Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Lame troll is lame. At least his tag is dead-on accurate...
Net job loss.The stimulus? 350 billion in jobs, 350 billion in tax cuts?
Net job loss.
How many times do you think you'll repeat this? The reality is when you say, "You are not worthy of a response."The difference between a liberal and a conservative? The liberal thinks. The conservative repeats.
Again. Obama told us his plan would save or create a certain number of jobs. It created a net job loss. He told us it would make it so we never went above 8%, warned us that if it didn't pass we'd hit 10%...We said (or at least people with sense said) from the outset that the stimulus wasn't large enough to literally eliminate any job losses. Hell, an adequately sized 1.2 trillion dollar stimulus wouldn't have eliminated job losses.
How many times do you think you'll repeat this? The reality is when you say, "You are not worthy of a response."
It really means:
"I can't answer anything you say, even as the strongest apologist possible until I get marching orders from huffpost."
Weak.It's mainly because it's just a bunch of feel-good rhetoric that's not designed to be responded to.
Again. Obama told us his plan would save or create a certain number of jobs. It created a net job loss. He told us it would make it so we never went above 8%, warned us that if it didn't pass we'd hit 10%...
His plan didn't work, because it sucked. Tax incentives for creating jobs, that's the way to get people to hire in a recession. You can't make enough government jobs to get even close to what the private companies will create with the correct incentive.
Which solely shows his inadequacy in leadership. He doesn't appear to be getting much better either. The urge to make sure that Congress gets blamed for every plan is hurting him.I'm with you that Obama was overly optimistic there. I was with Krugman on this one. I do think it helped soften the recession, possibly preventing it from becoming something far worse. It's indicators were frighteningly similar to the great depression. The stimulus wasn't large enough, and it was feared that it wasn't large enough to prevent a huge catastrophe, but its seems to have done so.
Economics isn't a game of certainty, but I think the probability of there being a great depression like event was greater than the probability that the economy would peter out at 11% unemployment without stimulus. Or at least large enough that I'd support it regardless.
Direct tax incentives for creating jobs would've been a grand thing to attach onto it, but we couldn't even think of anything like this because of the Maine Twin's deficit peacocking. Direct job creation is good as well though.
I think Obama is still pushing for the job creation tax credit. This is one area you could fault him for not having enough balls - he really did support it from the outset. If his electoral platform had been enacted into law, his approval would be at 70% right now. But he let congress do everything.
Which solely shows his inadequacy in leadership. He doesn't appear to be getting much better either. The urge to make sure that Congress gets blamed for every plan is hurting him.
The reality is what I said would happen did. It seems that the "right" can think just a bit better than the person you elected to lead us. Your little bumper sticker soundbyte stinks as a truism.
They both offered that, which was my point.Yes,Herbert HooverJohn McCain would've offered us excellent leadership here. Leadership into disaster.
I did not run for President to turn away from these challenges.
I didn't run to kick these challenges down the road. I ran for President to confront them –- once and for all.
That would be an epic mistake...