Leading academic shafted by gender studies professor for innocuous joke

Mott the Hoople said:
I tend to agree though I lack your hostility towards the anti-gender crowd. If they want to be intellectual light weights and ignore biological facts that's their perogative I guess.
Click to expand...

Gender feminism to my mind is the living testimony to the old adage give somebody an inch and they'll take a mile. Bear in mind that they, if and when they gain serious power, will act with the same zealotry as any in history.
 
aloysious said:
Right. Professor Lebow apparently was too politically incorrect for the feminazi's sensitivity.
Click to expand...
Well who the fuck isn't?

Look...beta males tend get their skivies in a wad over academic feminist with their hypersensitivity and lack of a sense of humor. From the alpha male perspective it's a "who cares?" situation.

I say that cause there's a couple of realities of life, of the type gender neutral feminist and their witless allies the Castrati, don't take into consideration.

That is, If you give a man the keys to knowledge/power he will use it to conquer.

Conversely if you give a woman the keys to knowledge/power they will use it to emasculate.

So these women of letters and political power are really just doing what is in their nature to do. Cut our nuts off.

Having said that if we Alpha males, and some beta males, manage to hold onto our testicles we got that whole conquering thing going on in our favor.

Now who do you think is going to win that fight? The Emasculators or the Conquerors? That's right. The Conquerors!!

So why let feminist PC language bother you? (well unless they did get your nuts in which case I'll light a candle for you bro.).
 
Last edited:
Havana Moon said:
Gender feminism to my mind is the living testimony to the old adage give somebody an inch and they'll take a mile. Bear in mind that they, if and when they gain serious power, will act with the same zealotry as any in history.
Click to expand...

My guess is that won't happen and there's good reason for that. Regardless of what any feminist and their castrati allies think men still have their testicles and still very much act like men. Though a far more serious threat to gaining political power than say a libertarian the odds of feminist ideology obtaining true power are pretty slim. They just aint that good at that aggression thing.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
My guess is that won't happen and there's good reason for that. Regardless of what any feminist and their castrati allies think men still have their testicles and still very much act like men. Though a far more serious threat to gaining political power than say a libertarian the odds of feminist ideology obtaining true power are pretty slim. They just aint that good at that aggression thing.
Click to expand...

I think what is far more likely is that the likes of China and India will not kowtow to political correctness in the same manner as the West.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Well who the fuck isn't?

Look...beta males tend get their skivies in a wad over academic feminist with their hypersensitivity and lack of a sense of humor. From the alpha male perspective it's a "who cares?" situation.

I say that cause there's a couple of realities of life, of the type gender neutral feminist and their witless allies the Castrati, don't take into consideration.

That is, If you give a man the keys to knowledge/power he will use it to conquer.

Conversely if you give a woman the keys to knowledge/power they will use it to emasculate.

So these women of letters and political power are really just doing what is in their nature to do. Cut our nuts off.

Having said that if we Alpha males, and some beta males, manage to hold onto our testicles we got that whole conquering thing going on in our favor.

Now who do you think is going to win that fight? The Emasculators or the Conquerors? That's right. The Conquerors!!

So why let feminist PC language bother you? (well unless they did get your nuts in which case I'll light a candle for you bro.).
Click to expand...

Did you ask the missus if she thinks you're an alpha male?
 
Havana Moon said:
I think what is far more likely is that the likes of China and India will not kowtow to political correctness in the same manner as the West.
Click to expand...
But the west hasn't Tom!

Maybe you haven't been looking around but other than a handful of women who've competed to break through the glass ceiling have you notices who's actually running the world? Even when their completely free to compete they don't. You get to worked up over nothing. I mean granted I can see where you'd look at some younger generational sheltered pussy and be alarmed that this could be your grandson's fate but look at your own sons? Are they nutted little sissy boys?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
My guess is that won't happen and there's good reason for that. Regardless of what any feminist and their castrati allies think men still have their testicles and still very much act like men. Though a far more serious threat to gaining political power than say a libertarian the odds of feminist ideology obtaining true power are pretty slim. They just aint that good at that aggression thing.
Click to expand...

Castrati and clitterati, those are great words.
 
aloysious said:
Amazing some of the shit academics get grants for, isn't it?
Click to expand...


The National Science Foundation is just one of the latest to fall to the pernicious doctrine of identity politics and diversity.

One of the study’s directors is a University of Michigan sociologist specializing in gender and sexuality. Erin Cech has received multiple NSF grants; her latest publication is “Rugged Meritocrats: The Role of Overt Bias and the Meritocratic Ideology in Trump Supporters’ Opposition to Social Justice Efforts.” The other lead researcher, Tom Waidzunas, is a sociologist at Temple University; he studies the “dynamics of gender and sexuality” within STEM, as well as how “scientists come to know, and hence constitute, sexuality and sexual desire.” Such politically constituted social-justice research was not likely envisioned by Congress in 1950 when it created the NSF to “promote the progress of science.”

https://www.city-journal.org/html/how-identity-politics-harming-sciences-15826.html
 
Havana Moon said:
The National Science Foundation is just one of the latest to fall to the pernicious doctrine of identity politics and diversity.

One of the study’s directors is a University of Michigan sociologist specializing in gender and sexuality. Erin Cech has received multiple NSF grants; her latest publication is “Rugged Meritocrats: The Role of Overt Bias and the Meritocratic Ideology in Trump Supporters’ Opposition to Social Justice Efforts.” The other lead researcher, Tom Waidzunas, is a sociologist at Temple University; he studies the “dynamics of gender and sexuality” within STEM, as well as how “scientists come to know, and hence constitute, sexuality and sexual desire.” Such politically constituted social-justice research was not likely envisioned by Congress in 1950 when it created the NSF to “promote the progress of science.”

https://www.city-journal.org/html/how-identity-politics-harming-sciences-15826.html
Click to expand...

Life just can't go on without this study

https://news.stanford.edu/pr/96/961212behavgene.html

:palm:
 
Micawber said:
And yet there are certain people here who make indignation over any curtailment whatsoever of their god given right to act like Andrew Dice Clay at a stag show
a preoccupation. Probably the same sort who get caught beating off in public libraries. Republicans to a man.
Click to expand...

That’s just sick Mic! Who could do such a thing at a Public Library? Certainly no self respecting Republican. They all know you go to a rest stop at night for a Republican circle jerk. That or get elected to Congress and join the Freedom Caucus.
 
Havana Moon said:
The National Science Foundation is just one of the latest to fall to the pernicious doctrine of identity politics and diversity.

One of the study’s directors is a University of Michigan sociologist specializing in gender and sexuality. Erin Cech has received multiple NSF grants; her latest publication is “Rugged Meritocrats: The Role of Overt Bias and the Meritocratic Ideology in Trump Supporters’ Opposition to Social Justice Efforts.” The other lead researcher, uTom Waidzunas, is a sociologist at Temple University; he studies the “dynamics of gender and sexuality” within STEM, as well as how “scientists come to know, and hence constitute, sexuality and sexual desire.” Such politically constituted social-justice research was not likely envisioned by Congress in 1950 when it created the NSF to “promote the progress of science.”

https://www.city-journal.org/html/how-identity-politics-harming-sciences-15826.html
Click to expand...
Who the hell allows these grants? Obviously some SJW but how does a SJW get in that position? Maybe Mott would know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top