Limpbaugh wants to own an NFL team :0) - Won't happen

Neocons and Rushbo(owl of BS) can jump up and down, fall out on the floor and throw a tantrum all they want....the bottom line is that the CONSERVATIVE owners DID NOT WANT THAT LYING NEOCON POS ANYWHERE NEAR THEM OFFICIALLY? Why? Simple....BUCKS BABY! You've got a LOT of black players in the NFL.....and without them, the NFL COLLAPSES! No one is going to suffer the astronomical financial losses of one or two years because some willfully ignorant bigots want to lap up Limbaughs race baiting bilge in some official capacity (which raises the question, would Limbaugh have lived up to his hype about black players as an owner? Or would he remain true to his lying, hypocritical ways? The world will never know.)

Buck up and move on, neocon parrots. Reality just kicked your hero in the ass...and he has to spit the dirt out of his mouth!
 
Oh, so now you are also the arbiter of what matters and what we should defend too? Motives always matter Damo...always. And unlike you I will defend a man or woman who is having false motives ascribed to them without your permission....or some collective group of people who are nothing more than pc light meadow muffins.
It's an opinion, ID. That's what we do here.
 
Now you want to watch too! Wow, you really are a kinkster! But alas, I am as of yet still happily married and I once again must disappoint you, this makes me sad.

I think one woman witnessing poor performance is enough.

Don't be sad. Your wife loves you anyways.
 
I think one woman witnessing poor performance is enough.

Don't be sad. Your wife loves you anyways.
No matter how much you beg, you won't get me to ask my wife to leave. I know I'm teh sexy... but even so, she's the only one for me.

I'm still sad for you. It always is sad when you reach for the unattainable.
 
Again, the stated reason makes no difference whatsoever in what I have stated. The motivation does not excuse the action, nor does it serve us well to defend it.

There was no wrong action. There was no race-baiting, because his actions don't fit the definition of race-baiting, not because i say so.

Damo, is rush a racist, yes or no?
 
There was no wrong action. There was no race-baiting, because his actions don't fit the definition of race-baiting, not because i say so.

Damo, is rush a racist, yes or no?

Damo has a "Rush Crush". He hasn't been able to get him or begging off his mind for nigh on a week now.

Lends a whole new meaning to "sad".
 
Are you asking me to again paint a picture of those dreams for you? Again I tell you no, madam! This site is not for such depictions.

I don't think anyone, this board, that board, or any bored, would be interested in your wet dreams Damo.

Again I say to you, Daddy. No matter how much you try and stick that little thing out, work yourself in a lather dreaming that women want to see your uhhh...boudoir performance, there are NO TAKERS.

You simply have to "handle" this on your own.

LIHOM
 
I don't think anyone, this board, that board, or any bored, would be interested in your wet dreams Damo.

Again I say to you, Daddy. No matter how much you try and stick that little thing out, work yourself in a lather dreaming that women want to see your uhhh...boudoir performance, there are NO TAKERS.

You simply have to "handle" this on your own.

LIHOM
You were the one who asked. I can even quote it... ;)

I'm sorry if you are taking this more seriously than it is meant. I'll let you off the hook, since you appear to be getting angry.
 
In all fairness, we must still recognize that Damo runs the best forum on the web. I know of no other owner who would take it this long without abusing his mod powers.

Kudos to you, Damocles!
 
In all fairness, we must still recognize that Damo runs the best forum on the web. I know of no other owner who would take it this long without abusing his mod powers.

Kudos to you, Damocles!
True dat. I've been banned on several boards for creaming the moderator.
 
You were the one who asked. I can even quote it... ;)

I'm sorry if you are taking this more seriously than it is meant. I'll let you off the hook, since you appear to be getting angry.

There you go assigning intent to someone's words Damo. I am NOT RUSH!

Honey chile, I ain't getting angry. I am laughing my ass off at you!
 
There you go assigning intent to someone's words Damo. I am NOT RUSH!

Honey chile, I ain't getting angry. I am laughing my ass off at you!
There is a reason why I said "appear" in that sentence.

Good, that was the goal, at least with the "you know you want me" stuff. I'm glad I was successful.

Your remarks appeared to be getting more strident. I didn't want you to get upset at what was supposed to be humorous word-play.
 
There is a reason why I said "appear" in that sentence.

Good, that was the goal, at least with the "you know you want me" stuff. I'm glad I was successful.

Your remarks appeared to be getting more strident. I didn't want you to get upset at what was supposed to be humorous word-play.

Humorous word play? You were SEX-BAITING and you know it!:)
 
There is a reason why I said "appear" in that sentence.

Good, that was the goal, at least with the "you know you want me" stuff. I'm glad I was successful.

Your remarks appeared to be getting more strident. I didn't want you to get upset at what was supposed to be humorous word-play.

Damo. You assign way too much to appearances and what you "feel" someone is saying.

The only thing I believe you abuse is your "daddiness". Very typical of a man who has young children. They tend to "teach, mentor, advise, lecture" as they do their own children. I work with several men who do likewise and basically get the same results you do.

Let me be clear. I do not for one second believe you care one iota about me being upset, happy, glad, or sad. What I feel about it is immaterial.

I will hang in there with the best of them. If you want to make this about fabricated fantasy, I will take the bait and play til I'm bored.
 
Back
Top