Into the Night
Verified User
Because he's committed impeachable offenses, you silly whore.
...deleted Holy Links...
No, he hasn't, the propaganda sources you are using notwithstanding.
Because he's committed impeachable offenses, you silly whore.
...deleted Holy Links...
Actually, the number of seats the Democrats picked up is far less than usual for an opposing party to pick up seats during a mid-term election.
The are happy. A good economy makes people happy. Trump got government out of the way of large sectors of the economy. He lowered taxes too. He's not attacking the economy like Obama did. He should get credit.
It isn't science at all.
I do. I am also enjoying watching you get your own arguments twisted up.No one buys that you are deriving any joy here.
I don't think you know what that even means.What you're truly convincing people is that you can only resort to posturing to defend the rotten beliefs you hold.
No, he hasn't, the propaganda sources you are using notwithstanding.
No. The poll results show otherwise. You are deluded.Wrong, and the dems won by the highest margins in US history.
...deleted Holy Link...
Since when were the Democrats happy with Trump? I don't need to see a poll for that! You can't use polls as references with me either.But they're not at all happy with Trump, disphit, as the polling data now shows.
But I do know. The election results speak for themselves. You just want to deny them and use propaganda sources.LOL! You wouldn't know in any case.
You can't use The Atlantic as a source with me. Discarded on sight.Yes, silly whore, he has. The Mueller report and his other various scandals all shot that.
...deleted Holy Link...
Thanks for yet another easy win and that you lied.
No. The poll results show otherwise. You are deluded.
Since when were the Democrats happy with Trump? I don't need to see a poll for that! You can't use polls as references with me either.
But I do know. The election results speak for themselves. You just want to deny them and use propaganda sources.
You can't use The Atlantic as a source with me. Discarded on sight.
You did not win. You don't win simply by declaring that you win. It is obvious you don't want to examine the actual election results and instead want to use propaganda sources. Done here.
No, the actual statistical data supports what I stated. It's nothing you'd ever understand.
That also includes non-democrats, dipshit.
And in the last elections, dems scored historic victories, w/Twump's approval rate now sinking even lower than it's been since back then.
Nice to see you make a fool of yourself again.
So you admit you either can't read the words it uses, can't refute what's at the link or are simply a meth addict. OK.
Inversion fallacy. Thanks for admitting I won.
Nice owning you.
Argument from randU fallacy. False authority fallacy.
False authority fallacy. Fallacy fallacy. You don't own anyone.
LOL! The statistics back up what I asserted.
Thanks for your latest surrender.
You didn't give any statistics.
False authority fallacy. Fallacy fallacy. You don't own anyone.