Yakuda
Verified User
Did walmart create "social services"? Yes or no?you are wrong.
Walmart loves social services so they don't have to pay enough to their employees.
Did walmart create "social services"? Yes or no?you are wrong.
Walmart loves social services so they don't have to pay enough to their employees.
the question is moot.Did walmart create"social services"? Yes or no?
Its moot to people who can't think.the question is moot.
they support it and send their employees to get food stamps in lieu of raises at work.
do people need to eat? yes or no?Its moot to people who can't think.
Is anyone required to work at Walmart? Yes or no?
Yes they need to eat. Tell me now that translates into they must buy their food at Walmartdo people need to eat? yes or no?
You're giving up I see. Smart decision. I am not defending Walmart I'm defending capitalism. Stop buying or working there and see what happens. Your pissing and moaning is not a convincing argument.here you are defending Walmart with full zeal.
LMAO a very well thought out counter argument. Oh btwyou love sucking Walmarts dick.
capitalism would be corporations paying enough.You're giving up I see. Smart decision. I am not defending Walmart I'm defending capitalism. Stop buying or working there and see what happens. Your pissing and moaning is not a convincing argument.
No thats fascism. You shit stains use phrases with no discernible meaning. What's "enough"?capitalism would be corporations paying enough.
you're actually a fascist.
enough means you don't need food stamps, fuckface.No thats fascism. You shit stains use phrases with no discernible meaning. What's "enough"?
Whats that number? So nothing but vague words used by marxists like you to create chaos not solutions. If no one is required to work at Walmart then you're nothing but a loud mouth retardenough means you don't need food stamps, fuckface.
you;re not deep.
right im a marxist because I think Walmart should pay their employees enough to eat.Whats that number? So nothing but vague words used by marxists like you to create chaos not solutions. If no one is required to work at Walmart then you're nothing but a loud mouth retard
What you think is irrelevant.right im a marxist because I think Walmart should pay their employees enough to eat.
you're the fascist for insisting Walmart be allowed to use other peoples money to pay their people.
you fail to recognize the significance of the status quo and what's really happening in the world.What you think is irrelevant.
I'm not insisting any such thing unless you can copy and paste my words, where I said, "Walmart be allowed to use other peoples money to pay their people." You understand what the quotation marks mean right? They mean you have to find where I made the claim inside the quotation marks.
No I just don't fall for low intelligence arguments. If no one is required to work at Walmart then what they pay people is irrelevant. One basic principle of economics not just capitalism is supply and demand. If you choose to work for Walmart at a low wage then that's on you. If people stopped working there Walmart would have a high demand for workers but have short supply. That scenario would encourage them to pay more money. Stop whining about Walmartyou fail to recognize the significance of the status quo and what's really happening in the world.
you view the world through a haze of retarded punditry.
Walmart uses big government to pay it's way in life.No I just don't fall for low intelligence arguments. If no one is required to work at Walmart then what they pay people is irrelevant. One basic principle of economics not just capitalism is supply and demand. If you choose to work for Walmart at a low wage then that's on you. If people stopped working there Walmart would have a high demand for workers but have short supply. That scenario would encourage them to pay more money. Stop whining about Walmart