'Liberals were right': Far-right Trump ally calls MAGA 'biggest scam in history'

One that MAGA nation was ALL TOO HAPPY to partake of for the last 10 or so years.
It was very relevant 10 years ago. Right now, it's being used as a red herring that a lot of conservative influencers are falling for.
Ummm, yeah, sure, finding out the president one voted for is possibly guilty of some of the most disgusting crimes known to humans is clearly not as important as an invention first used by Thomas Jefferson in the 18th century.
:rofl2:
 

White supremacist and antisemitic podcaster and Donald Trump supporter Nick Fuentes went on an epic rant attacking the president as "fat" and "a joke."

Speaking on his Thursday podcast, Fuentes questioned, "And now he says if you're not on board with the Epstein coverup — oh, I don't want your support. You're a weakling."


“F--- you. F--- you," Fuentes blasted. "You suck. You’re fat. You’re a joke. You’re stupid. You’re not funny. You're not as smart as you think you are. And, honestly, if you watch my show, you know I've been very critical; I've never been this far. This just goes to show this entire thing has been a scam. When we look back on the history of populism in America, we are going to look back on the MAGA movement as the biggest scam in history, and the liberals were right. The MAGA supporters were had. They were."

ALSO READ: 'They're gonna regret': GOP warned disaster looms as Senate drama boils

"When we look back in history, we will see Trump as a scam artist who served as a vehicle for this rather than the other way around. We were not the vehicle for Trump. Trump was the vehicle for all of us," he later said.


See the clip below or at the link here.
Another brain-dead post from a libtard moron. I’m a bit of a media connoisseur, yet I’ve never heard of this loser. You do realize both sides have their share of unhinged nutcases, right? Should be obvious, but you’re a libtard. The left’s got the overwhelming majority of batshit-crazy podcasters and outlets, do we assume they speak for you and every dimwit libtard here?
 
Another brain-dead post from a libtard moron. I’m a bit of a media connoisseur, yet I’ve never heard of this loser. You do realize both sides have their share of unhinged nutcases, right? Should be obvious, but you’re a libtard. The left’s got the overwhelming majority of batshit-crazy podcasters and outlets, do we assume they speak for you and every dimwit libtard here?
Do you feel better now, Tedious?
 
And it's not relevant now because....well we all know exactly why, don't we?
Who knows how much the evidence was tampered with over ten years.....
I wouldn't call it a red herring to find out if the current most powerful man on earth likes to <word censored> children or not.
It's a red herring. If there was actually anything legitimate against President Trump, then it would have been released YEARS ago (or at the very least before he got re-elected for the THIRD time). At this point, anything "against President Trump" with regard to Epstein would be utterly fabricated fake news (planted evidence) akin to the various other hoaxes (e.g. "Russia Russia Russia", "pee pee dossier", etc)
 
Children being raped and sex trafficked. Trump : BORING! NOTHING TO SEE HERE!
Now Trump only wants to release select files not all of them. JPP MAGAts blame all of this on the Democrats but MAGAs in Congress want all of the files too. What is Trump trying to hide?

President Trump said Thursday that he was directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to release relevant grand jury testimony on the Epstein case. Goldman, however, contended that grand jury testimony would only contain evidence relating to Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

Goldman, a former federal prosecutor, then ticked off several other types of documents that he said could actually contain evidence about potential Epstein clients: videos, photographs, recordings, witness interviews, texts and emails.

“That’s where the evidence about Trump and others will be,” he added.

The announcement from the Trump administration generated pushback from other lawmakers hungering for the files.

Rep.
Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), perhaps the most vocal GOP lawmaker pushing for the release of the files, wrote “Keep the pressure on, it’s working. But we want all the files.”
.
 
Who knows how much the evidence was tampered with over ten years.....

It's a red herring. If there was actually anything legitimate against President Trump, then it would have been released YEARS ago (or at the very least before he got re-elected for the THIRD time). At this point, anything "against President Trump" with regard to Epstein would be utterly fabricated fake news (planted evidence) akin to the various other hoaxes (e.g. "Russia Russia Russia", "pee pee dossier", etc)
QED on MAGAt denials.
 
Who knows how much the evidence was tampered with over ten years.....

It's a red herring. If there was actually anything legitimate against President Trump, then it would have been released YEARS ago (or at the very least before he got re-elected for the THIRD time). At this point, anything "against President Trump" with regard to Epstein would be utterly fabricated fake news (planted evidence) akin to the various other hoaxes (e.g. "Russia Russia Russia", "pee pee dossier", etc)
" Who knows how much the evidence was tampered with over ten years..." Yep and the same with Hunters laptop, but you MAGAS wanted to make sure that was all looked at so why not this?
 
" Who knows how much the evidence was tampered with over ten years..." Yep and the same with Hunters laptop, but you MAGAS wanted to make sure that was all looked at so why not this?
The hypocrisy is hip deep when it comes to MAGAts protecting their Daddy.

What kind middle-aged or older man needs a daddy?
 
Back
Top