Let me propose a healthcare system

Yeah, because it's a fact that half of us will never need healthcare in our lifetime. Why should that half that doesn't need have doctors have to subsidize the other half, keep them from dying? Grossly unfair, might I say.

half will not need healthcare ? Well I guess about 1/2 of us do die young....

I have the same problem with auto insurance. Never needed it so why should I have to pay for it.
Never had a wreck in over 1 million miles and many years of driving.
never a ticket besides parking ones either.
 
half will not need healthcare ? Well I guess about 1/2 of us do die young....

I have the same problem with auto insurance. Never needed it so why should I have to pay for it.
Never had a wreck in over 1 million miles and many years of driving.
never a ticket besides parking ones either.

It was mockery. Everyone is going to need healthcare at sometime. If we have to give out "charity" by helping the especially sick in our society, then so be it. But national healthcare is cost effective, and it relieves people of the burden of having to look for mortage their house to pay for their kids cancer treatment. Doesn't that make us a better society?


US, we aren't going to take your word for it, K? People will crash, and they won't have enough money to pay for the lawsuit. That's why everyones required to have car insurance.
 
Right I might crash this evening. But I have not so far....

And rob has not crashed while driving drunk , so driving drunk is ok ?

:rolleyes:

I say just roll it all into one big health care plan. Medicare, medicaid, schip, etc
 
Its hospitals gleam. Waiting-lists are non-existent. Doctors still make home visits. Life expectancy is two years longer than average for the western world.

....For the patient, the French health system is still a joy. Same-day appointments can be made easily; if one doctor's advice displeases, you can consult another, a habit known as nomadisme médical. Individual hospital rooms are the norm. Specialists can be consulted without referral. And while the patient pays up front, almost all the money is reimbursed, either through the public insurance system or a top-up private policy.

For family doctors too, liberty prevails. They are self-employed, can set up a practice where they like, prescribe what they like, and are paid per consultation. As the health ministry's own diagnosis put it recently: “The French system offers more freedom than any other in the world.”


And despite the Economist's scary headline, which proclaims that "crisis looms," the French system provides this service to everyone in the country and does it for less than half the cost per person of the U.S. Even if they decide to raise taxes to cover a growing deficit in their healthcare fund (the subject of the Economist's article) their costs will still be less than half ours per person.

Now, there are undoubtedly drawbacks to the French system. They probably have fewer high-tech machines than we do, and the comparative cost figures may be skewed by the American love of elective procedures. Still, there would have to be a lot of drawbacks to make their system less attractive than ours.

So why not adopt it? Well, that would be socialized medicine. Can't have that, can we? After all, everyone knows that when you socialize something it automatically declines slowly into anarchy and uselessness. Right?
 
http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html

1 France
2 Italy
3 San Marino
4 Andorra
5 Malta
6 Singapore
7 Spain
8 Oman
9 Austria
10 Japan
11 Norway
12 Portugal
13 Monaco
14 Greece
15 Iceland
16 Luxembourg
17 Netherlands
18 United Kingdom
19 Ireland
20 Switzerland
21 Belgium
22 Colombia
23 Sweden
24 Cyprus
25 Germany
26 Saudi Arabia
27 United Arab Emirates
28 Israel
29 Morocco
30 Canada
31 Finland
32 Australia
33 Chile
34 Denmark
35 Dominica
36 Costa Rica
37 United States of America
 
Last edited:
Yeah butt our health care system is not broken, why fix it ?

Seems like I recall hearig that a lot somewhere....
 
Back
Top