Ketanji Brown defines what stupid and DEI look like in comments made regarding the imaginary fabricated claim of birthright citizenship.

Guno צְבִי said:
Poor Low grade
Click to expand...
Yes, you are GUano. It must suck going through life and angry, brainless, unhinged, whiney, lying, Kamala voting leftist dumbfuck.


GuAno
Noun
gua·no | \ ˈgwä-(ˌ)nō

: a fertilizer containing the accumulated excrement of seabirds or bats broadly : excrement especially of seabirds or bats

: Bird shit
 
archives said:
Ah, now we got the full “you are ………” and “a …………,” just as predicted, only the corny GIF is missing

Never said there was, but it is covered under the Constitution just as a jury of one’s peers and privacy are, you are just repeating your invalidated “argument”
Click to expand...
Translation:
dragontan.gif
 
archives said:
If they had no official citizenship requirement or process prior to Lincoln wouldn’t anyone living in the US at the time be either a birthright citizen or descendant of a birthright citizen? In fact, you most likely are a descendant a birthright citizen.

At one time European immigrants from Ireland, Eastern, and Southern Europe, from which the majority of caucasian Americans today trace their roots, were also from improvised poor nations

And birthright citizen was never a serious issue thru all the waves of immigration America experienced
Click to expand...
The 14th amendment didn't exist at the time and if they had a disease, were considered to be unable to care for themselves and their families they were sent back.

So what part of the 14th amendment says that ILLEGAL babies dropped in this country have birthright citizenship? HINT: you won't find it anywhere in the constitution no matter how much you flail or stomp those tiny little insignificant feet. :palm:
 
ULTRA MAGA said:
Until? I think your mind is headed in the right direction now.

Think about why it became an issue and you will understand the fuss.
Here is a hint from Ai.

"U.S. immigration law began with the Naturalization Act of 1790, which established the first rules for U.S. citizenship. While the 18th and early 19th centuries had relatively open borders, federal restriction and regulation increased significantly in the late 1800s, starting with the Page Act of 1875 and the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882"

It was when people started gaming the system.
Click to expand...
The stipulation under the Naturalization Act of 1790 was that an immigrant had to livd here for two years, that’s it, technically making everyone a resident right citizens, and their children birthright citizens. You didn’t read the Act beyond AI

And we all know the reasons behind the Asian restriction Acts of the early 20th Century
 
archives said:
The stipulation under the Naturalization Act of 1790 was that an immigrant had to livd here for two years, that’s it, technically making everyone a resident right citizens, and their children birthright citizens. You didn’t read the Act beyond AI
Click to expand...

It's not 1790 you brainless moron. :palm:

archives said:
And we all know the reasons behind the Asian restriction Acts of the early 20th Century
Click to expand...

I doubt you know much at all given the stupidity you post here. :palm:
 
Truth Detector said:
The 14th amendment didn't exist at the time and if they had a disease, were considered to be unable to care for themselves and their families they were sent back.

So what part of the 14th amendment says that ILLEGAL babies dropped in this country have birthright citizenship? HINT: you won't find it anywhere in the constitution no matter how much you flail or stomp those tiny little insignificant feet. :palm:
Click to expand...
You mean the MAGA of the day didn’t think the recently free Black slaves “had diseases and were considered to be unable to care for themselves?” Doubtful

And I don’t know why you keep regurgitating the same debunked “so what part of the” bullshit over over again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top