Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
No oops, Yurtsie. I asked "how many." We've been attacked a few times; it depends on what you'd like to count. But it works out to about once every 3-4 decades.
So, somehow, the great GW Bush deserves credit for "keeping us safe" after 9/11, because we weren't attacked again for SEVEN years. Not 3-4 decades; 7 years.
The fact is, his actions have made us less safe, at least according to the last few NIE's.
So, he deserves no credit, unless you want to think irrationally.
...so because in the past attacks happen only once in a while then they should only happen once in a while forever....explain WWI and WWII....using your logic we should have never had either as either never happened and when they did only mere decades apart....how can you honestly ignore new threats? what about the iran embassy? never happened before, but it did....why? islamic radicals...
seems you have also forgotten about the attacks in spain, britian and don't forget the one famous case of the guy they caught in seattle, wake up dude...you're being dangerously naive to think AQ had planned only one attack
futher:
if he deserves no credit for no attacks then he deserves no credit for the attacks....you can't have it both ways, that is irrational to think so
you have no clue how many attacks have been thwarted, you think they make every case public knowledge? those NIE's are terrorists threats and according to you we can't take them seriously after all, they are just terrorists....DUH
how can you you claim in a prior post not to take those serious yet NOW claim that bush has made us more unsafe based on reports....yet oddly, no attacks on our soil...