Lies don't fly on 𝕏. I suspect that's why lefties loathe it!

[ZenMode]

Find some and request Community Notes on 'em.

Of course you'll need to prove they're lies, and convince a majority of a bipartisan group of users to agree.

This system represents a unique approach to crowd-sourced content moderation, focusing on transparency and community engagement in fact-checking.

Users must have no recent violations of X's community rules, have been an X user for at least six months, and have a verified phone number to be eligible to contribute notes. Once approved, contributors use an alias to maintain anonymity in their contributions.

Contributors can propose notes for posts they believe need additional context or correction. These notes include a rationale explaining why the context is needed, often with links to reliable sources for verification. Notes are not immediately visible to all users; they first undergo a rating process by other contributors. Contributors rate these notes based on their helpfulness, with notes needing ratings from users of different perspectives to be deemed "helpful" and thus publicly visible. This system aims to avoid echo chambers by ensuring notes are agreed upon by diverse viewpoints.

The visibility of notes is determined by an algorithm that looks for consensus across different political spectrums, not just by popularity. The algorithm aims to show notes that are helpful to a broad audience, considering both the number of ratings and the diversity of the raters. Notes that achieve a "Helpful" status appear directly on posts, providing immediate context to readers.

Notifications are sent out to all affected users when a post someone has engaged with later receives a note.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1721609170368258260

@Grok



Hop to it. Chop-chop!

You're making this way too complicated. Regardless of their policies and procedures, a lot of what is posted on Twitter is ridiculous conspiracy theories and flat out lies.

 

[Diogenes]

You're making this way too complicated. Regardless of their policies and procedures, a lot of what is posted on Twitter is ridiculous conspiracy theories and flat out lies.

Maybe.

If you see any, follow the process to correct the transgressors.

"The best way to ensure that @CommunityNotes are as accurate as possible is to become a contributor.

The system is completely decentralized and open source, both code and data.

Any manipulation would show up like a neon sore thumb!

No one at 𝕏, including me, has any editorial control.

The way the system works is that people who have historically disagreed must agree that a note is valid for it to be shown."



~Elon Musk

https://twitter.com/x/status/1873862372101968352

Otherwise, perhaps you should sit down.

 

[ZenMode]

Maybe.

If you see any, follow the process to correct the transgressors.

"The best way to ensure that @CommunityNotes are as accurate as possible is to become a contributor.

The system is completely decentralized and open source, both code and data.

Any manipulation would show up like a neon sore thumb!

No one at 𝕏, including me, has any editorial control.

The way the system works is that people who have historically disagreed must agree that a note is valid for it to be shown."



~Elon Musk

https://twitter.com/x/status/1873862372101968352

Otherwise, perhaps you should sit down.

I don't care that much to put in the work. I would prefer that people just realize that random Twitter users are not a valid source for news.

 

[Diogenes]

I don't care that much to put in the work.

That's your problem.

 

[tigerred59]

As a fan of X, I can tell you, most of the content that is removed or no longer active, is mostly conservative lies....just saying

 

[Diogenes]

I can tell you, most of the content that is removed or no longer active, is mostly conservative lies....just saying

So you say.

Let me know if you have any verifiable evidence to confirm that assertion - the kind that's not your opinion or anecdotal.

Naturally, I'll understand if you can't.

 

[ZenMode]

So you say.

Let me know if you have any verifiable evidence to confirm that assertion - the kind that's not your opinion or anecdotal.

Naturally, I'll understand if you can't.

The first sign is that random people make claims that often don't make sense and they provide no supporting source.

 

[Diogenes]

The first sign is that random people make claims that often don't make sense and they provide no supporting source.

How awful! That never happens on any other platform. Oh, wait...

𝕏 has Community Notes, though. Is that why you hate it, leftist?​

 

[ZenMode]

That's your problem.

No. Not at all. I want people to be able to "say", within the limits of the law, anything they want. The people on the path of believing baseless claims and conspiracy theories will most likely be hit by reality and it will be a valuable learning experience.

 

[ZenMode]

How awful! That never happens on any other platform. Oh, wait...

𝕏 has Community Notes, though. Is that why you hate it, leftist?​

I don't hate X and I'm certain it happens on Facebook, TikTok, etc.

 

[Diogenes]

I don't hate X.

So you say, leftist. I don't believe you.

 

[Diogenes]

I want people to be able to "say", within the limits of the law, anything they want.

So you say, leftist. I don't believe you.