It's Not The End, It's Not The Beginning Of The End, It's The End Of The Beginning!!!

It's really sad that you're ok with Trump's crimes, but not ok with Obama's crimes.
If you cared about America, you wouldn't want any presidential crimes.

Trump committed no crimes except in lefty imaginations. Mueller said so.

100% innocent. No indictments

But you wait until Trump declassifies Carter Page FISA warrant.
 
Trump committed no crimes except in lefty imaginations. Mueller said so.

100% innocent. No indictments

But you wait until Trump declassifies Carter Page FISA warrant.

Mueller said Trump tried, but failed, to collude and obstruct justice.
A guy who tries to rob a bank but accidentally shoots himself is still a criminal.
 
Mueller said Trump tried, but failed, to collude and obstruct justice.
A guy who tries to rob a bank but accidentally shoots himself is still a criminal.

Muller's & Democrat's bank robbery ended up shooting themselves in the foot, huh?
 
https://www.citizensforethics.org/press-release/new-report-trump-appears-to-have-committed-multiple-crimes/

I think it's especially sad that we now know Trump tried to collude with Russia, but failed to because of his own incompetence, and that's good enough for Trumpcucks to call him innocent.
It would be like if Stalin tried to execute someone and accidentally shot himself, then people saying he was innocent because he didn't pull off the execution.

Mueller spent two years with unlimited resources and found nothing. So you link to a conspiracy site. Pitiful.
 
But what crime has she gotten away with?

Seriously??? You have to ask? Are you being purposefully stupid or really are that stupid.

She used a private e-mail server to conduct her business away from the light of public scrutiny. A violation of federal law.

Then, when she was caught, she lied about it. She had classified e-mails on that server, a violation of Federal law.

She destroyed evidence while under subpoena. You idiots on the left are clamoring for Trumps head for ZERO crimes snowflake.

Which leaks were illegal? Shouldn't the American public be aware of what the team found?

Stop being a mentally retarded asshat; you cannot leaf information of a potential criminal investigation you moron. Grow an IQ.
 
Mueller said Trump tried, but failed, to collude and obstruct justice.
A guy who tries to rob a bank but accidentally shoots himself is still a criminal.

It was a BULLSHIT claim. You don't think a President can succeed in shutting down an investigation into something that is NOTHING? It isn't illegal either snowflakes. It isn't obstruction because....what for it......NO CRIME.
 
Word is, William Barr, Attorney General has already instituted an investigation into the Obama Justice Department’s & FBI’s spying into the Donald J. Trump’s campaign for the Presidency. Word is Barr is waiting patiently but excitedly for the Inspector General’s report on Obama’s Justice Department’s abuse of the FISA Warrant system that generated the FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign ...

Seems like you know the answer already. :)

The alleged "spying on the Trump campaign" (if that's what it was) started months before the election, when few people expected Trump to win. What was the purpose of it? What did they find out? Did they use it to assist Hillary in some way? If so, HOW?

You guys have only got half a conspiracy theory here. I don't think Barr is so stupid.
 
1st DEEP STATER: We all know that creep doesn't have a hope of winning in November. But just in case he does, we're gonna spy on his campaign and say we're invesigating Trump-Russia collusion. BO knows all about it.

2nd DEEP STATER: But Trump isn't colluding with Russia! Look, if it was me running their election-meddling operation, I sure as hell wouldn't confide in Donny Bigmouth, would you? Those Russians aren't dumb, you know.

1st DS: Hell, I know that! This is gonna be a fake investigation but with real spying. You could call it, I dunno, an "insurance policy" just in case he looks like winning. But he won't win, so nobody will hold us to account, see? Are you in?

2nd DS: Er ...
 
Seems like you know the answer already. :)

The alleged "spying on the Trump campaign" (if that's what it was) started months before the election, when few people expected Trump to win. What was the purpose of it? What did they find out? Did they use it to assist Hillary in some way? If so, HOW?

You guys have only got half a conspiracy theory here. I don't think Barr is so stupid.

We know liberals are stupid. After discovering that the Mueller report was not the end of the Trump Presidency and eating a LOT of CROW for their asinine predictions, they double down and now declare obstruction to be their cause.

The Party of the Jackass and liberal media in this country lack the IQ to know when to just STFU. We have Trump to thank for exposing the ROT and decay of the leftist ideology that is determined to turn this nation into a Fascistic third world shit hole.
 
1st DEEP STATER: We all know that creep doesn't have a hope of winning in November. But just in case he does, we're gonna spy on his campaign and say we're invesigating Trump-Russia collusion. BO knows all about it.

2nd DEEP STATER: But Trump isn't colluding with Russia! Look, if it was me running their election-meddling operation, I sure as hell wouldn't confide in Donny Bigmouth, would you? Those Russians aren't dumb, you know.

1st DS: Hell, I know that! This is gonna be a fake investigation but with real spying. You could call it, I dunno, an "insurance policy" just in case he looks like winning. But he won't win, so nobody will hold us to account, see? Are you in?

2nd DS: Er ...

Funnier still; the moronic narrative claiming that Trump was COLLUDING with Russians and is a ....... wait for it......RUSSIAN agent.

Dumber still; that Trump cheated to beat the corrupt, lying cheat Hillary. :laugh:

No one does moron better than the left snowflake. NO ONE.
 
It was a BULLSHIT claim. You don't think a President can succeed in shutting down an investigation into something that is NOTHING? It isn't illegal either snowflakes. It isn't obstruction because....what for it......NO CRIME.

Trying to shut down an investigation, even if it is a bullshit investigation, is still an attempt at obstructing justice.
 
Trying to shut down an investigation, even if it is a bullshit investigation, is still an attempt at obstructing justice.

No one tried to shut down anything you dishonest hack. The investigation was unhindered, unencumbered and anticlimactic. You really need to move on and stay on your medication.
 
WRONG; it was unhindered because Trump allowed it to be.

Democrats subpoena former White House counsel Don McGahn

House Democrats have subpoenaed former White House counsel Don McGahn for his testimony before the committee and for documents related to their investigation into obstruction of Justice by President Donald Trump.

"Following the scheduled testimony of Attorney General William Barr on May 2, 2019 and the expected testimony of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, which we have requested, the Committee has now asked for documents from Mr. McGahn by May 7, and to hear from him in public on May 21," House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler said in a statement.

An attorney for McGahn did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House didn't return ABC News' request for comment.

ABC News previously reported that McGahn was among the White House staffers who were against any notion of President Trump’s firing of special counsel Mueller last June when the president wanted to do just that, a source said.

After news broke that Trump ordered McGahn to fire the special counsel, Trump pressured McGahn to deny that he had been directed to do so ... Mueller concludes that there is evidence to suggest Trump acted this way to impede his investigation, according to the special counsel's report.

Mueller concluded that "Substantial evidence indicates that in repeatedly urging McGahn to dispute that he was ordered to have the Special Counsel terminated, the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn's account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny of the President's conduct towards the investigation."

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hou...ubpoena-white-house-counsel/story?id=62561458

We'll see what McGahn says.
 
Back
Top