SmarterthanYou
rebel
and? you're still missing the point........
Joe Bidens job approval rating
- Thread starter Yakuda
- Start date
and? you're still missing the point........
Nope. You idiots are relying on these polls, trying to call them ratings. They’re not.
Ratings, by the pros, put Trump among the worst ever.
Polls? Meaningless to me. I won’t vote for Trump and don’t want Biden to run.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
yet you sit on here weekly, silently cheerleading for biden.............you're so fucking angry about the embarrassment you've endured by voting against trump, that you constantly have to stress about trump being impeached twice, indicted 4 times, orange blimp, going to prison, etc............just to avoid acknowledging that YOU also voted for a racist failure for president
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Biden has the worst poll numbers of any modern president, including Trump. Biden polls worse than Trump. I'd think that's damn hard to do, but Biden seems hell bent on topping his own record of failure daily.
Naw, I’m no Biden cheerleader. He’s doing a decent, but not great, job. He’ll go down as a mediocre president. Doesn’t matter. We currently have no President Trump.
Trump’s track record speaks for itself, Rufus. And it will get nothing but worse for him. But it’s you fucking morons in denial about his history. That’s why you need constant reminders. You have the memory, and intelligence of a fucking goldfish.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
this is another tactic you embarrassed democrats must use.......that of calling all others trumpers if they are not on here bashing trump just as much as you are........needing to draw attention away from knowing you cast a vote for a racist old white man because you hated a racist old white man...........
you're party over principle............probably the worst kind of citizen.
Largely because currently Biden is President, the one in office, while Trump is not, but once the two square off, a match few want to see but inevitable now, Americans will remember Trump being Trump, and the trials plus flashbacks to 1/6 will only hardened that image
Biden’s successes are underreported and under appreciated.
https://www.salon.com/2023/01/20/biden-as-great/
https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-...y-best-president-our-lifetime-opinion-1790604
https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/po...024-campaign-election-democrats-kamala-harris
Seen this dodge hundred times, “I’m not a Trump supporter, in fact I don’t like the guy, but I will vote for him in the primary, and for the fifth time in 2024, but I’m not a Trump guy”
In today’s media, entertainment sells, not facts, people don’t want economic indicators, rather infotainment, and if you can present it as a melodrama, it sells even better regardless of the facts
SmarterthanYou
rebel
do you have any post of mine that says I am voting for him in the primary OR the general election? Because NOBODY has been able to produce one
ExpressLane
Verified User
Remind me how badly did Carter lose the election
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
My bet is, if the two are on stage in a debate, Trump will be his usual bombastic, trolling self and Biden will angerly lose control and go off in a babbling rant. Trump will come away looking like the asshole everybody expected while Biden will look like a senile old fool who is no longer mentally stable.
Not much of a choice hum?
Yakuda
Verified User
Reagan took 44 states and almost 10 million more votes. John Anderson ran that year too if i remember correctly. He was irrelevant. Oh and the day of Reagan's inauguration the Iranian hostages were freed. The muzzies didnt want to tangle with Reagan.
Last edited:
The only part of that that is true is the part about Trump. Biden had just enough outrage in their last debate. He’ll do the same this time.
I cast a vote for the candidate who was not Trump. That simple, Nancy. I’ll do it again, if necessary
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Let's see... Three fluff pieces, two from radical Leftist magazines
The first in Salon, is by a radical Leftist academic named Robert McElvaine. The guy's bibliography of published stuff reads like a who's who of the radical Left. He is supposedly an expert on the history of the US depression. Outside of that, he seems to dabble in radical Leftist academic nonsense. For example, his book Eve's Seed is a mishmash of radical Leftist tripe with a big stripe of Marxist didactic tossed in. The book is praised on the radical Left, but nowhere else.
In his article in Salon, McElvaine opens with a logical fallacy in the form of an appeal to popularity. He then launches into, alternately, apologizing for the failings of past progressive presidents, while providing laundry lists of their programs as if simply passing social-economic justice legislation is a good thing on the basis of idealism. His article is, well, crap.
Next up, we have an opinion piece by a nothing academic in African American Studies who has published such hysteric tripe as this:
For people of color, the next elections could mean life or death and Society nurtures the implicit biases between black men and police
https://aasd.umd.edu/news/dr.-jason...r-next-elections-could-mean-life-or-death-and
"Life or death?" Really? Talk about hyperbolic bullshit...
His Newsweek article is little more than a cheering section for Biden. If you're a radical Leftist / Progressive, you'd probably find it reassuring and agreeable. Anyone else--the other 80% of us, give or take--would shurg and say meh, nothing useful to read here...
Then we have Dylan Matthews, a writer for Vox who's never been outside the radical Leftist / Progressive bubble world judging from his biography. He writes exclusively for radical Leftist publications. He spent some time at Harvard but apparently didn't graduate.
The Vox article cited here is really a well written piece for a high school student. It is long on empty platitudes and opinions and short on facts. At points Matthews destroys his own argument citing issues with Biden he has no fix for.
There’s another risk of a Biden run worth highlighting here: that he doesn’t die in office, but gradually undergoes cognitive decline serious enough to make him unable to serve.
The particular danger of this situation is that it’s not clear-cut. Biden is either alive or dead; he is not, in a binary way, either impaired or non-impaired. It’s a gradient and the change is gradual. We can agree that he seems fine now, and that if he were to start forgetting his own name or that he’s the president, that would be too far. It’s harder to agree at what point between those extremes he should step aside.
I don’t have an especially satisfying answer here...
That is, after lots of drivel he admits that Biden likely isn't fit mentally or health-wise to fill another term but can't figure out a way around that issue. That is, his whole case of why Biden should be reelected was built on a pond of quicksand.
All of it is drivel and repetition of White House talking points. Maybe these writers could actually have a thought of their own rather than just regurgitate the same tired lies and talking points the Joke administration trots out for public consumption.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
He's gotten older and four years in the White House have taken their toll. He's much more prone to snap anger fits these days.
Okay, don’t like those opinions, here’s more
https://scri.siena.edu/2022/06/22/american-presidents-greatest-and-worst/
[FONT="]“Joseph Biden enters the ranking after only a year in office at 19th rated highly on his ability to compromise (9th), court appointments (10th), executive appointments (10th) and integrity (12th) but lower on luck (34th), his relationship with Congress (31st) and his communication ability (30th). “[/FONT]
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
A bunch of mostly, if not entirely, Leftist and radical Leftist academics rate presidents. I really don't want to go through pointing out the absurdities of their ratings for the Nth time...