Judge okays Rittenhouse extradition.

T. A. Gardner said:
While that might be true, she wasn't knowingly facilitating a crime, therefore she's not complicit. At most, the parents might be libel for civil damages as Kyle is a minor. But they won't be libel for criminal offenses unless you can prove they knowingly aided and abetted Kyle in the acts he committed. It's going to be impossible to prove they knew before hand he would be involved in shootings. If he's tried as an adult, they are off the hook for civil claims too...
Click to expand...

You do not know that. You are speculating. I can wait for the charges and courts.
 
Trumpet said:
Sounds to me like you suggesting that this kid should have impunity to kill anyone he deems a politics opponent, but you forget that, that cuts both ways.
Click to expand...

you're jumping to a wacky conclusion. All I mentioned was signalmans obvious hypocrisy about who deserves protection and who doesn't when they are behind bars............however, if you want to discuss the obvious self defense shootings that happened, maybe you should watch all the videos first...........or would that quake your foundation of partisan obliviousness?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you're jumping to a wacky conclusion. All I mentioned was signalmans obvious hypocrisy about who deserves protection and who doesn't when they are behind bars............however, if you want to discuss the obvious self defense shootings that happened, maybe you should watch all the videos first...........or would that quake your foundation of partisan obliviousness?
Click to expand...

Way if a gunman killed a white supremacist, it would be a different story, so go peddle your delusions somewhere else.
 
Trumpet said:
Way if a gunman killed a white supremacist, it would be a different story, so go peddle your delusions somewhere else.
Click to expand...

don't pull the race card, or the leftist card. It doesn't work on Libertarians. If Rittenhouse was black and killed half a dozen white people that tried to attack him, i'd still be defending him
 
Nordberg said:
You do not know that. You are speculating. I can wait for the charges and courts.
Click to expand...

No, those are facts. You cannot criminally charge someone who wasn't involved or clearly didn't have intent to be part of the crime. You also cannot sue another adult for damages that some other adult did unless you can clearly show that the person being sued is in some way connected to the damages. Rittenhouse's parents are off the hook if he's considered an adult. If he is tried as a juvenile, then they could be sued as the responsible party for his actions civilly.
 
Tacomaman said:
Yes, one of your fellow trump-worshipping nutjobs shithead. Are you clear now?
Click to expand...

seeing how I'm a Libertarian that voted for Johnson in 2016 and Jorgensen last week........NO!!!!!!!!!! I'm not fucking clear on the mud you're trying to sling, you partisan, two dimensional brain dead fucktard
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you mean like how you IDIOTS KNOW rittenhouse went there to actively hunt people?????
Click to expand...

Exactly how fucking stupid are you? Btw, that was a rhetorical question shithead.

He wasnt going to McDonalds with a weapon now was he. Geez, you Libertarion wackos expose your stupidity more and more.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
seeing how I'm a Libertarian that voted for Johnson in 2016 and Jorgensen last week........NO!!!!!!!!!! I'm not fucking clear on the mud you're trying to sling, you partisan, two dimensional brain dead fucktard
Click to expand...

My bad. You are simply a numbnut Libertarian fuxstick. I stand corrected.
 
Tacomaman said:
Exactly how fucking stupid are you? Btw, that was a rhetorical question shithead.

He wasnt going to McDonalds with a weapon now was he. Geez, you trumptards expose your stupidity more and mire.
Click to expand...

I carry a weapon everywhere I go............you trying to tell my I do it because I'm hunting people, fuckwad?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so now we know you're a liberal because freedom scares the shit out of you......

View attachment 17764
Click to expand...

That's not liberal, that's Social Marxist.
Social Marxist is: "Do as they say is correct, or else".

Liberal is like : "Let's take in all the facts here and see what's going on, then make a decision". That's liberal.

Just sayin'. :dunno:

Footnote: Many Social Marxists and Communists claim to be liberal.

They are not.
 
Last edited:
Tacomaman said:
Exactly how fucking stupid are you? Btw, that was a rhetorical question shithead.

He wasnt going to McDonalds with a weapon now was he. Geez, you Libertarion wackos expose your stupidity more and more.
Click to expand...

So, mind read the intent of these guys for us since you are apparently so good at it...

article-0-1D98EAA900000578-936_634x475.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top