Leftists Really Should Come to Grips with their TDS

[Into the Night]

All Digital graphic artists use apps you moron

No, they don't. Art requires no app. Digital art is transcribing art into the digital world, and requires nothing more than an editor with ADML capability. The Gimp is pretty decent at that task.

 

[Into the Night]

No, you said my 'memes were someone elses'

They are.

and I just proved to you that was false by incorporating your name on one of them,

That's not your art. That's just a cut and paste app. It's all you're capable of.

then you moved the goal post by attempting to trivialize my work as 'using an app'

Fallacy fallacy. No goalpost was moved. Word games won't work.

(which is dumb since all digital graphic artists use apps)

An ADML editor is not the app he was describing. You are just using apps from websites. That's not art.

and also insinuating all I did was 'type words into the app' insinuating I did no work on the other areas of the image, which, of course,the following meme disproves.

You did no work on any the image.

You prove your mind-boggling degree of stupidity each time you post, you really can't get your fingers out of the dummy cookie jar.

View attachment 30193

Your use of apps is obvious. A cut and paster you are, and a cut and paster is all you are. You have no mind of your own. Attempted proof by void.

 

[proud PETA member]

Without trump they (Democrats) are nothing.

Bingo!

 

[MAGA]

An opinion, anonymous or otherwise, it just that...an opinion. Nothing about any opinion makes it The Truth.

You will get the true opinion of the person even if they feel it's unpopular and will garner scorn from the beautiful people if they don't have to face you.

 

[IBDaMann]

No, you're an asshole because you are a legend in your own mind.

I'm far more than merely a legend in my own mind. I am the Beta and the Psi.

You think I'm an ashsole because my presence precludes you from being the authority on the subject. You simply want to preach, not learn.

Sorry, I do not engage with assholes,

Let's see, you've made it clear that you consider me to be an ashsole, and your engagement with me is locked in overdrive.

I have to say that your assertion is false.

especially assholes who:

1. Think they are smart, when it is clear they are not.

Your problem is that you don't have the capacity to make that determination. You are highly undereducated and often you are as stupid as fuqk. When you say someone is "clearly" not smart, you've just announced that said person might be the smartest person in the world; you simply do not know. Your judgement is shit and cannot be taken at face value. You have not shown that you know anything other than how to flee when forced to think for yourself or when obligated to apply critical reasoning. You kick up dust as you flee from the first sign of a differing view.

... and what happens when I offer to teach you something? That's right, you panic and reach for memes.

2. Are smug in their certainty such that they wouldn't ever remotely consider they are wrong, refuse to consider another's argument.

Again, your shitty judgement rears its ugly head. I tell you that 2+2=4 and you consider me "smug" for being certain. Of course I'm going to be certain in what I know. Uneducated losers who are deathly afraid of learning are going to HATE me for simply knowing things that I willingly share because it makes them feel threatened.

3. Traffic in vacuous claims/generalizations which cannot be substantiated

Now you are realizing that you should have learned how to perform an internet search and how to read English text so that you could independently verify what people tell you. Your inability to perform independent research, whether it be due to extreme laziness or due to inability to use the internet or your local library, is nobody else's fault.

4. Patronize, incessantly, as if they were God's gift to whatever the argument is about.

I'm willing to assume for the sake of argument that I'm God's gift to any topic, if that will get the ball rolling.

5. Traffic in weasel words ('everyone says' 'and you know it, too', all of which is a type of posturing. Trump does this all the time)

This is what you do. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and presume that you do not talk to yourself.

6. Traffic in loaded, charged, verbiage.

You don't get to use that as an excuse for fleeing out of sheer cowardice.

7. Ask questions with assumed, false, vague, highly debatable premises

You do not get to control the questions. Answer the questions posed to you. If they are too easy, then give the honest, direct and straightforward answers. Don't be a coward. If you don't understand any part of any question then ask for clarification.

8. Are incessantly off topic.

... so stop pivoting and stop derailing.

