So, you're a lot like TOP?Your favorite person, @TOP, made more than that. I don't hear you saying anything about it.
So, you're a lot like TOP?Your favorite person, @TOP, made more than that. I don't hear you saying anything about it.
I am not a faker.So, you're a lot like TOP?
You still made 8 posts in a row,I am not a faker.![]()
Think that's significant compared?You still made 8 posts in a row,
You made the comparison.Think that's significant compared?
Compared to spammers? Why aren't you calling them out?You made the comparison.
You're talking out your ass, Lefty.Compared to spammers? Why aren't you calling them out?
I understand why you refuse to call them out.You're talking out your ass, Lefty.
You suck at logic. Ask me how I know.(formatting altered)
1. This morning on the first page of Current Events are some 20 threads started by the same member.
2. He or she is assuming effective ownership of the site.
Too funny! AProudLefty is arguing that because his own spamming is specifically less than someone else's spamming, that his own spamming is somehow not actually spamming.Think that's significant compared?
Why thank you!Too funny! AProudLefty is arguing that because his own spamming is specifically less than someone else's spamming, that his own spamming is somehow not actually spamming.
AProudLefty is a logical genius. Truly.
You are most welcome. My only hope is that I will be able to bask in the glow of your brilliance, if for but a fleeting moment.Why thank you!
Lay it on me thick.You are most welcome. My only hope is that I will be able to bask in the glow of your brilliance, if for but a fleeting moment.
ThicklyLay it on me thick.
Brilliant!Thickly
Although I originally spoke against limiting the number of threads, I have changed my mind.
Allowing one (or a few) to post an unlimited amount of threads allows solid threads by numerous people to be forced out.