Racist fuck.
Leftist Will Be Shocked Again in November
- Thread starter Red Crow
- Start date
Racist fuck.
The last day is what counts since the polls are continually changing until then. After Comey said they were reopening the email investigation after the emails were found on Weiner's laptop, you can see Clinton's number decline (although they were already falling before that occurred).
In all those headlines you posted the problem was not in the poll but the assumption that the person with a plurality of popular votes will win the election. When one candidate wins the popular vote and the other the electoral vote it is almost impossible to predict since it means some swing states are extremely close.
The poll results for the national popular vote was very accurate, but predicting the electoral college winner is more difficult and not the function of a poll.
Good polls only use likely voters.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
If everyone is claiming that the democrat party is going to win, why would I be shocked if they do?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
LOL
Polls are already going strongly back in favor of Dems.
Righties here who thought this was a lasting "backlash" really need to stop outside their own POV. I knew once he was confirmed that it would fizzle.
Polls are already going strongly back in favor of Dems.
Righties here who thought this was a lasting "backlash" really need to stop outside their own POV. I knew once he was confirmed that it would fizzle.
Once again you ramble off the topic. I was merely pointing out that your claim was a pile of rubbish, as usual. The liberal left and their polls were all BUT naming Shrillary the next Prez....one had to wonder, why even have the election?
Is that a prediction snowflake?
Good polls are neither liberal or conservative. Those predicting Hillary would be the next president are not the fault of the polls which showed Hillary had a lead in the popular vote. I was just pointing out the polls were very close to the election outcome--which was true. What journalists chose to do with those polls had more to do with the publication making money by attracting readers. So, my claim was not a pile of rubbish as anyone can compare the polls results with the election.
You didn't believe Hillary would have a 3 million popular vote lead--but you were wrong.
More bloviated BS; you seem to be quite full of it.
How do you know what I believed? Hell, that's a moronic statement in itself as having the popular vote is meaningless in a Presidential election. Unless you're and angry, dumb, uneducated liberal partisan hack, then it has all the meaning in the world.
More bloviated BS; you seem to be quite full of it.
How do you know what I believed? Hell, that's a moronic statement in itself as having the popular vote is meaningless in a Presidential election. Unless you're and angry, dumb, uneducated liberal partisan hack, then it has all the meaning in the world.
You always deflect from the main point when your facts are wrong and turn to insults. I did not say the popular vote determines anything but the polls were about the popular vote which makes it very relevant for polling. Popular votes are not meaningless since they determine which candidate gets the electoral votes of each state.
The point I was making was that the polls very accurately reflected the final popular vote total---that you cannot (honestly) contest.
See if you can't lose some of that anger and debate in a civil tone. Those who resort to insults usually have nothing substantial left to say and reflects a limited vocabulary.
Grow a pair and stop your fucking whining.