9 Traffic in egregious cynicism, nihilism. "Egregious'.

This is irrelevant. All are free to express any cynicism they might have, and you will like it.

10 Traffic in [mock-the-fleer]/[mock-the-coward] logic and [wait patiently] to engage.

FIFY. Just stop fleeing, tipping your king and pivoting when faced with knowledge that comes to you from outside your thought collective.

11 Misapply the logic of fallacy.

As a leftist, you have become accustomed to invoking every fallacy that exists. I don't think you are capable of forming a valid argument without help. As such, I am willing to help you, but it will involve me pointing out the myriad of fallacies behind which you hide.

I'm here for you if you wish. Formal logic is my thing.

12. Unjustly and egregiously trivialize, a type of posturing

How do you suggest the trivial be treated?

13. Refuse to substantiate a claim or claims.

I support everything I post. This is why I never need to flee.

14. Gish gallop (google it, yeah, i don't like the term, either, but it is a thing). There are exceptions, though.

All of my posts are of the format of this post, in which I break down each point and address each one individually and more-or-less thoroughly. Of course, some require more of a response than others, but I confine my response to clear verbiage on that point alone.

15. Egregiously Traffic in cheap shots, sophomoric remarks, diminishing/disrespecting, someone's name, like 'Joetato' etc. "egregiously".

Sorry, you're going to have to endure all the shots that I take. In saying the truth and nothing but the truth, I must tell the whole truth.

16. Traffic in, and fail to grasp, thought-terminating cliches ('fake news' "TDS" )

I do not have to respect, or even recognize, your denial of anything. Your desperation to delude yourself into denial does not impose any requirement on me to do likewise.

17. Fall prey to the demagogue/cult leader

I do not have to accept, or even respect, your desperate mischaracterizations.

18 Traffic in Unapplicable pithy aphorisms

I'll determine applicability for my aphorisms and you determine the applicability of yours, thank you very much.

19. Calling someone a Fascist, or a Communist, or some established group as a pejorative, without knowledge of what these things really are.

As an authority on this subject who draws directly from Karl Marx, I will continue calling all things "Marxist" to the extent that they are Marxist, and I will leave it to readers if they wish to take it as a slur or merely as an accurate observation.

There's a difference between 'Fascist', and 'fascist'.

Nope. One is simply a typo.

There are major differences in a Communist/Marxist, and a social democrat.

Both communists and socialists are Marxist. A social democrat is a socialist who is trying to deceive others.

20 Posturing. Posturing is a pseudo debate trick,

Ignored. This is just your insistence on controlling what is expressed. I'll determine what I express and you determine what you express, thank you very much.

I will never ask you for permission to post anything.

A) Shaming, belittling, talking others down in order to puff oneself up

Whatever. I don't need to "puff myself up". Leftists, however, apparently need to puff themselves up for some strange reason.

I do, however, shame and belittle all those who deserve it. For example, as a leftist, you probably support the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die. If this is your position then I will certainly shame you for being a shitty person. What are your thoughts on "abortion", for example? Do you think that contract killings are just wonderful because it really is just a matter of choice? Do let me know.

B) Flaunting credentials. On anonymous internet forums, they are meaningless. Either be willing to produce your credentials, otherwise, you're blowing smoke. You're an attorney? Okay, show us your bar card. You have a PHD? Okay, prove it.

Wrong. Yes, credentials are meaningless on anonymous fora ... therefore all claims of credentials are to be ignored. No, we don't demand credentials upon someone's claim of credentials, we simply ignore the claim and press forward. For example, if you were to present an image of a credential, I'll simply presume that you dropped your name into an app that generates such an image, and I'll press ahead. Credentials are meaningless. Everything you post should stand on its own.

Also, demanding or providing links does not support an argument either; pointing to someone who is equally mistaken does not change FALSE to TRUE.

See, all I'm interested in is the argument, sans the crap,

Then post your thesis/theorem/argument and then provide the support. Then, don't run away when you get a response. Stick around. Either refute the response or accept it by modifying your argument to incorporate it.

and all I've seen from you is crap,

... all you've seen from me has terrified you into fleeing to the hills. You have not posted any argument onto JPP but you have kicked up a lot of dust.

Would you care to make an argument, or do you not have any thoughts that are your own?

you're really full of shit, and you have no idea how many hundreds of petty fools like you I've encountered on the internet,

You have never encountered anyone like me, but I have had to deal with many hundreds of cowards like you. You find the fact that I stand ready to refute what you know to be your flawed arguments to be rather daunting, hence you never post anything of substance.

going all the way back to the days of Usenet.

I think I remember you. You were a coward back then as well.

You are a phony. And an asshole.

An ashsole, sure, but I'm definitely a genuine ashsole who is waiting for you to post an argument. Is that going to happen sometime in this decade?

 

[Into the Night]

You will get the true opinion of the person even if they feel it's unpopular and will garner scorn from the beautiful people if they don't have to face you.

A fair point.

 

[AProudLefty]

There are insane trolls but this one takes the cake.

 

[AProudLefty]

That would require a brain and a modicum of self-awareness; two things' leftists have none of.

Irony!

 

[AProudLefty]

Socks everywhere!

 

[Into the Night]

Socks everywhere!

You could always ask Sybil to curtail some of them. Try posting to Doc, Nordbutt, Cypresss, or any of his other socks. I don't think you'll much luck though, he's always creating new ones.

 

[Trumpet]

This thread is bizarre.

What do you expect from a bizarre thread author???

 

[Publius]

I'm far more than merely a legend in my own mind. I am the Beta and the Psi.

You think I'm an ashsole because my presence precludes you from being the authority on the subject. You simply want to preach, not learn.


Let's see, you've made it clear that you consider me to be an ashsole, and your engagement with me is locked in overdrive.

I have to say that your assertion is false.


Your problem is that you don't have the capacity to make that determination. You are highly undereducated and often you are as stupid as fuqk. When you say someone is "clearly" not smart, you've just announced that said person might be the smartest person in the world; you simply do not know. Your judgement is shit and cannot be taken at face value. You have not shown that you know anything other than how to flee when forced to think for yourself or when obligated to apply critical reasoning. You kick up dust as you flee from the first sign of a differing view.

... and what happens when I offer to teach you something? That's right, you panic and reach for memes.


Again, your shitty judgement rears its ugly head. I tell you that 2+2=4 and you consider me "smug" for being certain. Of course I'm going to be certain in what I know. Uneducated losers who are deathly afraid of learning are going to HATE me for simply knowing things that I willingly share because it makes them feel threatened.


Now you are realizing that you should have learned how to perform an internet search and how to read English text so that you could independently verify what people tell you. Your inability to perform independent research, whether it be due to extreme laziness or due to inability to use the internet or your local library, is nobody else's fault.


I'm willing to assume for the sake of argument that I'm God's gift to any topic, if that will get the ball rolling.


This is what you do. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and presume that you do not talk to yourself.


You don't get to use that as an excuse for fleeing out of sheer cowardice.


You do not get to control the questions. Answer the questions posed to you. If they are too easy, then give the honest, direct and straightforward answers. Don't be a coward. If you don't understand any part of any question then ask for clarification.


... so stop pivoting and stop derailing.


This is irrelevant. All are free to express any cynicism they might have, and you will like it.


FIFY. Just stop fleeing, tipping your king and pivoting when faced with knowledge that comes to you from outside your thought collective.


As a leftist, you have become accustomed to invoking every fallacy that exists. I don't think you are capable of forming a valid argument without help. As such, I am willing to help you, but it will involve me pointing out the myriad of fallacies behind which you hide.

I'm here for you if you wish. Formal logic is my thing.


How do you suggest the trivial be treated?


I support everything I post. This is why I never need to flee.


All of my posts are of the format of this post, in which I break down each point and address each one individually and more-or-less thoroughly. Of course, some require more of a response than others, but I confine my response to clear verbiage on that point alone.


