Joe Biden cashed $200,000 check from brother James’ business deal

T. A. Gardner said:
I'd think if there is one, Joke would have made it public immediately to put down any doubt. If nothing comes out on Joke's end then he and his staff are playing the duck and cover, stall, and run out the clock game because it's a train wreck in slow motion.
Click to expand...

Because Joe and his advisors believe anything he could offer to Comer and his derps would get them to engage honestly and say 'ok, it seems this was ok'.

FLOL.

Just because you guys are derps, do not think Joe or anyone watching this clown car ride you guys are on, are also.
 
archives said:
Wrong, why would anyone legitimatize an innuendo, no one can disprove that what which has yet to be proven
Click to expand...

It isn't "innuendo."

in·nu·en·do
[ˌinyəˈwendō]
NOUN
an allusive or oblique remark or hint, typically a suggestive or disparaging one

It is a physical chain of evidence. Jim Biden got $200,000 wire transferred into his account from a corporation he was known to be influence pedaling to. The day after that, Jim wrote Joe a check for $200,000. All of that is hard, factual evidence. That Jim Biden wrote "loan repayment" can't be disputed.

Well, the only thing missing here is the original loan from Joe Biden to his brother. A lack of any physical evidence showing that Joe gave his brother something in the neighborhood of $200,000 as a "loan" would scream that the notation his brother made was pure bullshit meant to cover a money laundering operation.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
My bet is there isn't. Bagman and the rest of the Biden clan used "loan" and "loan repayment" as an explanation for one-way money transfers numerous times. It seems that was their 'go to' fig leaf to cover up the money laundering and bribery going on.
Click to expand...

“My bet” doesn’t make a man guilty, only partisan opinion based upon innuendo, which is all Comer has
 
archives said:
“My bet” doesn’t make a man guilty, only partisan opinion based upon innuendo, which is all Comer has
Click to expand...

It isn't fucking innuendo. Words have meaning, and you aren't using them as they are meant to be used. There is a paper trail here, and there is only one part missing and if it stays missing it shows Joe Biden was part of a money laundering operation.

Joe has to demonstrate that there was an original loan. He received a "loan repayment" of $200,000 from his brother. How hard would it be for him to show he actually loaned his brother that money to begin with? A check, wire transfer, account transfer, something that confirms it was a loan. If nothing like that exists, it's pretty damn obvious that Joe got $200,000 from a corporation laundered through his brother.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It isn't "innuendo."

in·nu·en·do
[ˌinyəˈwendō]
NOUN
an allusive or oblique remark or hint, typically a suggestive or disparaging one

It is a physical chain of evidence. Jim Biden got $200,000 wire transferred into his account from a corporation he was known to be influence pedaling to. The day after that, Jim wrote Joe a check for $200,000. All of that is hard, factual evidence. That Jim Biden wrote "loan repayment" can't be disputed.

Well, the only thing missing here is the original loan from Joe Biden to his brother. A lack of any physical evidence showing that Joe gave his brother something in the neighborhood of $200,000 as a "loan" would scream that the notation his brother made was pure bullshit meant to cover a money laundering operation.
Click to expand...

“evidence” of circumstantial events you, or rather Comer, are trying to pedal as proving something, they don’t, lack substantial proof, confirmation of anything
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It isn't fucking innuendo. Words have meaning, and you aren't using them as they are meant to be used. There is a paper trail here, and there is only one part missing and if it stays missing it shows Joe Biden was part of a money laundering operation.

Joe has to demonstrate that there was an original loan. He received a "loan repayment" of $200,000 from his brother. How hard would it be for him to show he actually loaned his brother that money to begin with? A check, wire transfer, account transfer, something that confirms it was a loan. If nothing like that exists, it's pretty damn obvious that Joe got $200,000 from a corporation laundered through his brother.
Click to expand...
I have loaned my brother money before and there was a check written to him. There should be a money transfer of some sort if Joe lent his brother money unless he gave him a gold bar. :thinking: Menendez style.
 
volsrock said:
And the left will continue to insist that there is no direct evidence because the memo line didn't say "Laundered Kickback Payment."
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: And the right will continue to insist that a loan repayment that occurred when Biden was a private citizen is money laundering.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It isn't fucking innuendo. Words have meaning, and you aren't using them as they are meant to be used. There is a paper trail here, and there is only one part missing and if it stays missing it shows Joe Biden was part of a money laundering operation.

Joe has to demonstrate that there was an original loan. He received a "loan repayment" of $200,000 from his brother. How hard would it be for him to show he actually loaned his brother that money to begin with? A check, wire transfer, account transfer, something that confirms it was a loan. If nothing like that exists, it's pretty damn obvious that Joe got $200,000 from a corporation laundered through his brother.
Click to expand...

Sure it is, it is falsehoods peddled as fact, you have no real confirmation on what the check is other than a loan repayment, you are inferring the rest without any first hand evidence, innuendo
 
christiefan915 said:
Polls?

:facepalm:
Click to expand...

Yup. ExcessLies just confirmed they don't care if it's true or not. They only care how it affects the polls.
The side that tells the biggest lies wins. That's the Republiclowns strategy.

redneck-swimming.jpg
 
christiefan915 said:
:rolleyes: And the right will continue to insist that a loan repayment that occurred when Biden was a private citizen is money laundering.
Click to expand...

Then there should be some proof that Joke actually loaned the money. A check, a wire transfer, or something. Where is it? If Joe ran the payment through his brother to disguise it that would be money laundering.
 
Joe Crapitalist said:
Yup. ExcessLies just confirmed they don't care if it's true or not. They only care how it affects the polls.
The side that tells the biggest lies wins. That's the Republiclowns strategy.

redneck-swimming.jpg
Click to expand...
IDIOT
The corrupt DOJ run by the corrupt Merrick Garland will never indict Joke Bribem so it is up to the voters to speak.

BTW notice Sally is wearing her Democrats blue MooMoo she is definitely a Democrat a Republican would never wear a Democrat blue MooMoo.
 
Last edited:
ExpressLane said:
Then there should be some proof that Joke actually loaned the money. A check, a wire transfer, or something. Where is it? If Joe ran the payment through his brother to disguise it that would be money laundering.
Click to expand...

How about the repugs just haven't uncovered it yet? Or worse, they did find it, realized it was legit but hid the findings in favor of propaganda.
 
ExpressLane said:
This was a transfer of funds for influence that was purchased. Joe "Menendez" Biden was selling his influence. The Biden family is too greedy to fully cover their tracks. We will find more. One more nail in Joe's coffin. That isn't smoke you smell it is bowel gas from my bowels in your nostrils . :laugh: Take a deep breath.
Click to expand...

Let us know when you have anything more than bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top