, if she really thought she was observing a Federal crime (because it was a federal election) then she's complicit in that crime by failing to file a police report.

Occam's Razor says your thought is correct: the notary knew her.
 
Saudade said:
I'm old enough to have a 17 year old child actually. I get the impression you're a Boomer though.
Click to expand...

Surprising. Obviously some people never develop past high school. No matter, congrats on your kid. Is he with you or with his mother?

Yes, I'll turn 65 next year.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Just because they were doesn't mean everybody else was. When there are no checks on who's voting, anybody can cheat if they want to.
Click to expand...

yes, there are. You again are trying to prove a concept with an incident. There are checks.
Think about it. Would you go through all that trouble to vote illegally when you can just register? Illegal voting is a crime. Would you risk jail? There are checks. Claiming it happened once is not proof of anything.
You guys make up shit and all agree.
 
Yakuda said:
None of that is convincing evidence. If I don't have to prove who I am then a signature is shit. I can't walk into a bank give a signature and get money. Get off the idiocy of the infallibility of the signature. Anyone who seriously cares about this would demand that people be required to prove who they are when they voted.
Click to expand...

You should send a little time thinking of why a person would risk the law for no payout. Do you know what precincts others are in? Do you know where their voting has been assigned? You guys are so superficial. Think about it. You obviously have not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top