It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

Into the Night said:
You can't blame your problems on me, Void. You are still ignoring Title 8. I already know you have nothing more to add, since you are insisting on repetitively trying to pivot to something else.

You can't resolve your OWN ignorance, it seems! :laugh:
Click to expand...
I'm not ignorant of Title 8. You choose to ignore other relevant information because it doesn't reinforce what you want to believe.
 
Into the Night said:
It says no such thing, Void.

It says no such thing, Void.

Random phrase ignored.

Unconstitutional, and unenforceable.

So?

You should probably read these two amendments again:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This amendment applies ONLY TO CONGRESS (and therefore the rest of the federal government). It does NOT apply to State governments or city and county governments. This amendment does not confer any right.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

This amendment discusses two related inherent rights:
1. The right of a State to defend itself. It does this by forming militias.
2. The right of the people to defend themselves (individuals). They do this by bearing Arms (weapons). That means ANY KIND OF WEAPON, including ANY KIND OF GUN.

This amendment does not confer any right. It PROHIBITS the federal and state governments from infringing on this right. This amendment applies to ALL layers of government.

You are also ignoring the State constitutions, which all contain a similar clause, to be applied to the State government as well.


Good for you. Now you finally admit what Title 8 discusses.

Yes it is.

The Constitution does not confer any rights, Void. No piece of paper confers any rights. You are ignoring the 9th amendment again.

Thought terminating cliche. In this case, a fallacy.

You are describing yourself again, Void.

The Constitution of the United is very clear. You just ignore it and despise it.
Title 8 is very clear. You just ignore it and despise it.

Why do you support illegal aliens, the riots, the vandalism, the looters, organized crime, and fighting lawful authority, Void?
Click to expand...
"
This amendment discusses two related inherent rights:
1. The right of a State to defend itself. It does this by forming militias."

Primarily because there was a distrust of having a federal military during peace time, not because of an inherent belief in the need for state militaries.

FYI, there are no well organized state militias.
 
ZenMode said:
"
This amendment discusses two related inherent rights:
1. The right of a State to defend itself. It does this by forming militias."

Primarily because there was a distrust of having a federal military during peace time, not because of an inherent belief in the need for state militaries.
Click to expand...
The federal government has always had a militia as well. They also have the right of self defense. I guess you forgot the army just celebrated it's 250th anniversary.
ZenMode said:
FYI, there are no well organized state militias.
Click to expand...
There certainly is. In Washington, it currently consists of 65 members. These are mostly administrative, in order to active a fighting militia in a short time, should the governor call for it.
 
Into the Night said:
The federal government has always had a militia as well. They also have the right of self defense. I guess you forgot the army just celebrated it's 250th anniversary.
Click to expand...
Wrong. It was disbanded after the revolutionary war in favor of state militias.
Into the Night said:
There certainly is. In Washington, it currently consists of 65 members. These are mostly administrative, in order to active a fighting militia in a short time, should the governor call for it.
Click to expand...
Link?

It makes no sense that the federal government would control a state militia. That defeats the entire purpose of a state militia to protect itself not only from foreign enemies, but the federal government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top