so the problem isn't the randomness, but the sheerness......since you think you see what causes the change, and can (admittedly after the fact) "predict" the change you argue it isn't "sheer random chance".....I guess its visible random chance instead......
No, dumbass. I have made myself perfectly clear and there is no need for you restate other than to create a strawman. There are factors that happen by chance and factors that are causal. Over time the causal factors play a bigger role which can give the appearance of design.
Listen chickenshit... if you want to admit causation plays a role then we can forego your attempts to slime your way out of it with your usual spineless semantic games. But then that does not explain this thread.
shit happens but it happens a lot better when it is caused.....
You are so stupid. You meant to say "... better when it is designed." Cause could apply to either explanation.
You don't have a clue about what you are criticizing. Among those that reproduce sexually, speciation does not happen in one individual it happens among a population. Really, you should do a little research and quit making an ass of yourself.
lol....no evolution is NOT "caused".....evolution is sheer random chance.....
Clearly you were trying to claim that evolution leaves no room for causation and happens by nothing other than (or sheer) random chance.