Thank you Jesus!!!
Let them eat a gilded ballroom!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
A web site such as this is only providing a platform, there are a few things they could be liable for, but very few. The platform is not required to police speech.
Knowingly allowing your platform to be used to further a crime, maybe, but that’s really about it.
You never seem to admonish @Phantasmal.
Your little village in PA doesn't speak for the entire country, and you don't speak for your little village in PA.
Y O U only speak for yourself, just like the rest of us do.
christiefan915
Catalyst
I speak for Pittsburgh and I never said we were representative of the entire country. It's magas who think they speak for everyone.You never seem to admonish @Phantasmal.
Your little village in PA doesn't speak for the entire country, and you don't speak for your little village in PA.
Y O U only speak for yourself, just like the rest of us do.
Admonish her for what?
No you don't.
LINK
Anything, AFAIK.
Do you deny giving her a pass because you like her, or do you deny that she's ever projected her personal opinion as representative of a majority view?
When did they elect you to speak for them?
christiefan915
Catalyst
^Sorry about laughing at the bolded. I've done the same with you for years and you never complained.
christiefan915
Catalyst
When did they elect Y O U to speak for them? "Yep the people know to blame the Schumer shutdown on the Democrats"
Didn't you once post that exact statement? No, I can't link to it because when @Damocles updated to Xenforo the database didn't sync, but it's in the Christiequotes file.
Do you deny it?
Have you? When?
The same time you were elected to speak for Pittsburgh, maybe.
christiefan915
Catalyst
I didn't deny anything. Years ago I said openly that I give more leeway to my friends' posts if I disagree with them. Or else I try to disagree politely without attacking them. It's called common courtesy. I disagree with a lot of your posts now, maybe even most of them, but I don't call you out on every one.
Do you need a hug?
Kudos, you didn't lie.
Yes, you did. But when did you disagree with @Phantasmal?
I'm pretty sure it's called a double standard.
christiefan915
Catalyst
I don't recall disagreeing with Phan because we think alike about politics. Can you think of something I should have disagreed with her about?Kudos, you didn't lie.
Yes, you did. But when did you disagree with @Phantasmal?
I'm pretty sure it's called a double standard.
I'm sure you'll put the worst possible spin on anything you disagree with, i.e. common courtesy v. double standard. Yet you're all in when it comes to the double standards of magas.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
TruthLine Reports ·
Follow
2h ·BREAKING: E Jean Carroll publicly humiliates Donald Trump by revealing that his disgusting body odor and bizarre behavior "mesmerized" the jury during the trial that resulted in her $83 million defamation win.
These details are hilarious as they are gross...
“I don’t understand how people can be afraid of a fat, elderly man who wears apricot makeup, his hair done up like Tippi Hedren in The Birds, and sits in a courtroom and moans and groans and complains and snorts,” Caroll told The Daily Beast podcast.
“They were mesmerized. You have never seen anything like it,” she said of the jury. “He never sat still, and he talked the entire time within earshot of the jury. He belittled Alina Habba, his own attorney. He would spit as he was talking. He didn’t smell so good.”
She recounted how her attorney Roberta "Robbie" Kaplan really got under Trump's skin...
"He stood up with steam coming off his back and hot air blowing out his ears because Robbie Kaplan was giving the final argument, and she was asking the jury how much it would take to make him stop," said Carroll.
“She drove him so crazy, he stood up in the courtroom and left,” she explained. "When a man is innocent, he doesn’t storm out of a courtroom; he stays and fights. He turned tail and stormed out of the courtroom. He lost right at that second. He couldn’t have looked more guilty."
Caroll credibly accused Trump of raping her and he was ultimately found civilly liable for sexually assaulting her. She was awarded $5 million but then Trump continued defaming her in public and denying her story, eventually resulting in her massive $83.3 million victory.
“When the jury heard the evidence, it wasn’t very hard,” Kaplan told the Daily Beast.
“The clerk opens it up, reads it, frowns, shakes his head, folds it back up, and then hands it to Judge Kaplan,” said Caroll. “And Judge Kaplan opens it up, and his eyebrows rise up towards his hairline, and he frowns, and he says, ‘Madame forewoman, what does the M stand for?’”
The forewoman explained that "m" stood for "million.
“That was a moment,” said Carroll. “I left my body. As I say, I felt like Peter Pan who flies around the ceilings. And quite frankly, I’ve never come down from that. That win was so enormous and so powerful, not for me, not for Robbie, but for everybody in the country who had sort of lost hope that he could ever be beaten.”
“We’re still feeling the good victory of that. It’s happened. And we’ve proved—Robbie proved, and I proved—that Trump can be beaten,” Carroll continued. “He can be beaten.”
E. Jean Caroll is right. Trump shouldn't be feared. He can be defeated. All it takes is the courage to fight back.
Please like and share!
Jake Starkey
Verified User
Yet we have some clowns far to the respectable right acting like they talk for Christianity as well as America.You never seem to admonish @Phantasmal.
Your little village in PA doesn't speak for the entire country, and you don't speak for your little village in PA.
Y O U only speak for yourself, just like the rest of us do.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
Just note who is coming down on middle-stream Christianity while defending White Christian Nationalism.
Any pertinent reason why I should, or is this deflection?