Left wing Class War gaining traction...

maineman said:
a lie by omission? bull shit. I knew what I was doing. I did it. I have NEVER lied about it. Have you never broken a law? Did the mere act of breaking that law make you a liar? Of course it didn't. It meant you broke the law. I broke the law. I never lied about breaking the law and I was ready and willing to let the chips fall where they may at the border. I felt my family's safety was that important to take that risk. You, clearly, being a total puss, would never have made ANY of the decisions I did... but then, you're an armchair stay at home pussy and I am not.
Click to expand...

A lie is a lie and you lied, which makes you a liar.
Then you took the cowardly way out and tried to make it look like you hadn't committed a lie; which was another lie, unto itself.
All of your lies have created a situation where it brings all of your behavior into question; ie: your supposed Military service and how much money you promised your "wife" to be with you, until you die.
 
you say that but you never seem to be able to prove it. I never lied. Are you gonna produce this supposed lie I supposedly told, or are you gonna keep on lying your ass off like you've been doing?

My guess is, the latter.

::::yawn::::
 
maineman said:
you say that but you never seem to be able to prove it. I never lied. Are you gonna produce this supposed lie I supposedly told, or are you gonna keep on lying your ass off like you've been doing?

My guess is, the latter.

::::yawn::::
Click to expand...

A lie is a lie and you lied, which makes you a liar.
Then you took the cowardly way out and tried to make it look like you hadn't committed a lie; which was another lie, unto itself.
All of your lies have created a situation where it brings all of your behavior into question; ie: your supposed Military service and how much money you promised your "wife" to be with you, until you die.
 
again... I never told one single lie. Not one. If you could prove otherwise, you would have.

And I could give a rat's ass what part of MY life YOU question... I'm living large and lovin' it... you got nothin' on me... damn, I pity you, you poor hapless jerk.
 
maineman said:
again... I never told one single lie. Not one. If you could prove otherwise, you would have.

And I could give a rat's ass what part of MY life YOU question... I'm living large and lovin' it... you got nothin' on me... damn, I pity you, you poor hapless jerk.
Click to expand...

You've already have shown that you new it was illegal to smuggle the gun into Mexico and that you failed to alert anyone that you were smuggling the gun into Mexico.
This in itself is an admission that you're a liar; because you tried to deny that you had done anything illegal.
Plus; if it wasn't illegal, then why would you have to have it made "legal"?

Pity me all you want; but at least I don't take pride in criminal behavior, like you do.

Does your marriage "agreement" come with a drop dead date?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You've already have shown that you new it was illegal to smuggle the gun into Mexico and that you failed to alert anyone that you were smuggling the gun into Mexico.
This in itself is an admission that you're a liar; because you tried to deny that you had done anything illegal.
Plus; if it wasn't illegal, then why would you have to have it made "legal"
Click to expand...

You use pretzel logic. I never denied anything to anyone. I answered every question posed to me by Mexican customs authorities completely and honestly. And I have retold the events of my crossing completely and honestly here as well. No lies. The only liar here is you.
 
maineman said:
You use pretzel logic. I never denied anything to anyone. I answered every question posed to me by Mexican customs authorities completely and honestly. And I have retold the events of my crossing completely and honestly here as well. No lies. The only liar here is you.
Click to expand...

You lied when you failed to inform the customs authority, that you were transporting a weapon into Mexico.
You knew it was illegal and you still did it.
You are dishonest and a liar.

And because of your dishonesty; you probably never served the Military, in any manner.
 
As I said... I presented my car and all its contents for inspection by the authorities. I answered all their questions completely and honestly. The agent did, in fact, inspect my car and its contents and allowed it to pass. Not one lie....

But we keep going round and round this mulberry bush... You got nothin'. You've never had anthing but nothin'. You bore me... Your jealousy is your problem... Not mine.

I think we're all through here. AMF
 
maineman said:
As I said... I presented my car and all its contents for inspection by the authorities. I answered all their questions completely and honestly. The agent did, in fact, inspect my car and its contents and allowed it to pass. Not one lie....

But we keep going round and round this mulberry bush... You got nothin'. You've never had anthing but nothin'. You bore me... Your jealousy is your problem... Not mine.

I think we're all through here. AMF
Click to expand...

But you didn't "present" your car and "all it's contents"; because you had the gun hidden, you knew you were required to inform the inspector and ergo: you lied.

Why would I be jealous of a gun smuggling lying criminal?
 
jet57 said:
No: laughing my ass off; he made a silly assertion that he obviously can't back up. So until he can objectively prove it, it remains a fallacy made up by a shill. And apparently you can't back it up either, so that makes you just as funny as he is.
Click to expand...

