Juanita Broderick signed an affidavit saying it was untrue.

Jarod said:
Juanita Broaddrick signed an affidavit saying it was untrue that Bill Clinton raped her.

They did not care they went on and on about it, absolutely certain he had done so.

Mrs. Broderick was a mentally stable adult.

Now one of the multitude of Underage girls who were victims of a sex trafficking scheme said once that Trump was not inappropriate with her, so he’s clearly innocent of anything and everything.

These people care nothing about child rape, only about defending Trump Trump Trump.

A video of him sodomizing a Child could come out, and they would defend it.
Click to expand...
Which she then retracted in 1999. Your desperation is comical.
 
Jarod said:
To a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Click to expand...
That’s pretty dumb.

Un martillito clavó un clavito, sí, un martillito clavó un clavito, donde está el clavito que clavó ese martillito?

One little hammer hammered a little nail, yes, one little hammer hammered a little nail, where is the little nail that little hammer hammered?
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
Brilliant
Click to expand...
yes

I know.

c70ad1a721802fe71c402da6df7c08e9.jpg
 
Jarod said:
I’ve answered several times…

He is not dumb, he saw the emails, he has seen TACO flip on the issue once releasing the docs became a possibility.
Click to expand...
You supposedly went to law school. You saw the emails too.
Speculation is not proof.
Based on your posts I speculate you’re no lawyer. Do I have proof one way or another? No.
So I have no idea. Neither does Freddy. No one does .
Jarod said:
My evidence is the emails, the photos of them together, the personality of TACO, and TACO's desperation to keep whatever is there hidden.
Click to expand...
Wow. Even a layman would agree that would get you nowhere in court.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
it's just funny how your hearsay-like evidence convinces you about trump but not about the Clintons.

hilarious.
Click to expand...
I am not surprised you cant see the difference. "Hearsay-Like" is very entertaining. Objection Judge, that is hearsay-like! (Not really hearsay, but you know, kinda like it.

The comment about Clinton, is clearly a joke made by someone who has know reason to know or have seen the facts, the comment about TACO is two people who have reason to know the truth, talking about a plan for what to do. The indication of credibility is much stronger in the TACO comment, and it is consistent with other things we know about the facts. We know TACO was long time friends with Pedo-Stein, and that they lived in the same neighborhood, and that TACO and Pedo-Stein knew the young girl in question. We know that Pedo-stein paid young girls for sex at that time period and hosted them at his house. We know that TACO is fighting tooth and nail to keep the evidence secret, after campaigning on releasing that same evidence.

If you truly cant see the difference, you are lost.
 
Jarod said:
I am not surprised you cant see the difference. "Hearsay-Like" is very entertaining. Objection Judge, that is hearsay-like! (Not really hearsay, but you know, kinda like it.

The comment about Clinton, is clearly a joke made by someone who has know reason to know or have seen the facts, the comment about TACO is two people who have reason to know the truth, talking about a plan for what to do. The indication of credibility is much stronger in the TACO comment, and it is consistent with other things we know about the facts. We know TACO was long time friends with Pedo-Stein, and that they lived in the same neighborhood, and that TACO and Pedo-Stein knew the young girl in question. We know that Pedo-stein paid young girls for sex at that time period and hosted them at his house. We know that TACO is fighting tooth and nail to keep the evidence secret, after campaigning on releasing that same evidence.

If you truly cant see the difference, you are lost.
Click to expand...
it was from the same tranche of emails that they're using to in-dicked trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top