Johnny Football is becoming tougher to stop

[Big Money]

Johnny Manziel, or at least the idea of him, bothers a lot of people in college athletics. Between his off-field behavior, the autograph pseudo-scandal, the on-field antics and the way he has sucked everyone at Texas A&M into his orbit, a trail of resentment – or maybe jealousy – follows Johnny Football.



http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/sec/2013/09/10/alabama-crimson-tide-johnny-manziel-respect/2794075/

 

[The Dude]

Haters gonna hate

 

[Big Money]

Haters gonna hate

True.

 

[Phantasmal]

He better enjoy college ball!

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Some places have a different standard of class.

 

[Big Money]

Some places have a different standard of class.

Yes, apparently.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf--documents--texts-reveal-impermissible-benefits-to-five-sec-players-202513237.html

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Yes, apparently.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf--documents--texts-reveal-impermissible-benefits-to-five-sec-players-202513237.html

Not even close. You think a poor player taking cash is the same as a rich player charging for autographs and showing attitude as Manziel has done. As I said, not even close.

 

[Big Money]

Not even close. You think a poor player taking cash is the same as a rich player charging for autographs and showing attitude as Manziel has done. As I said, not even close.

LOL.

One is a violation. The other?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

LOL.

One is a violation. The other?

Both are violations. Neither has been proven.

 

[Big Money]

Both are violations. Neither has been proven.

But "a poor player taking cash" is morally superior to anything Johnny Football has done?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

But "a poor player taking cash" is morally superior to anything Johnny Football has done?

I think you are trying to move the goal posts. But yes, I think there is something less immoral about a poor player taking cash than a rich player taking it.

 

[Big Money]

I think you are trying to move the goal posts. But yes, I think there is something less immoral about a poor player taking cash than a rich player taking it.

How so?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

How so?

With one there is probably a need. With the other there is not, it is just an "I want".

 

[Big Money]

With one there is probably a need. With the other there is not, it is just an "I want".

So if a poor person steals, it moral, but if a rich person steals, it's immoral?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

So if a poor person steals, it moral, but if a rich person steals, it's immoral?

Once again, not what I said.

 

[Big Money]

Once again, not what I said.

It's not?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

It's not?

No, it is not. Reread what I posted and then reread what you posted.

 

[Big Money]

No, it is not. Reread what I posted and then reread what you posted.

Need good, want bad?

Is that it?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Need good, want bad?

Is that it?

No. I said it was less immoral and you claimed I said it was moral. There is a difference.

 

[Big Money]

No. I said it was less immoral and you claimed I said it was moral. There is a difference.

There are degrees of immorality? Who sets the various standards?