Sorry, you're going to have to endure all the shots that I take. In saying the truth and nothing but the truth, I must tell the whole truth.


I do not have to respect, or even recognize, your denial of anything. Your desperation to delude yourself into denial does not impose any requirement on me to do likewise.


I do not have to accept, or even respect, your desperate mischaracterizations.


I'll determine applicability for my aphorisms and you determine the applicability of yours, thank you very much.


As an authority on this subject who draws directly from Karl Marx, I will continue calling all things "Marxist" to the extent that they are Marxist, and I will leave it to readers if they wish to take it as a slur or merely as an accurate observation.


Nope. One is simply a typo.


Both communists and socialists are Marxist. A social democrat is a socialist who is trying to deceive others.


Ignored. This is just your insistence on controlling what is expressed. I'll determine what I express and you determine what you express, thank you very much.

I will never ask you for permission to post anything.


Whatever. I don't need to "puff myself up". Leftists, however, apparently need to puff themselves up for some strange reason.

I do, however, shame and belittle all those who deserve it. For example, as a leftist, you probably support the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die. If this is your position then I will certainly shame you for being a shitty person. What are your thoughts on "abortion", for example? Do you think that contract killings are just wonderful because it really is just a matter of choice? Do let me know.


Wrong. Yes, credentials are meaningless on anonymous fora ... therefore all claims of credentials are to be ignored. No, we don't demand credentials upon someone's claim of credentials, we simply ignore the claim and press forward. For example, if you were to present an image of a credential, I'll simply presume that you dropped your name into an app that generates such an image, and I'll press ahead. Credentials are meaningless. Everything you post should stand on its own.

Also, demanding or providing links does not support an argument either; pointing to someone who is equally mistaken does not change FALSE to TRUE.


Then post your thesis/theorem/argument and then provide the support. Then, don't run away when you get a response. Stick around. Either refute the response or accept it by modifying your argument to incorporate it.


... all you've seen from me has terrified you into fleeing to the hills. You have not posted any argument onto JPP but you have kicked up a lot of dust.

Would you care to make an argument, or do you not have any thoughts that are your own?


You have never encountered anyone like me, but I have had to deal with many hundreds of cowards like you. You find the fact that I stand ready to refute what you know to be your flawed arguments to be rather daunting, hence you never post anything of substance.


I think I remember you. You were a coward back then as well.


An ashsole, sure, but I'm definitely a genuine ashsole who is waiting for you to post an argument. Is that going to happen sometime in this decade?

What a fucking moron, I swear.

You forget, I do not engage with assholes.

Why would any rational person argue with an asshole?

I posted one thread, thus far, many more to come, comprehensive, detailed, arguments demonstrative via logic, examples, links, etc. Doesn't necessarily mean I'm correct, or the argument perfect, but that's the whole point, to debate.

But, remember, I do not engage with assholes.

But you are clearly not interested in debate. You are only interested in being a disingenuous, self-aggrandizing, smug. arrogant asshole.

And clearly, based on your fecal evacuations thus far, you are the biggest asshole on this forum.

And guess what, you'll draw the monumentally stupid conclusion that I'm afraid of you.

Proof of your stupidity is all over the place, your ASSUMPTIONS of who I am are proof you are stupid.

And, really, the level of your stupidity is rare, indeed. It's the kind of stupidity in knowledge. You've studied some, and now you think you are intelligent. No, my friend, you are an idiot. Your are not even a useful idiot.

No, I'm utterly bored by you. You are what some might call a pinhead.

Anyone who thinks posturing is valid debate technique, noting that posturing comes in many varieties, is incompetent in the debate arena.

And you are as incompetent as they come. Debating you is a complete waste of time.

So, I'll have fun with my memes, you know, the ones that you moronically believed were 'someone else's'? Hah!

This is all you are good for.



Please pester someone else who has you confused with someone who is intelligent.
You see, intelligence isn't the thing, wisdom is the thing. But you are so stupid, that fact eludes you, and that fact explains perfectly who you are. A twit.

 

[Matt Dillon]

There are insane trolls but this one takes the cake.

