I've been SWATted.

[rjhenn]

3 quotes, 1 thread, zero acknowledgement from you at any point. Perhaps you should pay attention, idiot.

Lastly, people get notified when quoted, so you really have no excuse. In conclusion, suck one.

Basically, you're saying that the threadban software doesn't work.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

Basically, you're saying that the threadban software doesn't work.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

im saying your brain doesn't work.

 

[rjhenn]

im saying your brain doesn't work.

Yours clearly doesn't. I only rarely look at who's quoted me, and then only to find a post that I want to edit. Tapatalk doesn't seem to like editing.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Basically, you're saying that the threadban software doesn't work.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

And Tapatalk does everything using my ID. So if I'm allowed to post where I'm banned, because Legion can't stand honest discussion, it's not my fault, but the fault of the site software. It did block me while I was banned, so Tapatalk doesn't get you around anything.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Basically, you're saying that the threadban software doesn't work.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Do you want to test out the perma-ban feature??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

And Tapatalk does everything using my ID. So if I'm allowed to post where I'm banned, because Legion can't stand honest discussion, it's not my fault, but the fault of the site software. It did block me while I was banned, so Tapatalk doesn't get you around anything.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Just let it keep allowing you and you won't have to worry about the software.

 

[Jack]

Reported! Personal Information!
(that is actual live footage of Mason being arrested)

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

And Tapatalk does everything using my ID. So if I'm allowed to post where I'm banned, because Legion can't stand honest discussion, it's not my fault, but the fault of the site software. It did block me while I was banned, so Tapatalk doesn't get you around anything.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

yes tapatalk (not the site) does not handle threadbans. that's why we aren't super strict on them, but when you are told 3 times to kncok it off and you continue on like a brainless automaton, it's on you. otherwise anyone could just ignore anytime someone points this out to them and say they never saw the post. Again, you get direct notifications when you are quoted. You were actively participating in the thread. Maybe try and be a bit more perceptually aware.

 

[StoneByStone]

You have been banned for the following reason:
avoiding threadbans after being repeatedly informed

Complete and total BS. I'm not aware of any threads that I've been banned from, other than the universal bans that a couple of our more paranoid posters favor. And I've never tried to avoid any such bans. Nor have I ever been "informed" of any such. This all sounds like the usual lies and such that we've all come to expect from USFREEDUMB911, Truth Deflector and that ilk. It looks like I've been SWATted.

USFREEDUMB911 and Truth Deflector are definitely the two angriest trolls here.

 

[Mason Michaels]

I was quoting Diane Chambers on Cheers

 

[/MSG/]

I doubt if you would be so loose with the word if you ever had cancer,cut out of your body.

I doubt you'd be a good judge of what I will or won't do.

 

[/MSG/]

Nothing sweet about telling people to get cancer.

Even as a joke, it's just not cool or funny.

I disagree, I find it hilarious. You should see my Twitter.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

USFREEDUMB911 and Truth Deflector are definitely the two angriest trolls here.

Care to cite examples that support your ASSumption of me, unless you're just once again blowing smoke out of your ass??

 

[Jade Dragon]

3 quotes, 1 thread, zero acknowledgement from you at any point. Perhaps you should pay attention, idiot.

Lastly, people get notified when quoted, so you really have no excuse. In conclusion, suck one.

I don't know why you let people spam the forum anyway. Most forums would find it abusive, even with the freedoms of a free speech forum. It's something that drags down usage of forums. Flanders is doing it worse then anyone, and putting all his political crap in religion, or sports. Does this forum have a bias, in handling these things?

 

[/MSG/]

I don't know why you let people spam the forum anyway. Most forums would find it abusive, even with the freedoms of a free speech forum. It's something that drags down usage of forums. Flanders is doing it worse then anyone, and putting all his political crap in religion, or sports. Does this forum have a bias, in handling these things?

We're biased towards not giving a shit generally. Government governs best when it governs least and all that.

 

[Mason Michaels]

I doubt you'd be a good judge of what I will or won't do.

From experience,I see a immature child.

 

[/MSG/]

From experience,I see a immature child.

Go fuck yourself you whiny dick face.

 

[Jade Dragon]

We're biased towards not giving a shit generally. Government governs best when it governs least and all that.

What does the government have to do with, how you enforce this sites rules?

 

[Mason Michaels]

Go fuck yourself you whiny dick face.

Struck a nerve!lol

 

[rjhenn]

yes tapatalk (not the site) does not handle threadbans. that's why we aren't super strict on them, but when you are told 3 times to kncok it off and you continue on like a brainless automaton, it's on you. otherwise anyone could just ignore anytime someone points this out to them and say they never saw the post. Again, you get direct notifications when you are quoted. You were actively participating in the thread. Maybe try and be a bit more perceptually aware.

Like I said, I never saw any such notifications. And it's the site that needs to handle threadbans, not whatever software the user is using.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk