Life's little contradiction

He says he's a Buddhist so apparently that means it's perfectly fine to deny indigent people food, housing, medical care because they're all lazy slackers and that's why they're poor. He believes the bullshit that there are entire generations of able-bodied American citizens who have never had a job and live solely off the backs of the taxpayers. Bet you can't guess what race he thinks they all are. *eyeroll*
Wrong! I'm saying just because you are poor you don't deserve endless handouts and help while doing nothing to improve your own lot. If you won't try and improve, why should others carry you endlessly?
And, if you believe there aren't exactly that sort of persons on welfare in many Western countries with such programs, you are an oblivious fool.
 
Much of Europe was far more socialist back in the 50's to the 70's. In most nations, major industry was government owned. The tax rates were onerous. That changed in the early 80's as socialism on that level brought nations to the edge of bankruptcy.

I can remember watching a 60 minutes episode where they were interviewing this famous Swedish author. She said that the government that year told her that her income taxes amounted to 110% of her income!

In Britian, the automotive, steel, coal, aerospace, and shipbuilding industries were going bankrupt from costs and building shitty quality products few wanted. France was the same.

One thing Allende in Chile did was partially privatize the national retirement system. That is, the government started investing a portion of the funds in private companies, stocks, bonds, etc. The economy made a massive recovery almost overnight.

Bottomline: Socialism simply doesn't work. Most nations can tolerate a degree of it if it is carefully managed and not let spin out of control.

Universal government run healthcare has a lot of economic negatives. In the UK, the NHS is the nation's largest employer now and the system threatens to bankrupt the country. I had to use the military healthcare system for years. It is ponderous, slow, inefficient, but it generally does provide reasonable care in the end.
Responding to each paragraph:

1. Not quite. If you READ ALL the content of the links I provided, you'll see differently.


2. The perception of Sweden as a nation defined by its high tax rates is accurate, with the country consistently ranking among the highest in the world for tax-to-GDP ratio. This high collection rate is a fundamental financial mechanism supporting a distinctive social and economic structure. The Swedish system represents a deliberate policy choice where citizens exchange a higher portion of their income for comprehensive, universal public services.

www.egalclarity.org/why-is-swedens-tax-rate-so-high/


3. Generalized statements with no documentation, that do NOT support your myopic contentions.
4. Key word here is 'PARTIALLY' ... something akin to the socialist democratic system advocated by Sanders and Mamdani here in America.
5. The examples I gave prove otherwise. You are aware that America has what I call "selective" socialism ... corporate welfare, banks that are "to big to fail", your highway system, the postal system, etc. Essentially, you're just being insipidly stubborn and (again) inserting your supposition and conjecture as logical facts.


6. Regarding England:

Soon after Starmer’s center-left Labour Party won a landslide victory in the July 4 election, the government ordered a review of the NHS led by surgeon and former health minister Ara Darzi. In a report published Thursday, Darzi said he was “shocked by what I have found.”

He blamed more than a decade of “almost constant reorganization” along with “austerity and capital starvation” under Conservative governments for a deterioration “not just in the health service but in the state of the nation’s health.”

The NHS “has faced rising demand for health care from a society in distress,” Darzi said.

www.apnews.com/article/uk-national-health-service-critical-report-9bf305a5792484587f47582f02e46a21

And let's not forget that the it was the GOP under Reagan/Bush/Bush have systematically cut funding to the VA and such over the years.

Why don't you stop going down this rabbit hole and just concede the point of the OP? What is it about the OP that has you desperately trying to deny political/social policies that work better than others? Like I previously stated, no system is perfect.
 
No jake snarkey, we on the political right seem to be the only people who care about America. You lefties are undermining America's constitution, our culture, our very livelihoods, our safety, our
moral standards, and our freedom rights as citizens to do our own thing without the oversight
and intrusion of big government. You know, big obtrusive govt which has become the mainstay
of the democrat party.
1. Forcing victims of rape or incest to bring a pregnancy to term.
2. Waiting until the last possible moment when a woman's pregnancy is a threat to her life to condone an abortion IN SPITE OF doctor's diagnosis. (which has caused cases of death and severe injury).
3. Weaponizing the FCC to threaten any TV network who has entertainers that mock or make fun of the current administration.
4. Usurping Constitutional, federal and state law to near privatization of the Immigration & Naturalization services to abduct "suspected" illegal aliens, hold them in (initially) an undisclosed location, then ship them to a foreign country that was NOT their home country ..... ALL DONE WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, which has resulted in naturalized or native born citizens going through this.
5. Pardoning of convicted criminals, some who have resumed criminal activity, who were legally tried and convicted.
6. Killing of people in international waters on the alleged crime of drug trafficking .... offering NO evidence.

I could go on, but you're head would explode while scrambling to find the maga talking point to counter reality.
 
Responding to each paragraph:

1. Not quite. If you READ ALL the content of the links I provided, you'll see differently.


2. The perception of Sweden as a nation defined by its high tax rates is accurate, with the country consistently ranking among the highest in the world for tax-to-GDP ratio. This high collection rate is a fundamental financial mechanism supporting a distinctive social and economic structure. The Swedish system represents a deliberate policy choice where citizens exchange a higher portion of their income for comprehensive, universal public services.

www.egalclarity.org/why-is-swedens-tax-rate-so-high/


3. Generalized statements with no documentation, that do NOT support your myopic contentions.
4. Key word here is 'PARTIALLY' ... something akin to the socialist democratic system advocated by Sanders and Mamdani here in America.
5. The examples I gave prove otherwise. You are aware that America has what I call "selective" socialism ... corporate welfare, banks that are "to big to fail", your highway system, the postal system, etc. Essentially, you're just being insipidly stubborn and (again) inserting your supposition and conjecture as logical facts.


6. Regarding England:

Soon after Starmer’s center-left Labour Party won a landslide victory in the July 4 election, the government ordered a review of the NHS led by surgeon and former health minister Ara Darzi. In a report published Thursday, Darzi said he was “shocked by what I have found.”

He blamed more than a decade of “almost constant reorganization” along with “austerity and capital starvation” under Conservative governments for a deterioration “not just in the health service but in the state of the nation’s health.”

The NHS “has faced rising demand for health care from a society in distress,” Darzi said.

www.apnews.com/article/uk-national-health-service-critical-report-9bf305a5792484587f47582f02e46a21

And let's not forget that the it was the GOP under Reagan/Bush/Bush have systematically cut funding to the VA and such over the years.

Why don't you stop going down this rabbit hole and just concede the point of the OP? What is it about the OP that has you desperately trying to deny political/social policies that work better than others? Like I previously stated, no system is perfect.
You are like my insane sisterinlaw who would edit her lawyer's documents in crayon, and when corrected, yelled, "Do your damned job." Then he fired her.
 
Back
Top