Then you must know. Second time I ask you: What did I say about fascism that is false?Also, your post assumes Trump is a fascist. You don't know what a fascist is.
Then you must know. Second time I ask you: What did I say about fascism that is false?Also, your post assumes Trump is a fascist. You don't know what a fascist is.
I take it that you can't read.Then you must know. Second time I ask you: What did I say about fascism that is false?
You are a fucking pussy.I take it that you can't read.
You're wasting my time. Your ignornace on fascism causes you to make other false statements, e.g. implications that Trump is a fascist.
Learn what a fascist is, or be relegated to simply being told that your statements are false.
If you are implying that Trump is a fascist, then it's full stop. No one needs to read any further.
False.Propagandists use pictures because their audience is illiterate.
True.False.
No difference. Go back to kindergarten.Someone doesn't know the difference between a "picture" and a Tweet.
You are an undereducated whiner. Sit back down at the kids' table and finish coloring.You are a fucking pussy.
have real contributions, nimnul.Learn English grammar, you dolt.
Well, if Bolton's guilty, let him burn!This one may actually be something and Bolton may be at risk based on the early reporting.
The reporting says this was something the Biden DoJ caught wind of, when Boltons hacked AOL email message (or intercepted?) was exposed to them by a foreign gov't who received it, or something like that.
Now as i understand it, it is not that Bolton has material he is not supposed to have, as Trump did, but that he may have broke a law that says 'if you hold classified or even lower secret material legally you MUST protect it and even accidental loss of control of it is against the law'.
Biden's DOJ decided not to do anything with it and cited they would not want to expose the material he had anyway, in a charge, but Trumps DoJ has proceeded on it.
This law does not require intent and only requires the 'loss of control, accidental or not' and the material is said to be 'secret' but not classified.
nah.Care should be taken......Bolton knows where a lot of the bodies are buried.
logic is Nazi!They just pretend that whatever crime their current propaganda poster has against them are "overreach" regardless of who the poster child is...
They'll pretend that it isn't "defending" Bolton, it's hating Trump! <smh>...
Call it what you want. I suggest you read this book; ignore the title and read all the pages and pages documenting trump's crooked actions with the banks, the casinos, and every other business he had a finger in. And, everything is backed up with proof from those institutions.
![]()
Lucky Loser (book) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Btw, trump filed a $15bn lawsuit against Random House and the NYT for "defamation" but the filing was struck down, and trump has 28 days to refile. So let's just see how far he gets.
![]()
Judge strikes down Trump’s $15bn lawsuit against the New York Times
Judge gives US president 28 days to refile action after saying original filing is full of ‘vituperation and invective’www.theguardian.com
BINGOAre there posts here actually "defending Bolton?"
I'm surprised to see you join in this false argument. Just like w/ Comey and James - most are concerned about EXECUTIVE OVERREACH.
Um... He sent it to two people, who were not allowed to have the TS(SCI) info, according to the indictment. Buck doesn't quite got it right. And yeah, Hillary committed the same crime.
It is hilarious watching JPP leftists defending Bolton. The neocons neocon.
Their TDS knows no limits
I find it interesting that people hate Trump so much that they are willing to defend Bolton at all costs.
This is as interesting to me as the silence from all the "Ceasefire now!" screamers after there is a ceasefire...
Well, if Bolton's guilty, let him burn!