eye witness dumbfuck
The indictment alleges the fights offered purses as high as $26,000, and that Vick once paid $23,000 to the owner of two pit bulls that had beaten Bad Newz Kennels dogs.
That owner is one of four cooperating witnesses cited in the document.
OWNED LIKE A MOFO....
The feds could indict a chicken sandwich and coerce about anyone to say what they want them to say, ESPECIALLY if they themselves are facing charges.
According to you, a trial isn't neccesary. After all, there's an indictment, which you appear to believe is the same thing as a guilty verdict.
The case against Vick hangs on the testimony of the 4 "eyewitnesses" you sopke of. All 4 have been themselves heavily involved in dogfighting.
The most "compelling" testimony against Vick is that of one of the serial dogfighters who said he won $26,000 from Vick and witnessed him shelling out the dough. But he said he arraigned the fight with someone else and never spoke to Vick. I wonder what Vick's lawyer's will find out about the character of this witness and the other 3 under examination?
How about this "damning" evidence .. "“In or about
2003-2006, Vick was personally consulted and gave permission for a dog to be executed by hanging,” .. WOW, that's specific.
The entire case against Vick is based on the testimony of 4 people of questionable character .. and I wonder how many are "testifying" to escape criminal charges themselves?
Four cooperating witnesses are mentioned in the indictment, none of whom are identified "I was surprised by the number of confidential witnesses," says William Frick, an attorney in South Carolina who in 2004 successfully prosecuted David Ray Tant, at the time considered the No. 2 dogfighter in the United States. "In drug cases, people talk all the time. But in dogfighting cases people don't talk unless you've got them over a barrel. You can have the dogs and all the equipment, but a guy can say he is just a breeder. Getting that witness is key."
I wonder what that "barrel" is.
Let me guess .. you thought, as I did, that those involved in the Duke rape case deserved their day in court before being convicted by an uniformed public opinion?
