Are u talking about Biden?
Lockdowns had little or no impact on COVID-19 Johns Hopkins University
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
Are u talking about Biden?
I am referring to you nutty friend Thaddeus Martel.
Who's fleeing? I mean, besides Trump??
Incorrect, health care and the economy are top priorities for the American people.
What isn't a priority is banning books.
Where did you look?
Like saying "Trump won the election" when he lost by 8 million votes.
PA, GA, WI, MI, and NH all have Republican State legislators and/or Republican governors.
You lost because you couldn't keep your big, fat mouth shut.
"I want you to find 11,780 votes"
-Donald Trump, January 2, 2021
What a crybaby.
Without showing anything specific, this amounts to nothing more than you screaming at people that you don't WANT their hard science facts to be true. Which means absolute jack shit to anyone. Learn how to debate or go sit at the low-IQ kiddie table.
If assholes like you want to use newspapers like the Washington Times...or "news" networks like FOX...fine with me. They are killing you people off...and fewer of you means better for our Republic.
The data from Johns Hopkins study DOES NOT INDICATE that lockdowns had little or no impact On Covid 19.
Oh...and you are an ignorant piece of shit.
You're accusing Johns Hopkins of excluding other methodologies for some nefarious agenda? Now who's the anti-science conspiracy theorist.
No. Not at all. It is a working paper and the methodologies are not those of John Hopkins who is merely publishing the paper which has not been peer reviewed.
I am accusing the authors one of who is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and a contributor to The National Review of being selective to achieve a desired outcome.
Read the actual report...rather than the headlines from an article by a piece of shit pretend newspaper with an agenda intended to play games with you fucking idiots.
THE JOHNS HOPKINS REPORT DOES NOT DO WHAT THIS THREAD SAYS IT DOES.
It already has. The source of the dossier is under arrest and your tabloid trash "news" sources are in full-scale retreat on every part of it.
Guess you miss that kind of critical information when watching Rachel Maddow.
Way to help us out by bringing up things that show Democrats are the real conspiracy theorists (Russia, Russia, Russia!).
When was Michael Steele arrested? It is called the Steele dossier after all and Michael Steele is the one who compiled it. One of the sources Steele may have used was arrested but that source was not the source of the dossier.
'Overall, we conclude that lockdowns are not an effective way of reducing mortality rates during
a pandemic, at least not during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.'
It is becoming more and more obvious that history will look back at the lockdowns as an unmitigated disaster.
Reducing Covid-19 deaths by little if any.
While costing trillions of dollars and incalculable degrees of suffering.
Not to mention all those whom died directly thanks to the lockdowns through suicides, lack of healthcare for serious illnesses/conditions and other reasons.
a pandemic, at least not during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.'
It is becoming more and more obvious that history will look back at the lockdowns as an unmitigated disaster.
Reducing Covid-19 deaths by little if any.
While costing trillions of dollars and incalculable degrees of suffering.
Not to mention all those whom died directly thanks to the lockdowns through suicides, lack of healthcare for serious illnesses/conditions and other reasons.
Last edited:
danielpalos
Verified User
Only right-wingers claim that. How quickly y'all forget the refrigerated trucks they had to use to hold all of the bodies. Sure, we could have responded better but right-wingers being anti-mask and anti-vaxx even today doesn't help the situation or the study and someone should recommend they take that into account in future economic studies.
Yes it does.
From the report (just one example):
'Overall, we conclude that lockdowns are not an effective way of reducing mortality rates during
a pandemic, at least not during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.'
Last edited:
And you suppose that means: LOCKDOWNS HAD LITTLE OR NO IMPACT ON COVID 19?
Are you people fucking brain dead...or are you merely morbidly stupid?
You typed: 'THE JOHNS HOPKINS REPORT DOES NOT DO WHAT THIS THREAD SAYS IT DOES.'
Read the OP again...'The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by about 0.2%, said the broad review of multiple scientific studies.
“We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality,” the researchers wrote.
How can the thread OP NOT say what the report said when it is quoting WHAT the report said?
DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And how exactly can - by definition of the words - someone be 'morbidly stupid'?
It's pretty obvious that you have no idea what 'morbidly' even means.
Last edited:
So...you think that the same rate of Covid mortality is same as "...had little or no impact on Covid."
Okay...you don't sound too bright, so I will chalk it up to that.
Get someone from your class...or ask the teacher nicely...to explain the difference.
Jesus H. Christ!
I will make it even simpler for you....
'We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality,”'
Does that mean that the lockdowns made NO, appreciable difference to Covid-19 mortality?
True or False?
I cannot fault your logic.
You are referring to the same poster, just a few of his numerous pseudonyms, that is when they get humorous, when he imports one to support the other, can't say it enough, "copy and paste" is entertaining, the key component of this forum
I kinda suspected that this is a sock.
Oh I dont know....there is also getting us to not say truth that they dont want spoken and getting us to say lies that we know are lies while claiming it is the truth...which is where America is now.
"COMPLY OR GET HURT!"