T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Of course you do, Terry. You also sympathize with those who attacked the Capitol on 1/6.
Wrong of both counts.
Of course you do, Terry. You also sympathize with those who attacked the Capitol on 1/6.
There's no context to this thread but if it's simply about demographics Americans understandably often talk about white and black when it comes to race but the reality is Hispanics outnumber blacks in America and Asians are the fastest growing immigrant group (there are 3X more Asians than blacks in California).
To me, many people are stuck in the past on racial issues and think America is still a largely white and black country. That is not the case. Our two biggest states are a majority Hispanic (or close to it). Anecdotal but the middle and high school we're assigned to are both a majority Asian and over 80% Asian and Hispanic. How many people can come close to matching that?
It's not coincidence liberal publications are talking about Hispanic white supremacists because Hispanics are growing in size and while a majority vote Democratic they are not monolithic. Someone who understands this better than I can chime in but weren't Italians and even others not originally considered white? Would it be surprising if some of those we call Hispanic today will be called white in the future?
These are issues with which ethnically homogeneous [for the most part] nations don't have to struggle.
Multi-cultural nations like the US and Brazil [the last two Western nations with slavery] will always be socially regressive because they lack solidarity.
Well, perhaps not always--we don't know what evolution will bring--
but in our lives, that's what we'll continue to see.
Political correctness demands that we regard our diversity to be a strength, but just about every shred of evidence proves otherwise.
That's very disappointing as far as I'm concerned, but it's clearly true nonetheless, and there's nothing to be done about it.
Wrong of both counts.
You bring up interesting points about the homogenous nature of some countries. You'll have people in the U.S. preach about diversity then say we should be more like homogeneous countries like Norway or Denmark (but never countries like Singapore - I mean if you like diversity why not choose that a country that isn't largely all white?)
I know it's not P.C. to say, and is a racial microaggression, but the U.S. is a melting pot and we are becoming more diverse and more races are inter-marrying. We may become less white in the way we have more recently defined white but the definition of white may expand.
But ultimately, for those who think America is dominated by white supremacy, will a more diverse America be less white supremist? We've already seen black people called the black face of white supremacy and now we are seeing it for Hispanics. Is the 'Asian face of white supremacy' far behind?
Well, Singapore is pretty homogenous, as is Japan. Singapore is almost entirely Malaysian, Japan almost entirely Japanese.
I wonder... What does the radical Left think of Hispanic supremists and separatists, or Black supremists and separatists?
Well, Singapore is pretty homogenous, as is Japan. Singapore is almost entirely Malaysian, Japan almost entirely Japanese.
I wonder... What does the radical Left think of Hispanic supremists and separatists, or Black supremists and separatists?
Radical, Terry? I'm guessing 20 years ago you'd have recognized the answer to your own question. Not so much these days, eh?
Would it really surprise anyone that the radical Right supports White Supremacism? Not normal, sane and intelligent people. LOL
The bigger problem is prioritizing the threat and neutralizing them.
I picked Singapore specifically because it’s a well to do country and homogeneous, so if that’s what one desires (and having it be non-white) I’m surprised how rarely people talk about it compared to places like Norway and Denmark.
Separatists groups are rather small in number to my understanding so they don’t really register on most peoples radars.
Radicals are automatically non-starters with me, Terry. Why do you support radical RWers?What do you think of this radical Leftist?
[video=youtube;Mt3of5KMvCI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt3of5KMvCI[/vide]
Start at about 1 minute 15 seconds
What do you think of this radical Leftist?
Start at about 1 minute 15 seconds
Well, Singapore is pretty homogenous, as is Japan. Singapore is almost entirely Malaysian, Japan almost entirely Japanese.
I wonder... What does the radical Left think of Hispanic supremists and separatists, or Black supremists and separatists?
What if the tourists were right wingers?Singapore flogs American tourists.
Can't say that I care much for them.
What if the tourists were right wingers?
Singapore flogs American tourists.
Can't say that I care much for them.
Radicals are automatically non-starters with me, Terry. Why do you support radical RWers?
Because you support Alt-Right ideology and spread both hate and lies against anything left of your Alt-Right AKA Radical position.Why do you think I do?
Because you support Alt-Right ideology and spread both hate and lies against anything left of your Alt-Right AKA Radical position.
Answering a question with a question is a sign of dishonesty, Terry.
No, I don't. You only fantasize that due to your lack of ability to articulate a rational response.