Is the alleged GOP's war on women a false liberal boogeyman?

That's really rich, coming from you, who can't tell the difference between their and there.


You don't know the difference between HERE and there.....now thats extra dumb.....:palm:

(and don't forget they're)


You're so cute when you get desperate and turn grammar Nazi.....
 
Last edited:
You don't know the difference between HERE and there.....now thats extra dumb.....:palm:


You're so cute when you get desperate and turn grammar Nazi.....

No, just simply pointing out your retardation, amongst all these good "learned" folk.
 
No, just simply pointing out your retardation, amongst all these good "learned" folk.


So long as you realize that only those idiots that can't measure up in a real debate, lacking any adequate response to a post, get desperate enough to

resort to turning into the dreaded grammar and spelling Nazi over minor and rare spelling mishaps.......

So you've joined Onecell, Rana and Zappa in that 'special' group

now be on the lookout for some punctuation errors too.......
 
liar. if, i repeat if, you actually gave cites last week, i didn't ignore them. that is what you do.

the reality is, you messed up here. you can't support your claims, so you will just stick to ad homs. if you're going to make claims, be prepared to back them up and don't get pissy when you're asked to support them. comparing your claims to kerry's loss is truly laughable. this shows what a huge hack you are. your claims are no where near as known as kerry's loss. not only is your comparison laughable, it is downright dishonest.

Oh - denial. What a shock.

You kept asking for "cites" where you were defending ol' bravs here. I gave you 2 posts, and you said I was ignoring your request for "cites," so you kept asking for "cites."

It was truly strange. A new nadir of stupidity and denial for you.

And try doing some research. I mean, here you are, trying to discuss the GOP & women's issues...aren't you even the least bit curious about their history with regard to the issues I mentioned? Did they oppose family leave? Did they try to redefine rape? Did they want to cut Head Start?

I think you know the answers on all of those, but you'll continue to distract by demanding "cites", and then ignoring or discrediting them if I link anything. Frankly, I don't care about educating you. It's already clear as day that you don't know shite about it, and once again, you're in WAY over your head, and just shooting from the hip.
 
Try having a grown up explain the post to you.....

you really need some remedial help with reading comprehension.....
--------------

You didn't do that, did you?

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
YOU DID obviously miss this part....gender is not the relevant criteria ?

Sure, bravs. Try asking single mothers if they think Head Start is an important issue to women, and then give them your "relevant criteria" distinction.

I swear - you are braindead beyond belief. I don't have a clue how you get through life.
 
onceler still can't back up his claims

yawn

Translation: I just got my arse handed to me, and I don't know shite about women's issues, yet here I am, still trying to start threads about it & apologizing for the GOP.

Because the latter is what I really do best....
 
lol...onceler can't back up his claims and this means that i got my ass handed to me

TFF...you are such a cute little hack onceler. the onceler debate tactic:

when you can't back up your claims, claim the other person gets their ass handed to them.

LOL
 
lol...onceler can't back up his claims and this means that i got my ass handed to me

TFF...you are such a cute little hack onceler. the onceler debate tactic:

when you can't back up your claims, claim the other person gets their ass handed to them.

LOL

Yeah - you definitely got your ass handed to you. Because everyone else reading this thread knows exactly what the history of the GOP is on the issues I mentioned.

Only you & your neophyte idiocy do not. It's amazing. You're here, proudly proclaiming your ignorance and how very new you are to politics, trying to blindly argue issues without any knowledge whatsoever.

What a fool. What a complete moron.
 
So long as you realize that only those idiots that can't measure up in a real debate, lacking any adequate response to a post, get desperate enough to

resort to turning into the dreaded grammar and spelling Nazi over minor and rare spelling mishaps.......

So you've joined Onecell, Rana and Zappa in that 'special' group

now be on the lookout for some punctuation errors too.......

Is that your defense for your lack of spelling and reading comprehension skill(s)???? Pathetic, to say the least.
No, Bravissmo, it's your side that always jumps to calling "us" Spelling and Grammar Nazis, because you're too stupid to know better. When you get the spelling and grammar down, first, then let's attempt debate. First things first, though.
 
I always ask...can we get a better quality conservative on this site? One that knows the issues somewhat, and isn't here just to carry water for Republicans?
 
Yeah - you definitely got your ass handed to you. Because everyone else reading this thread knows exactly what the history of the GOP is on the issues I mentioned.

Only you & your neophyte idiocy do not. It's amazing. You're here, proudly proclaiming your ignorance and how very new you are to politics, trying to blindly argue issues without any knowledge whatsoever.

What a fool. What a complete moron.

lol..."everyone else".... you can't support your claims...so you resort to a logical fallacy.

asking you to back up your claims is not proclaiming ignorance. you are absolutely full of shit. when you think you are right, you cite. when you know you're wrong or lying, you never cite.

you're pathetic. don't bother trying to debate this issue anymore, ever.
 
I always ask...can we get a better quality conservative on this site? One that knows the issues somewhat, and isn't here just to carry water for Republicans?

:lolup:

just because you're a weak liberal hack doesn't mean we don't have quality cons on this site. you're a joke onceler.
 
:lolup:

just because you're a weak liberal hack doesn't mean we don't have quality cons on this site. you're a joke onceler.

Nah - you've embarassed yourself on this thread. It's hilarious & amazing that you have no clue what the GOP history is on women's issues, and then proclaim that the "war on women" is a red herring.

What a fool. You know you're a joke, too; your responses basically claim that it's your biggest insecurity.

Yurt's best debating techniques, not necessarily in this order: cite, yawn, lol. Cite, yawn, lol.

Idjit. Soooooo glad I'm not as dumb as you.
 
Nah - you've embarassed yourself on this thread. It's hilarious & amazing that you have no clue what the GOP history is on women's issues, and then proclaim that the "war on women" is a red herring.

What a fool. You know you're a joke, too; your responses basically claim that it's your biggest insecurity.

Yurt's best debating techniques, not necessarily in this order: cite, yawn, lol. Cite, yawn, lol.

Idjit. Soooooo glad I'm not as dumb as you.

It's a pure cry for attention. Except there is no there there.
 
yuckie feels more like the lawyer he used to claim to be by asking for cites and demanding women dress appropriately in courtrooms. Total fail and fraud.
 
yuckie feels more like the lawyer he used to claim to be by asking for cites and demanding women dress appropriately in courtrooms. Total fail and fraud.

I've never really seen anything like it. Does the idiot not know how to google anything?

It's very simple.
 
Back
Top