Lefties attack Trump's scotus pick
- Thread starter Evmetro
- Start date
jacksonsprat22
Verified User
Trump is a criminal. We oppose everything he does.
Can you quote evidence that his pick is a racist?
jacksonsprat22
Verified User
I don't care who he appoints. I'm against it.
I already know that. I am interested in what attack or corruption lefties will use to attack the pick. Obviously alleging racism is the default setting for lefties, but do you have any other predictions?
jacksonsprat22
Verified User
couldn't care less
That's why I want mitch to ram this through. Lefties have no regard for civics, and they wouldn't hesitate to ram a pick through if the shoe was on the other foot.
Lefties will pick her apart regardless of the truth.
They will use their usual lie filled bullshit; they are a threat to women's right to choose, too far to the right, not leftist enough, has a funny hairdo or any other lame canard they can find.
Then, after making complete jackasses of themselves, will lose the fight to prevent Trumps pick and an election. Then the crying and lying starts all over. They're too brain dead to have any self awareness and circumspect as to why.
If he picked Cruz, I wouldn’t claim Cruz is a racist, but he is a religious bigot.
Again, you whiny douchebag, what crime? You really are the definition of stupid.
^This is why you cannot have a discussion with a mentally unsound, lying hack douchebag on the left. Any questions?
A good choice:
And at age 48, Coney Barrett would serve on the court for decades to come if nominated and confirmed. Here's what you need to know about her:
Coney Barrett's education:
BA Rhodes College '94, JD University of Notre Dame Law School '97
Who she clerked for
Judge Laurence Silberman of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the US Supreme Court
Her positions
Previously an associate at law firm Miller, Cassidy, Larocca, and Lewin in Washington, DC
Professor at Notre Dame Law School, where she teaches constitutional law, federal courts, and statutory interpretation beginning in 2002
Wow! You replied on topic! Nice post!
He could pick BO and they would whine. Who cares ?
According to Trump and right wing logic, Trump has no right to make the pick, They made it all very clear during Garland. We should respect the Republican's well thought out positions. No Supreme seat should be considered during a the last year of an administration. You rights all brayed that for all to hear. They said it, so we assume they meant it. Otherwise we have to believe the arguments during Garland were all lies. But no matter how you slice it, the Repubs are being liars and hypocrites.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
That will only be the beginning. Expect accusations of sexist, xenophobic, Islamophobic, questionable and illegal sex acts, questionable and illegal business dealings, lying, fraud, and anything else they can think up.
Let's say Trump picks a woman. You can bet there'll be accusations she's slept with every guy she ever met since 4th grade. The senate hearings will turn into such a vile circus on the Democrat's part it will make the Kavanaugh hearings look acceptable. You can bet on that.