Lets go over the facts.....

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
[FONT=&quot]Let me get this straight . . . [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]We're going to be "gifted" with a health care[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]plan we are forced to purchase and[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]fined [/FONT][FONT=&quot] if we don't, [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Which purportedly covers at least[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]ten million more people [/FONT][FONT=&quot],[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]without adding a single new doctor ,[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents , [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]written by a committee whose chairman [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]says he doesn't understand it , [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]passed [/FONT][FONT=&quot] by a Congress that didn't read it but[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]exempted [/FONT][FONT=&quot] themselves from it, [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]and signed by a Dumbo President who smokes , [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]with funding administered by a treasury chief who[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]didn't pay his taxes [/FONT][FONT=&quot], [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]for which we'll be taxed for four years before any[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]benefits take effect [/FONT][FONT=&quot], [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]by a government which has [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare [/FONT][FONT=&quot], [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]all to be overseen by a surgeon general [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]who is obese , [/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]and financed by a country that's broke!!!!![/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]'What the hell could possibly go wrong [/FONT][FONT=&quot]?'[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
 
Yes. The government self conciously set out to bankrupt social security and medicare. That is why they are such expensive programs. People who attempt to offer more sensible explanations, such as the rising elderly population, are just elitist intellectuals who can't be trusted.
 
Yes. The government self conciously set out to bankrupt social security and medicare. That is why they are such expensive programs. People who attempt to offer more sensible explanations, such as the rising elderly population, are just elitist intellectuals who can't be trusted.


Long on groans, short on facts....at least you addressed 2 of the 15 issues mentioned (more than I can say for most pinheads) but

No, Sonny, they didn't "set out" to bankrupt SS and MC....but that is exactly whats happening.......maybe they thought that raising benefits and the number of those covered, while touting a payroll tax holiday, the money would somehow magically appear out of the Democrats money tree.....abysmally lame, but at least you tried
Alexander Hamilton, you ain't.....

Wanna see how you can do with the other 13 issues mentioned.
 
Do you ever wonder why you are not taken seriously?

Its because you would then be forced to admit the Demo/Socialist Party and their policies are a total failure....
So stay happy and keep that head of yours under the rock......like the saying goes, ignorance is bliss
 
Thats what we're doing moron.

Maybe you should have fact-checked it first.

Q: Will the IRS hire 16,500 new agents to enforce the health care law?

A: No. The law requires the IRS mostly to hand out tax credits, not collect penalties. The claim of 16,500 new agents stems from a partisan analysis based on guesswork and false assumptions, and compounded by outright misrepresentation.

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/03/irs-expansion/
 
Maybe you should have fact-checked it first.

Q: Will the IRS hire 16,500 new agents to enforce the health care law?

A: No. The law requires the IRS mostly to hand out tax credits, not collect penalties. The claim of 16,500 new agents stems from a partisan analysis based on guesswork and false assumptions, and compounded by outright misrepresentation.

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/03/irs-expansion/

that must be why they purchased sixty Remington Model 870 Police RAMAC #24587 12 gauge pump-action shotguns, to hand out tax credits?
 
that must be why they purchased sixty Remington Model 870 Police RAMAC #24587 12 gauge pump-action shotguns, to hand out tax credits?

Gee, I don't know. Maybe searching out modern-day versions of Al Capone?

The quote was issued February 2, 2010. The House voted March 21, the law was signed March 23. Are you suggesting somebody knew six weeks in advance that the bill would pass the House?

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportu...76bd4de14bbda5aba699e80621d&tab=core&_cview=1
 
Gee, I don't know. Maybe searching out modern-day versions of Al Capone?

The quote was issued February 2, 2010. The House voted March 21, the law was signed March 23. Are you suggesting somebody knew six weeks in advance that the bill would pass the House?

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportu...76bd4de14bbda5aba699e80621d&tab=core&_cview=1

i'm suggesting a whole hell of a lot of people knew it was going to pass the house. increasing the size of government by 16.5 k people? yeah, in a second.
 
i'm suggesting a whole hell of a lot of people knew it was going to pass the house. increasing the size of government by 16.5 k people? yeah, in a second.

That whole hell of a lot of people must have been psychic. It only passed the House by seven votes. Perhaps you can cite something that shows how many IRS agents were added to date. But as for 16,000, I call bullshit.
 
(Reuters) - The Internal Revenue Service would get an additional 5,100 agents under President Barack Obama's increased budget request, setting up a clash with Republicans who advocate cuts for the tax collection agency.
Obama's 2012 budget proposal, released on Monday, calls for a $1.13 billion, or 9.4 percent, funding increase for the IRS for fiscal 2012, to $13.28 billion for fiscal 2012. Adding the extra agents would only amount to about a 5 percent increase in manpower to 100,537.

I didn't say they were already hired but this is a good start....give the guy a breakl, it takes time to fuck up the system as badly as he is.....
 
(Reuters) - The Internal Revenue Service would get an additional 5,100 agents under President Barack Obama's increased budget request, setting up a clash with Republicans who advocate cuts for the tax collection agency.
Obama's 2012 budget proposal, released on Monday, calls for a $1.13 billion, or 9.4 percent, funding increase for the IRS for fiscal 2012, to $13.28 billion for fiscal 2012. Adding the extra agents would only amount to about a 5 percent increase in manpower to 100,537.

I didn't say they were already hired but this is a good start....give the guy a breakl, it takes time to fuck up the system as badly as he is.....

"...the IRS submitted a budget request to the U.S. Department of the Treasury for fiscal year 2012 that includes estimates for workers needed to begin implementing the health care bill. PolitiFact read the 159-page budget request and found requests for 1,269 employees to prepare for the health care tax changes, at a cost of $473.4 million. But most of the requests were made for IRS support roles such as information technology or customer service. Few were for agents."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ntsman-says-irs-will-hire-19500-new-workers-/
 
"...the IRS submitted a budget request to the U.S. Department of the Treasury for fiscal year 2012 that includes estimates for workers needed to begin implementing the health care bill. PolitiFact read the 159-page budget request and found requests for 1,269 employees to prepare for the health care tax changes, at a cost of $473.4 million. But most of the requests were made for IRS support roles such as information technology or customer service. Few were for agents."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ntsman-says-irs-will-hire-19500-new-workers-/


How lame....you're gonna make a distinction between agents and some other work label.....how desperate can you get.....:palm: OK, you got me.

How about between the ones wearing sneakers and the ones wearing loafers.....thats a difference.
 
Maybe you should have fact-checked it first.

Q: Will the IRS hire 16,500 new agents to enforce the health care law?

A: No. The law requires the IRS mostly to hand out tax credits, not collect penalties. The claim of 16,500 new agents stems from a partisan analysis based on guesswork and false assumptions, and compounded by outright misrepresentation.

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/03/irs-expansion/
Seems more like a soft tyranny, when you put it that way. I feel loads better. Thank you, christiecommunistfan! ;)
 
Back
Top