Wrong shit-for-brains; it was a factual statement backed up by several other posts. I can't help it if you are too stupid to comprehend.

Would posting the facts again make you any smarter?
 
maineman said:
USFREEDOM911.... it sounds like such a patriotic name... you must have a chest full of fruit salad after your years as a patriot serving this nation, eh?
Click to expand...

Another pathetic leftist dunce who thinks one must serve in order to be a patriot.

Moron.
 
it's not a requirement... but it certainly helps, doesn't it?

And then there are chicken hawks like you who advocate lots of military action but were too frightened to serve yourself.
 
Truth Detector said:
Wrong shit-for-brains; it was a factual statement backed up by several other posts. I can't help it if you are too stupid to comprehend.

Would posting the facts again make you any smarter?
Click to expand...

Posting the objective facts would make you look smarter - sure.
 
jet57 said:
Posting the objective facts would make you look smarter - sure.
Click to expand...

For dunces like you who prefer to wallow in blissful ignorance:

The top quintile of taxpayers pay 93% of the total income tax......

He got it wrong in that he interpreted the top quintile as paying 93% when it is more like 86.3%. I suppose your want to carp, whine, and complain that he was off by 6.7%?

But what we do know is that the top 5% pay over 50% of the taxes paid into the Federal Government. The claims that they are not paying enough are painfully stupid and based on a profound ignorance similar to Marxist Class envy rhetoric about what is fair and income inequality.

http://mercatus.org/publication/breakdown-federal-personal-income-taxes
 
you act as if "enough" were some mathematically quantifiable amount. It is not. Determining what is "enough" is a political process, not a mathematical one. You can castigate the process all you like and you can denigrate anyone who doesn't share your opinion about what "enough" is, or should be.... but that doesn't change the fact that determining what "enough" is is a process that our country has been visiting and revisiting for as long as there has been progressive income tax. As long as the most recent - and current- determination of what "enough" is was arrived at through the democratic process, that means that it is, by definition, "enough" for this moment. The process is fluid and ongoing.... sometimes the amount of taxes required to be "enough" goes up, sometimes it goes down... but all within the confines of a democratic process.
 
maineman said:
you act as if "enough" were some mathematically quantifiable amount. It is not. Determining what is "enough" is a political process, not a mathematical one. You can castigate the process all you like and you can denigrate anyone who doesn't share your opinion about what "enough" is, or should be.... but that doesn't change the fact that determining what "enough" is is a process that our country has been visiting and revisiting for as long as there has been progressive income tax. As long as the most recent - and current- determination of what "enough" is was arrived at through the democratic process, that means that it is, by definition, "enough" for this moment. The process is fluid and ongoing.... sometimes the amount of taxes required to be "enough" goes up, sometimes it goes down... but all within the confines of a democratic process.
Click to expand...

Interpretation: I don't know what the fuck I am talking about so I will post a bunch of moronic gobbledygook on the thread in hopes that no one notices what a brain dead hyper partisan moron I am.

Yay you! You have to be the only one on the planet who thinks the current tax code is just fine and dandy and that merely tweaking it to make the people who pay the lion’s share of it pay more will reduce poverty, balance budgets and create more jobs.
 
again... the current tax code is always being tweaked. To imagine that the US will, all of a sudden awaken and embrace the idea of a flat tax or any other super simple version of our income tax, given the entrenched special interests that push against such simplification is, well, moronic. That fairly well describes you.
 
maineman said:
again... the current tax code is always being tweaked.
Click to expand...

So what shit-for-brains; do you have anything else other than the OBVIOUS to share?

But of course everyone BUT you recognize that constantly tweaking the tax code has done NOTHING to create jobs, deal with inequality, raise the standard of living for the poor or balance budgets.

So for an unintelligent dullard like you the answer is to keep doing what you have always done expecting different results and outcomes.

maineman said:
To imagine that
Click to expand...

To imagine that there is an ounce of intelligence in that tiny retarded brain of yours would require the willing suspension of disbelief.

maineman said:
…the US will, all of a sudden awaken and embrace the idea of a flat tax or any other super simple version of our income tax, given the entrenched special interests that push against such simplification is, well, moronic.
Click to expand...

Why is it moronic other than a brain dead hyper partisan moron like you say it is?

Who is claiming that the US will suddenly awaken and embrace anything, you pathetic dunce? Once more we see the careful dishonest construction of a strawman so that you can argue with yourself like a retard.

maineman said:
That fairly well describes you.
Click to expand...

How ironic when a moron thinks others are morons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top