Judge Luttig

Phantasmal

Phantasmal

Administrator
Staff member
[h=1]Retired conservative judge: ‘Trump disqualified himself’ from ballot

“Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday arguing that former President Trump is disqualified to run for public office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, argued the Supreme Court justices, when they hear arguments next month in the case involving the Colorado Supreme Court decision to bar Trump from the ballot, should take a “textualist” approach to interpreting the constitution.”

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...luttig-trump-disqualified-himself-ballot/amp/
[/h]
 
Phantasmal said:
[h=1]Retired conservative judge: ‘Trump disqualified himself’ from ballot

“Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday arguing that former President Trump is disqualified to run for public office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, argued the Supreme Court justices, when they hear arguments next month in the case involving the Colorado Supreme Court decision to bar Trump from the ballot, should take a “textualist” approach to interpreting the constitution.”

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...luttig-trump-disqualified-himself-ballot/amp/
[/h]
Click to expand...

Let's hope SCOTUS agrees...although a better solution for keeping Trump off the ballot is for God to take Donnie home.

8ecuw5.jpg
 
Phantasmal said:
[h=1]Retired conservative judge: ‘Trump disqualified himself’ from ballot

“Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday arguing that former President Trump is disqualified to run for public office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, argued the Supreme Court justices, when they hear arguments next month in the case involving the Colorado Supreme Court decision to bar Trump from the ballot, should take a “textualist” approach to interpreting the constitution.”

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...luttig-trump-disqualified-himself-ballot/amp/
[/h]
Click to expand...

"Having “incited, and therefore engaged in, an armed insurrection” against the Constitution, Luttig wrote, Trump “disqualified himself under Section 3.”"

Show the evidence.
 
Yakuda said:
"Having “incited, and therefore engaged in, an armed insurrection” against the Constitution, Luttig wrote, Trump “disqualified himself under Section 3.”"

Show the evidence.
Click to expand...

He hired fake electors to go to Congress and try to cast fraudulent electors votes on his behalf.

He encouraged armed supporters to go to congress and stop the true electoral votes from being cast.
 
Phantasmal said:
[h=1]Retired conservative judge: ‘Trump disqualified himself’ from ballot

“Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday arguing that former President Trump is disqualified to run for public office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, argued the Supreme Court justices, when they hear arguments next month in the case involving the Colorado Supreme Court decision to bar Trump from the ballot, should take a “textualist” approach to interpreting the constitution.”

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...luttig-trump-disqualified-himself-ballot/amp/
[/h]
Click to expand...

I totally agree with a "textualist" interpretation of the Constitution. It says what it says right?

But you know that the RIGHT WING justices only use texualist interpretations of the Constitutions when they need to move the goalposts to make a political score.

Let's take section 3 of the 14th amendment as an example.

Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies there of same, But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

What the RIGHT WING justices will do is try and make the case that someone would have to be proven in a court of law, that he/she engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution, WHEN IT CLEARLY IS NOT ANYWHERE IN THE TEXT of the Amendment that that requires a conviction in any court of law!

And they will try and make the case that Donald Trump is somehow not an enemy of the Constitution!

The problem is not the Justices interpretation of the TEXT, it is the interpretation of the true motivations behind the RIGHT WING SCOTUS judgements!

Now more than ever, now that we have proof that some of them are accepting bribes and favors for their court decisions, and some that have been doing that for well over a decade now.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
He hired fake electors to go to Congress and try to cast fraudulent electors votes on his behalf.

He encouraged armed supporters to go to congress and stop the true electoral votes from being cast.
Click to expand...

To "try"? Lol

No he didn't. You're a grade A liar.
 
Yakuda said:
"Having “incited, and therefore engaged in, an armed insurrection” against the Constitution, Luttig wrote, Trump “disqualified himself under Section 3.”"

Show the evidence.
Click to expand...

It's been shown. The "Go peacefully" defense we've heard a thousand times is like the arsonist calling, "Don't burn yourself", to a couple inside a hay barn he just set on fire.
 
Yakuda said:
"Having “incited, and therefore engaged in, an armed insurrection” against the Constitution, Luttig wrote, Trump “disqualified himself under Section 3.”"

Show the evidence.
Click to expand...

