JPP Lefties Endorse kiddie porn druggie traitor

Here is the opening post again. Thank you to all the lefties who validated it. The attempted exploitation of 12 b REALLY helped illustrate what my opening post is about.

"As I read through thread after thread about Hunter Biden and all the disgusting things on his laptop, every JPP lefty is defending this creep. No JPP lefty has disavowed Hunter or any of the disgusting things he has engaged in. Worse yet, JPP lefties actually shield him by trying to marginalize what Hunter has done. If you watch the outcome of this thread, you will see lefties attempting to protect him."
 
AProudLefty said:
Well I think it's a sarcasm. I could be wrong though but it does look like one to me. We'll let the mods decide. ;)
Click to expand...
Did you read the rule? I don't think so;)
Here you go:
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

But I understand....Let the mods decide;)
 
TOP said:
Did you read the rule? I don't think so;) But I understand....Let the mods decide;)
Click to expand...

The context is clear in the first sentence. The contexts are "disavow lies" and "lies".

Therefore, what he said about the OP was a lie.

Hence the sarcasm.
 
AProudLefty said:
The context is clear in the first sentence. The contexts are "disavow lies" and "lies".

Therefore, what he said about the OP was a lie.

Hence the sarcasm.
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter:)
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
 
TOP said:
Doesn't matter:)
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

The question is where's the line? ;)
 
TOP said:
I understand your "confusion".... Don't fret....Just enjoy your weekend;)
Click to expand...

What confusion? It's clearly a sarcasm. I guess sarcasms are difficult for you.

Anyway, I just reported it for you. I asked the mods if it's a 12b violation.
 
Evmetro said:
I back it up by quoting your very post. Thank you for illustrating what the opening post is about, especially the last sentence. In this thread, I want to show how JPP lefties shield the creep and all the disgusting things he is involved in. I want to show how JPP lefties endorse his selling influence, kiddie porn, and druggie culrure by evading ANY discussion of it. Your post did this perfectly.
Click to expand...

Well, then lay your cards down.
 
Trumpet said:
Well, then lay your cards down.
Click to expand...

Here is what you quoted of me:

Evmetro
I back it up by quoting your very post. Thank you for illustrating what the opening post is about, especially the last sentence. In this thread, I want to show how JPP lefties shield the creep and all the disgusting things he is involved in. I want to show how JPP lefties endorse his selling influence, kiddie porn, and druggie culture by evading ANY discussion of it. Your post did this perfectly.
Click to expand...

Have a look at the bold portion of the quote of my post above, and then tell me how many times JPP lefties disavowed, condemned, or discussed Hunter's druggie culture, kiddie porn, or selling of influence as per the laptop. Keep that number in mind if your reply keeps that tally at zero...
 
Evmetro said:
Have a look at the bold portion of the quote of my post above, and then tell me how many times JPP lefties disavowed, condemned, or discussed Hunter's druggie culture, kiddie porn, or selling of influence as per the laptop. Keep that number in mind if your reply keeps that tally at zero...
Click to expand...

There's no evidence that Hunter Biden is into kiddie porn. This is a bullshit question only being asked to take the focus off of Trump's real scandals, such as promoting dangerous conspiracy theories as recently as a few days ago.

Further more, a few people on JPP, including myself, said that IF Hunter Biden broke the law, he should be put in jail. So aside from this being a totally transparent #deflection, it's one that failed pretty quickly.
 
StoneByStone said:
There's no evidence that Hunter Biden is into kiddie porn. This is a bullshit question only being asked to take the focus off of Trump's real scandals, such as promoting dangerous conspiracy theories as recently as a few days ago.

Further more, a few people on JPP, including myself, said that IF Hunter Biden broke the law, he should be put in jail. So aside from this being a totally transparent #deflection, it's one that failed pretty quickly.
Click to expand...

Stop protecting Hunter the druggie shitbag. You can still tow the lefty line without having to protect creeps like him.
 
StoneByStone said:
Thank you. I think it's important that we all come together as Americans to ensure the Trumpcucks that we will not vote for Hunter Biden.
Click to expand...

I will go one better:

Not only will I pledge not to vote for Hunter Biden. I will also pledge to note vote for the current incumbent who apparently fantasizes about having an improper relationship with his own daughter.
 
Tacomaman said:
I will go one better:

Not only will I pledge not to vote for Hunter Biden. I will also pledge to note vote for the current incumbent who apparently fantasizes about having an improper relationship with his own daughter.
Click to expand...

Well, the Right thinks rape, incest, and child molestation are ok when it's a Republican. So they would probably fight you on that.
 
StoneByStone said:
avatar7380_1.gif
There's no evidence that Hunter Biden is into kiddie porn.
Click to expand...

How do you know?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top