Legalize it Already

[FUCK THE POLICE]

I am asking you, what evidence can YOU present to ME that shows that a scientific poll, using appropriate methodology, of 2034 out of 306,341,718 IS NOT accurate with 95% certainty to within +-2%?

 

[ib1yysguy]

oh my god, so ignorant.

This guy is a fucking retard. He is also a Republican. Coincidence? He pretty much fits the stereotype of the Republicans that Herbert wrote about who are actually proud of their ignorance.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

So US, you can't understand how a poll of 2000 could accurately predict an electorate of a hundred or more million, so the poll is invalid? Is that your argument? Because you are ignorant of the process, it isn't happening? Do you realize how foolish you are making yourself look?

2,034​

:lmao:
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I am asking you, what evidence can YOU present to ME that shows that a scientific poll, using appropriate methodology, of 2034 out of 306,341,718 IS NOT accurate with 95% certainty to within +-2%?

Still laughing at you and not with you.

2,034​

:lmao:
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Still laughing at you and not with you.

2,034​

:lmao:
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

This is not evidence.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

This is not evidence.

At least you got that one correct!!

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

 

[signalmankenneth]

http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/60959/

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

At least you got that one correct!!

I get it correct that you've presented no evidence to support your claim that scientific polling of 2034 individuals is not accurate with 95% certainty to +-2% of the total poluation? OK. So why do you still believe it?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I get it correct that you've presented no evidence to support your claim that scientific polling of 2034 individuals is not accurate with 95% certainty to +-2% of the total poluation? OK. So why do you still believe it?

A poll that represents .000006 to .000007 of the entire population is accurate.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

A poll that represents .000006 to .000007 of the entire population is accurate.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

it's called statistics you fucking idiot. Did you even graduate highschool? You can have a sample size as small as 300 and usually be with in +/- 5%.

The fact that you are laughing as if we have just stated the most obtuse fact (when in reality it is rather BASIC mathematics and science) just shows how stupid you are.

Honestly what you are doing is completely comparable to you saying "YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THE EARTH REVOLVES AROUND THE SUN? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA"

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

A poll that represents .000006 to .000007 of the entire population is accurate.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

A poll of 2000 does not represent .000006 of the entire population, it represents almost the ENTIRETY of said population. So yes, it's accurate.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

it's called statistics you fucking idiot. Did you even graduate highschool? You can have a sample size as small as 300 and usually be with in +/- 5%.

The fact that you are laughing as if we have just stated the most obtuse fact (when in reality it is rather BASIC mathematics and science) just shows how stupid you are.

Honestly what you are doing is completely comparable to you saying "YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THE EARTH REVOLVES AROUND THE SUN? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA"

STOP
PLEASE STOP
You're killing me

:lmao:
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

 

[USFREEDOM911]

A poll of 2000 does not represent .000006 of the entire population, it represents almost the ENTIRETY of said population. So yes, it's accurate.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

 

[uscitizen]

Here, ignorant child:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/19561/Who-Supports-Marijuana-Legalization.aspx

Results are based on telephone interviews with 2,034 national adults, aged 18 and older, conducted Aug. 3-5, 2001, Nov. 10-12, 2003, and Oct. 21-23, 2005. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±2 percentage points.

You can tell a persons age over the phone?

btw I lie to all telephone pollsters.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

A poll that represents .000006 to .000007 of the entire population is accurate.

Yes.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

STOP
PLEASE STOP
You're killing me

:lmao:
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

This has to be satire.

ARE YOU REALLY TRYING TO TELL ME THAT HUMANS EVOLVED FROM MONKEYS?!!?1?!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!

 

[zappasguitar]

Are you trying to parody another poster on this site? Because I have no clue who posts like this...

Nope. He's serious.

That's USFree's standard debating technique.

 

[zappasguitar]

I am asking you, what evidence can YOU present to ME that shows that a scientific poll, using appropriate methodology, of 2034 out of 306,341,718 IS NOT accurate with 95% certainty to within +-2%?

You are wasting your time.

This has been USFree's standard tactic for YEARS.

He uses deflection and derision every time it becomes apparent he is wrong about some point.

 

[DamnYankee]

The issue of drug legalization has become a hot topic as of late. ...

Fugetaboutit. The feds can't effectively tax pot, so it and all drugs will never be legalized. Learn to drink good booze.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

You are wasting your time.

This has been USFree's standard tactic for YEARS.

He uses deflection and derision every time it becomes apparent he is wrong about some point.

I was trying to give him the benefit of a doubt, let him explain himself, and show him why scientific polling is reasonable and accurate. But he has proven himself completely unwilling to listen.