Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
my favorite debate championship was the one where asshat claimed he won when he never actually debated
True. I'd hate to have to defend Dixie as a mathamatical genius.
Maybe Grind can dig it up? It was an all time classic.God oh god I wish I could have seen the original thread.
Again, I would argue that with objective judging that's irrelevent. Debating is not about "being right" or "Having the most right argument.". Formal debate is about who clearly articulates, with reason and logic, the best argument.
A good debator should be able to take any side of any issue, no matter how unpopular or wrong and present a well thought out argument. That is the essential challenge to a debate.
You mean like "Dixie isn't a mathematical genius"?I would argue that one person getting a softball of a position and the other having a much tougher position to debate does put them at a disadvantage. They naturally have a tougher debate on their hands. It's just that simple. One side will have way more points they can bring up than the other.
That doesn't change that some questions are easier to argue than others.
I will be either organizer or judge.
yeah I shouldn't have let that be an open call. I am pre-selecting Mott as a judge. Winterborn seems to be a good judge too. Rana might be able to round it out. Damo would be a good judge but I kinda want him in the debate
rana-mott-winterborn seems like a pretty level headed list.
There's a practical limit to that. You cannot argue certain positions no matter how good a debater you are.
Except you are taking two from the left and one from the middle... plus Mutt is an idiot. Just sayin'... taking a judge from Ohio??? You may as well have a monkey grab some poo and fling it at a dart board with the participants names on it. About the same quality... no offense to poo throwing monkeys.
out of those that have said they would be judge... I would suggest the trio of Rana, Damo and Winter. You cross the political spectrum and I think all three would be fair and impartial.
Oh stop crying. Rana and Wb are extremely impartial and only a whiner would deny that. I think Mott will be too. It's not like Grind made me a judge. Or you!
Dearest Darla... I already stated that Rana and Winter would be good judges. I made the post you quoted to rip on Mutt and make fun of Ohio. It is done in fun, to mock Mutt.
For someone who thinks she can read emotion from typed words, you do tend to miss sarcasm quite consistently. Not bright enough to get it?
Nope Damo is not impartial. Rana and WB yes.
Mott is way more impartial than Damo.
No, I"m sure you're smiling when you write this stuff. Heck, you are probably laughing and slapping your thighs! Ho ho ho. Almost like a message board Santa!
Nope Damo is not impartial. Rana and WB yes.
Mott is way more impartial than Damo.
rana impartial
nothing could be further from the truth.
rana impartial
nothing could be further from the truth.