You ought to rethink how you phrased this. Many, many people have sex without being married. If you want to get all nit-picky and religious, it would be fornication, not adultery.
IRRELEVANT TO HARRIS SCREWING HER WAY INTO POLITICS....
You ought to rethink how you phrased this. Many, many people have sex without being married. If you want to get all nit-picky and religious, it would be fornication, not adultery.
Good grief is right. We're talking about a legal definition, not a biblical one. The adulterer was Brown, not Harris.
[h=2]Adultery[/h]Voluntary sexual relations between an individual who is married and someone who is not the individual's spouse.

You ought to rethink how you phrased this. Many, many people have sex without being married. If you want to get all nit-picky and religious, it would be fornication, not adultery.

Good grief is right. We're talking about a legal definition, not a biblical one. The adulterer was Brown, not Harris.
[h=2]Adultery[/h]Voluntary sexual relations between an individual who is married and someone who is not the individual's spouse.
NO, THE SLUT IS TOO...
Well there ya go then! "n individual who is married and someone who is not the individual's spouse".
daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayum!!!!![]()
You finally got it! The married one, Brown, is the adulterer.
just how many loopholes are you looking for, for this "fornicator"?![]()
I don't understand the question the way you phrased it but if you're criticizing Harris for having sex with a married (though separated) man, she's still not the adulterer in the pair. It's like saying Stormy Daniels was an adulterer, not trump.
The ONE WHO SCREWED HER WAY INTO POLITICS , IS HARISS, THE UNPRINCIPLED SLUT.
Show me the proof that she didn'tHe was still technically married....and the relationship furthered her career. (not one, but two political appointments during the time they "dated")
Are either of those untrue?

NO, THE CRITICISM IS IN THAT SHE DID IT FOR POLITICAL GAIN....
I don't understand the question the way you phrased it but if you're criticizing Harris for having sex with a married (though separated) man, she's still not the adulterer in the pair. It's like saying Stormy Daniels was an adulterer, not trump.
<jaw drops with awe>
I'm late to the party. Let me guess. JPP's Best Christian, Stench, is now virtue-signaling her distress over a cheating politician?

Oh lord. She's trying and failing to make Harris the equivalent of the orange warthog (shoutout to Toxic.)![]()
I don't understand the question the way you phrased it but if you're criticizing Harris for having sex with a married (though separated) man, she's still not the adulterer in the pair. It's like saying Stormy Daniels was an adulterer, not trump.
Agreed. Or like saying General Joseph Ralston was the adulterer, not Slick Willy....the other impeached draft-dodging serial adulterer.![]()

Agreed. Or like saying General Joseph Ralston was the adulterer, not Slick Willy....the other impeached draft-dodging serial adulterer.![]()
Do you have to say stuff like that now and then just to keep your conservative cred?
Why do some females hold other females to higher standards of sexual behavior than they do males?
Do you have to say stuff like that now and then just to keep your conservative cred?
Why do some females hold other females to higher standards of sexual behavior than they do males?