Jarod says that the immigration ban is unconstitutional; but can't explain why.

Damocles said:
That portion that discusses any person specifically speaks of jurisdiction. People in Iran are not within the jurisdiction of the United States, Jarod. Amendment 14 would not apply here.
Click to expand...

One of them says "within the jurisdiction..." the other does not, it says specifically "ANY PERSON" and leaves out the qualifier "within the jurisdiction." I have posted it a few times lately. Loot it up you will see what I am saying.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
now damn it jarod. I like you but you seriously have to remove your cranium from your sphincter. stop being like most of these other proles and READ the constitution for what it is and what it does.

the US Constitution does not apply itself against the people, it applies itself against the federal government. The US Constitution is what created the federal government and it provided very clear and limited enumerated powers. EVERYTHING ELSE belongs to the people and the states.
Click to expand...

You've just exposed the liberal agenda.
 
Jarod said:
"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Step One...

Lets start with a simple one... Look at this portion of the 14th Amendment. Can you see where the writer discusses "Citizens" in one part and "any person" in another? Do you think that was an accident? Then again later do you see where another category is identified namely "any person within its (the United States) jurisdiction..."

You see, above three different classes of people were discussed and some their of rights as guaranteed under the Constitution were enumerated. Lots of the people listed are not citizens.
Click to expand...
With that argument the US government is a war criminal due to ALL past wars.
 
Celticguy said:
start with a simple one... Look at this portion of the 14th Amendment. Can you see where the writer discusses "Citizens" in one part and "any person" in another? Do you think that was an accident? Then again later do you see where another category is identified namely "any person within its (the United States) jurisdiction



They are not in our jurisdiction, they are where ever beyond our shores they happen to be. At a minimum they would need to be on a military base with a plane and a runway.
Click to expand...

by the way dude.....you need a new avatar......the election is so last year......
 
No non-citizen not on our soil, which includes embassies, military bases and whatnot, enjoy ANY constitutional protections. Oh and don't forget, Obama repealed wet-foot-dry-foot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top