Thank you Jesus!!!Democrats are not currently in power anywhere in the federal government.
Thank you Jesus!!!Democrats are not currently in power anywhere in the federal government.
A web site such as this is only providing a platform, there are a few things they could be liable for, but very few. The platform is not required to police speech.How do you avoid liability when a poster, multiple posters, have in their signatures “Trump is a child molester.” Trump is a pedophile”…I’m sure your lawyer has addressed this but isn’t there liability?
The president has never even been charged with rape, of anyone.
Your little village in TX doesn't speak for the entire country.

Ask us up north who we think is responsible.
I speak for Pittsburgh and I never said we were representative of the entire country. It's magas who think they speak for everyone.You never seem to admonish @Phantasmal.
Your little village in PA doesn't speak for the entire country, and you don't speak for your little village in PA.
Y O U only speak for yourself, just like the rest of us do.
I speak for Pittsburgh
It's magas who think they speak for everyone.
Admonish her for what?
When did they elect you to speak for them?I speak for Pittsburgh and I never said we were representative of the entire country. It's magas who think they speak for everyone.
Admonish her for what?
^Sorry about laughing at the bolded. I've done the same with you for years and you never complained.No you don't.
LINK
Anything, AFAIK.
Do you deny giving her a pass because you like her, or do you deny that she's ever projected her personal opinion as representative of a majority view?
When did they elect Y O U to speak for them? "Yep the people know to blame the Schumer shutdown on the Democrats"When did they elect you to speak for them?
Sorry about laughing at the bolded.
I've done the same with you for years.
When did they elect Y O U to speak for them?
I speak for Pittsburgh.
I didn't deny anything. Years ago I said openly that I give more leeway to my friends' posts if I disagree with them. Or else I try to disagree politely without attacking them. It's called common courtesy. I disagree with a lot of your posts now, maybe even most of them, but I don't call you out on every one.Didn't you once post that exact statement? No, I can't link to it because when @Damocles updated to Xenforo the database didn't sync, but it's in the Christiequotes file.
Do you deny it?
Have you? When?
I didn't deny anything.
Years ago I said openly that I give more leeway to my friends' posts if I disagree with them.

It's called common courtesy.
I don't recall disagreeing with Phan because we think alike about politics. Can you think of something I should have disagreed with her about?Kudos, you didn't lie.
Yes, you did. But when did you disagree with @Phantasmal?
I'm pretty sure it's called a double standard.
I don't recall disagreeing with Phan because we think alike about politics.
You're all in when it comes to the double standards of magas.