You deny it outright like a cult butt boy every time we do

The top civil war experts in the nation sent one too


They want trump disqualified
 
https://amp.theguardian.com/law/202...upport-colorados-removal-of-trump-from-ballot



Twenty-five historians of the civil war and Reconstruction filed a US supreme court brief in support of the attempt by Colorado to remove Donald Trump from the ballot under the 14th amendment, which bars insurrectionists from running for office.
Will Trump provoke a crisis of legitimacy for the US supreme court? | Sidney Blumenthal
“For historians,” the group wrote, “contemporary evidence from the decision-makers who sponsored, backed, and voted for the 14th amendment [ratified in 1868] is most probative. Analysis of this evidence demonstrates that decision-makers crafted section three to cover the president and to create an enduring check on insurrection, requiring no additional action from Congress.”
 
One is the worlds premiere expert on the civil war


All are the very pinnacle of the field


Of course you Russian turd brains will just ignore their expertise
 
Jarod said:
He hired fake electors to go to Congress and try to cast fraudulent electors votes on his behalf.

He encouraged armed supporters to go to congress and stop the true electoral votes from being cast.
Click to expand...

And one of those criminals is who filed against the Ga prosecutor
 
martin said:
It's been shown. The "Go peacefully" defense we've heard a thousand times is like the arsonist calling, "Don't burn yourself", to a couple inside a hay barn he just set on fire.
Click to expand...


Oh look!! Another "what he really meant" lyingass Leftist mind reader.



Twit.
 
The problem here is...

If Trump is disqualified from the ballot by the Supreme Court, upwards of half, possibly more, of the US population will see it as nothing short of election interference and the Left / Democrats using the courts to take their opposition off the ballot. Doesn't matter what you, or I, think about that, that WILL be the case. You can claim otherwise, but that'll make ZERO difference to those that see it as election interference.

The question then becomes:

If the 2024 election is seen as rigged, fraudulent, full of vote rigging / interference, will that cause a loss of faith in government? If so, what could that lead to?

I see this as an idiocy of the Left. They want Trump stopped at any cost. But if they do stop Trump through a legal maneuver, that cost could end up creating a civil war. I think it's far better to let the people decide who gets elected than kicking the opposition's front runner off the ballot in a somewhat questionable legal maneuver like some Third World dictator would do.
 
Phantasmal said:
[h=1]Retired conservative judge: ‘Trump disqualified himself’ from ballot

“Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday arguing that former President Trump is disqualified to run for public office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, argued the Supreme Court justices, when they hear arguments next month in the case involving the Colorado Supreme Court decision to bar Trump from the ballot, should take a “textualist” approach to interpreting the constitution.”

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...luttig-trump-disqualified-himself-ballot/amp/
[/h]
Click to expand...
WOW A RINO
 
Phantasmal said:
[h=1]Retired conservative judge: ‘Trump disqualified himself’ from ballot

“Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday arguing that former President Trump is disqualified to run for public office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, argued the Supreme Court justices, when they hear arguments next month in the case involving the Colorado Supreme Court decision to bar Trump from the ballot, should take a “textualist” approach to interpreting the constitution.”

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...luttig-trump-disqualified-himself-ballot/amp/
[/h]
Click to expand...

Even though Luttig is a staunch conservative magas will refer to him as a RINO because he won't knuckle under to the cult mentality.
 
Yakuda said:
"Having “incited, and therefore engaged in, an armed insurrection” against the Constitution, Luttig wrote, Trump “disqualified himself under Section 3.”"

Show the evidence.
Click to expand...

The evidence has been presented, and Luttig, a conservative, respected jurist has spoken. Who should we listen to- Luttig or you, a hate-filled internet troll?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The problem here is...

If Trump is disqualified from the ballot by the Supreme Court, upwards of half, possibly more, of the US population will see it as nothing short of election interference and the Left / Democrats using the courts to take their opposition off the ballot. Doesn't matter what you, or I, think about that, that WILL be the case. You can claim otherwise, but that'll make ZERO difference to those that see it as election interference.

The question then becomes:

If the 2024 election is seen as rigged, fraudulent, full of vote rigging / interference, will that cause a loss of faith in government? If so, what could that lead to?

I see this as an idiocy of the Left. They want Trump stopped at any cost. But if they do stop Trump through a legal maneuver, that cost could end up creating a civil war. I think it's far better to let the people decide who gets elected than kicking the opposition's front runner off the ballot in a somewhat questionable legal maneuver like some Third World dictator would do.
Click to expand...

Your assholes said the same kinda crap to keep Nixon out of prison

Then republicans just kept cheating in elections



No more get out of jail free cards for these criminals
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top