Socks everywhere!

 

[IBDaMann]

What a fucking moron, I swear.

Look at this. You're a total genius.

You forget, I do not engage with assholes.

For the second time, you have made it clear that you find me to be an ashsole, and your engagement with me is still locked in overdrive.

Why would any rational person argue with an asshole?

Maybe I'm just feeling charitable.

I posted one thread, thus far, many more to come, comprehensive, detailed, arguments demonstrative via logic, examples, links, etc.

I wouldn't go that far. You suck at logic and your arguments are never comprehensive.

Doesn't necessarily mean I'm correct,

Clearly.

or the argument perfect, but that's the whole point, to debate.

Nope. The point is to learn. If there are errors in your argument, learn from them and fix your argument, don't continue chanting the same errors that have already been refuted.

But, remember, I do not engage with assholes.

Apparently you redouble your efforts and take your engagement to the next level.

But you are clearly not interested in debate.

You still haven't learned that you don't get to speak for me and you don't get to declare my interests.

And clearly,

Oooops, there you go with the word "clearly," meaning that you are about to show the board just how amazingly mistaken you are ...

based on your fecal evacuations thus far, you are the biggest asshole on this forum.

Sorry, I have tried to win that competition, as have several others, but Doc Dutch has it locked, hands down. Check the leader board.

And guess what, you'll draw the monumentally stupid conclusion that I'm afraid of you.

It's not a conclusion. It's an observation.

No, my friend, you are an idiot.

... because I don't chase after you when you flee?

Your are not even a useful idiot.

Correct. I will never allow others to do my thinking for me.

No, I'm utterly bored by you.

It would appear that you are utterly obsessed with me. You can't bring yourself to disengage.

You are what some might call a pinhead.

That would represent an improvement over much of what I have been called. Sure, I'm a pinhead.

Anyone who thinks posturing is valid debate technique,

Referring to difficult questions and inconvenient truths as "posturing" does not absolve you of your requirement to address and refute them.

And you are as incompetent as they come.

Why am I kicking your arse?

Debating you is a complete waste of time.

Why do you then waste so much of your time?

So, I'll have fun with my memes,

... showing that you are panicking, confirming that you are terrified of me.

You see, intelligence isn't the thing, wisdom is the thing.

I'll stick with intelligence, thank you. What you consider to be wisdom is folly. Why are you pestering me with this, anyway?

 

[AProudLefty]

Look at this. You're a total genius.


For the second time, you have made it clear that you find me to be an ashsole, and your engagement with me is still locked in overdrive.


Maybe I'm just feeling charitable.


I wouldn't go that far. You suck at logic and your arguments are never comprehensive.


Clearly.


Nope. The point is to learn. If there are errors in your argument, learn from them and fix your argument, don't continue chanting the same errors that have already been refuted.


Apparently you redouble your efforts and take your engagement to the next level.


You still haven't learned that you don't get to speak for me and you don't get to declare my interests.


Oooops, there you go with the word "clearly," meaning that you are about to show the board just how amazingly mistaken you are ...


Sorry, I have tried to win that competition, as have several others, but Doc Dutch has it locked, hands down. Check the leader board.


It's not a conclusion. It's an observation.


... because I don't chase after you when you flee?


Correct. I will never allow others to do my thinking for me.


It would appear that you are utterly obsessed with me. You can't bring yourself to disengage.


That would represent an improvement over much of what I have been called. Sure, I'm a pinhead.


Referring to difficult questions and inconvenient truths as "posturing" does not absolve you of your requirement to address and refute them.


Why am I kicking your arse?


Why do you then waste so much of your time?


... showing that you are panicking, confirming that you are terrified of me.


I'll stick with intelligence, thank you. What you consider to be wisdom is folly. Why are you pestering me with this, anyway?

You certainly are a master at gaslighting.

 

[IBDaMann]

You certainly are a master at gaslighting.

Gaslighting is yet another word you never properly learned. You don't know what it means, so you use it often to compensate.