Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
But I provided you a link to peer reviewed data, Are you blind? (don't asnwer, that's a rhetorical question.).there is no peer reviewed testable evidence for macro-evolution.....
But I provided you a link to peer reviewed data, Are you blind? (don't asnwer, that's a rhetorical question.).there is no peer reviewed testable evidence for macro-evolution.....
No matter how much data we heap in front of you'll continue to raise the bar as to the burdon of proof as to what constitutes evidence of macro-evolution.
perhaps its because I'm looking at this as a lawyer would.....when opposing counsel tries to argue that the fact my client was standing on the sidewalk outside the store proves he was the robber I'm inclined to point out that no, it only proves he was standing outside the store.....where is your evidence refuting the data I presented to you
But I provided you a link to peer reviewed data, Are you blind? (don't asnwer, that's a rhetorical question.).
in your opinion.....the whale likes it.....
It's not a style choice, chickenshit.
no, its a judgment choice.....
The whale did not choose to have an arm common to mammals. It is obviously due to common descent.
Why did the designer make this judgment choice? Why not make a mammal that can fly or lives in the water without the underlying mammalian limbs?
Certainly, when you reject science for magic and superstition, you can answer "just because." That is not proof. You can't offer proof because you reject a world where proof can exist for one of magic. Again, it is not useful. It is not science. It is a ridiculous theology for intellectual chickenshits.
Why not make a mammal that can fly or lives in the water without the underlying mammalian limbs?
/facepalm......its a judgment choice as to whether you think its sub-optimal or not.....I am assuming both the whale and the Creator are satisfied....apparently, you think you could have done better.....quite frankly, I suspect you'd still be trying to figure out how to jumpstart that first amoeba.......
so now they're sub-optimal because they don't have jet propulsion up their ass?.....
of course it is....another observer may conclude they are perfectly suited for their purpose....a whale's fin has sufficient rigidity yet flexibility......because it has a jointed skeletal structure.....is it suboptimal or perfect?.....Suboptimal is not a judgement choice. They contain superfluous complexity.
of course it is....another observer may conclude they are perfectly suited for their purpose....a whale's fin has sufficient rigidity yet flexibility......because it has a jointed skeletal structure.....is it suboptimal or perfect?.....
It's suboptimal because it contains superfluous complexity. It has become suited to its task through evolution. But a designer could have done it without the need to rely on the inherited mammalian structure.... chickenshit!
I wonder....do you consider a cuttlefish's skin to be superfluous complexity?.....or was it just more shit happening.....
it has just the right amount of complexity......you want to think its superfluous......it was created suited its task.....your dissatisfaction does not make it ill suited......
No, that's not even a good analogy.
It's been explained to you several times, moron, suboptimal does not mean ill suited.
dude, its not an analogy......its the actual thing.....how do you explain the evolutionary trail of a creature that does something extraordinarily different than any other creature on the planet.....
how do you explain the evolutionary trail of a thing like the butterfly.....insects that spend half their life as a winged creature and half their life as a crawling creature......were they evolving from flight or towards it?......if it survives better as one, why does it spend half its life as the other.......
nope, it simply means you think you could do it better.......when in reality, you couldn't even begin to do it.....
Where is another animal in its line that has repurposed this trait?
The purpose of science is not to disprove the Great Chicken, chickenshit.