It will cost the taxpayer nothing!

Jarod said:
Refusal to discuss the topic is very telling.
Click to expand...
I have discussed it. I don't care. It is 0.01% of the federal budget. Do you think it is going to bankrupt us?

What exactly is your problem with it? You don't think a ballroom is necessary for Presidents to entertain? You think it is good that the United States has porta potties for dignataries?

What exactly is your beef?

Or is it the 47th Amendment kicking in?
 
Teflon Don said:
You are saying Damo is lying? Take it up with him. He already responded.

Why are you starting duplicate threads about the same topic?

Running out of 47th Amendment topics?
Click to expand...
People are citing his comment, but I do not think it is true. Lying implies intent, I doubt it was intent. Likely it was his opinion. I did ask him to back it up, no response.
 
Teflon Don said:
I have discussed it. I don't care. It is 0.01% of the federal budget. Do you think it is going to bankrupt us?

What exactly is your problem with it? You don't think a ballroom is necessary for Presidents to entertain? You think it is good that the United States has porta potties for dignataries?

What exactly is your beef?

Or is it the 47th Amendment kicking in?
Click to expand...
I think a ballroom is a great idea, it should be done according the established procedure for historical buildings, and nobody should lie about who is funding it.
 
The taxpayers owned an East Wing. trump destroyed it, with lots of the expensive equipment still in it. When will trump be paying us for the damage he ordered?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top