you don't know what that phrase means? wow...you are truly senile. why are you still avoiding grown up discussion onceler?
I get loads of grown-up discussion on this board. But not from your pathological idiocy...
you don't know what that phrase means? wow...you are truly senile. why are you still avoiding grown up discussion onceler?
I get loads of grown-up discussion on this board. But not from your pathological idiocy...
thanks for proving you're a liar. it was in response to a claim, not a question as i said. no surprise you wuss out, yet again, on answering the tough questions.
you do this all the time. when you get cornered you play this stupid childish game and run away and focus solely on insults. if you actually tried to discuss this and answer my question, your question would be answered. you keep saying women, but the truth is, only ONE woman was not allowed and it wasn't because she was a woman. you can't cite any other women who were not allowed to testify and that destroys your argument. <-- that is why you wussed out and refuse to answer my question.
Okay...so only one woman wasn't allowed to testify...
How many women actually DID testify?
Onceler takes comfort in the liberal mindset. He gets sexually tickled by the emotional support he receives in this forum.I get loads of grown-up discussion on this board. But not from your pathological idiocy...
thank you.
as far as i know...zero. that doesn't mean they weren't allowed though. thus, you have no proven your claim that "women" were not allowed to testify. only one women was not allowed. there were no teenagers testifying either...using your logic, teenagers were not allowed to testify. there were no native americans that testified, using your logic, they were not allowed to testify.
So you agree that ZERO WOMEN testified during a hearing on contraception...despite the fact that a vast majority of contraceptive devices produced are for WOMEN.
Does that make sense to you?