Litmus
Verified User
he wrote that he was claimed to have done "great works" as well as the claim of resurrection.
He did, but Gandhi could be described as having done 'great works'.
Once again, most of them are suggested to be second-hand accounts directly from the people who were there. Suggesting that every news story must have a participant write it or it could never be "evidence" is simply ridiculous.
Not claiming that. Just explaining why I would call them dubious...
Selective questioning.