Kyle Rittenhouse

Dutch Uncle said:
Each shot will be analyzed. Most damning IMO is his firing into the crowd. All the prosecution has to do is prove Kyle murdered one of the three, not all three.

Additionally there's the intentional harm of firing into a crowd. "Reckless endangerment" IIRC. Kyle is going to be convicted on felony charges. The question remaining is which ones and the length of his sentence.

Next up will be the douchebags who set up a 17 year old kid with a weapon.
Click to expand...

You mean the crowd (three idiots) that were attacking him?? That's self defense, dude.
 
He should have been aborted. His parents were obviously not breeding material.
Kyle Rittenhouses are the result of non state-approved pregnancies.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Each shot will be analyzed. Most damning IMO is his firing into the crowd. All the prosecution has to do is prove Kyle murdered one of the three, not all three.

Additionally there's the intentional harm of firing into a crowd. "Reckless endangerment" IIRC. Kyle is going to be convicted on felony charges. The question remaining is which ones and the length of his sentence.
Click to expand...

when police shoot at an assailant and hit innocent bystanders.........guess who gets charged with the death, or injury, of that innocent bystander? the person who initiated the conflict...............

you are dreaming that rittenhouse is going to be convicted of anything related to murder or reckless endangerment...........you should study the law before making ridiculous statements like that
 
Nordberg said:
They were trying to stop him from shooting more people. That is not self-defense dudette.
Click to expand...

This may help:

Self-defense laws in the US typically justify a person’s use of lethal force in public in situations where lethal force was necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm to themselves or another person. Traditionally, these laws have been clear that taking human life is not necessary, and is therefore not justified, if the person could have avoided using lethal violence by retreating, or simply stepping away from a confrontation. A person does not have a duty to retreat from a conflict before using force in their home, however (known as the Castle Doctrine).1

Stand your ground laws upend centuries of legal tradition, allowing a person to use deadly force in self-defense in public, even if that force can be safely avoided by retreating or when nonlethal force would suffice.

Wisconsin Law
Wisconsin does not have a stand your ground law. The state’s case law allows juries to consider a failure to retreat when evaluating the necessity of a person’s use of force in public.2

Wisconsin does, however, allow for the use of deadly force without a duty to retreat in defense of an occupied vehicle or business.
https://giffords.org/lawcenter/state-laws/stand-your-ground-in-wisconsin/

He was obviously retreating from Rosenbaum. He stood by Rosenbaum after shooting him. Once the mob screamed , "Get him!" he had no choice but to run.
He showed remarkable restraint under the circumstances to not shoot a guy that backed away from him when he was on the ground. This is pretty much open and shut. The only reason he's going to trial is to appease the woke, antifa and BLM.
He might get convicted of something but not murder or even manslaughter IMO. In fact I'd bet on that
 
anonymoose said:
This may help:

Self-defense laws in the US typically justify a person’s use of lethal force in public in situations where lethal force was necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm to themselves or another person. Traditionally, these laws have been clear that taking human life is not necessary, and is therefore not justified, if the person could have avoided using lethal violence by retreating, or simply stepping away from a confrontation. A person does not have a duty to retreat from a conflict before using force in their home, however (known as the Castle Doctrine).1

Stand your ground laws upend centuries of legal tradition, allowing a person to use deadly force in self-defense in public, even if that force can be safely avoided by retreating or when nonlethal force would suffice.

Wisconsin Law
Wisconsin does not have a stand your ground law. The state’s case law allows juries to consider a failure to retreat when evaluating the necessity of a person’s use of force in public.2

Wisconsin does, however, allow for the use of deadly force without a duty to retreat in defense of an occupied vehicle or business.
https://giffords.org/lawcenter/state-laws/stand-your-ground-in-wisconsin/

He was obviously retreating from Rosenbaum. He stood by Rosenbaum after shooting him. Once the mob screamed , "Get him!" he had no choice but to run.
He showed remarkable restraint under the circumstances to not shoot a guy that backed away from him when he was on the ground. This is pretty much open and shut. The only reason he's going to trial is to appease the woke, antifa and BLM.
He might get convicted of something but not murder or even manslaughter IMO. In fact I'd bet on that
Click to expand...

Watch how fast the supposed lawyers like Micabwer and Jarod shy away from this thread.......
 
Into the Night said:
You mean the crowd (three idiots) that were attacking him?? That's self defense, dude.
Click to expand...

Why do you think he has a "reckless endangerment" charge against him, Sybil?

Only a nutjob would support a person shooting innocent people in order to defend themselves against a single assailant.

Each shot Kyle fired will be scrutinized for legality and, IMO, a few of those injured innocent people and recklessly endangered others. The stupid kid is going to prison for 5-15 years.

What do you think the fucking morons who set him up are going to get, Sybil? 3 years? 5?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
they were trying to kill someone who shot a fellow looter......that is self defense
Click to expand...

a punk ass bitch no smarter than smarter than you does not decide who is a looter and who is not. he is a punk ass bitch who overreacted to a few guys rushing his ass. there is no video of anyone of them looting, you are just a goddamn chickenshit liar who needs his ass kicked. the others were unarmed, he was a punk ass armed asshole with false bravado from his penis-extender. after he murdered the first guy, and took off running, people were calling out for somebody to stop him, he had shot somebody, and two guys that tried he shot in cold blood at close range. he had time after his first murder to lay down his gun and just get out of there, but he was too fucking stupid for that, much like you would be.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
peoples personal fears and phobias do not dictate the rights of others, racist traitor
Click to expand...

Your race traitor accusations are not warranted...and not the first time you've thrown out the Race Traitor card.

Evince is a left wing, radical Peace, Love, Dove liberal, but as loud as she is, she'd never hurt anyone as your friends want to do. She'd never consider the deaths of a dozen kids in daycare to be "collateral damage" should a Right Wing Patriot blow up the Federal Building over them.

This whole Earl Turner fantasy has warped your brain, dude. Two wrongs don't make a right.

If you are really "SmarterthanYou", then you know this is true. As long as you don't cross the line, you are fine....but the moment you do or entice someone to do, you become part of the problem. LOL
 
SmarterthanYou said:
peoples personal fears and phobias do not dictate the rights of others, racist traitor
Click to expand...

Yes he is a racist traitor



He killed people he came armed to kill


Now he says he feared for his life


He’s the one with a gun and then went to a place to kill people


He came to kill


He killed the people as they tried to protect themselves from a crazed gunman who walked up on them
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Your race traitor accusations are not warranted...and not the first time you've thrown out the Race Traitor card.
Click to expand...
cry about it some more

Dutch Uncle said:
Evince is a left wing, radical Peace, Love, Dove liberal, but as loud as she is, she'd never hurt anyone as your friends want to do. She'd never consider the deaths of a dozen kids in daycare to be "collateral damage" should a Right Wing Patriot blow up the Federal Building over them.
Click to expand...
that sociopathic racist wants to see right wingers killed by the government and she considers wives and children of people she believes are racists collateral damage
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
he had no right to carry an assault weapon even with our stupid fuck pussy gun laws, stupid fuck clown.
Click to expand...

Hoosier Mommy is awesome!

sE2ujnX.jpeg


Disagreed with your assessment of current laws and JPP personalities.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top