Looks like Comey will get a cellmate

Teflon Don

Teflon Don

I'm back baby
Those who are paying attention know that January 6th was a Fedsurrection

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: CHRIS WRAY LIED UNDER OATH! FBI Had 274 Plainclothes Agents in the Crowd on January 6th - IT WAS A TOTAL FEDSURRECTION | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

It appears that James Comey could have a familiar cellmate when he is finally sent to prison for lying under oath to Congress and the American people.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

If I am not mistaken, lying under oath to Congress is a crime is it not? And leftists have told us for YEARS that "Nobody is above the law"


Now cue JPP leftists criticizing the source as it gives them permission to keep their collective heads in the sand.
 
Teflon Don said:
Those who are paying attention know that January 6th was a Fedsurrection

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: CHRIS WRAY LIED UNDER OATH! FBI Had 274 Plainclothes Agents in the Crowd on January 6th - IT WAS A TOTAL FEDSURRECTION | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

It appears that James Comey could have a familiar cellmate when he is finally sent to prison for lying under oath to Congress and the American people.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

If I am not mistaken, lying under oath to Congress is a crime is it not? And leftists have told us for YEARS that "Nobody is above the law"


Now cue JPP leftists criticizing the source as it gives them permission to keep their collective heads in the sand.
Click to expand...
Gateway = FAKE NEWS

Duplicate your “news” using a legitimate source
 
Only an idiot thinks you can get a jury past this investigations findings and to a point they have no reasonable doubt in what ends up being a He Said, He Said fight.

The fact a top gov't body investigated and affirmed Comey's position while saying their were doubts about McCabes makes this a dead letter.

No jury can throw that out and say 'we have no doubts... the IG just got it all wrong', when he said, she said type cases are already the toughest to prosecute even without such a key GOv't finding favoring you.

But idiot magats gonna idiot magat.


------------------


AI Summary of Inspector General Investigation:

  • McCabe authorized two FBI officials to speak with a reporter for The Wall Street Journal regarding the investigation; however, McCabe later denied or minimized this authorization in various statements. Politico+3CNBC+3The Washington Post+3
  • McCabe “Lacked candor” on multiple occasions:
    • With Comey (his boss) when asked if he had authorized disclosure; he gave an account that led Comey to believe McCabe wasn’t involved. Politico+1
    • With internal FBI/DOJ/IG investigators—including under oath—about his awareness and involvement. Vox+3CBS News+3The Washington Post+3
  • The report determined that Comey’s account was more credible than McCabe’s where their stories diverged. The IG found that “the overwhelming weight of the evidence” supported Comey’s version in key respects. Politico+2CNBC+2
  • The authorization to the media (via the two officials McCabe approved) was found to have violated policy, primarily because of how and when the disclosure was made and McCabe’s representations regarding it. CNBC+2The Washington Post+2
  • McCabe changed his story over time: initially some denials of knowledge / authorization; later admissions or partial acknowledgments.
 
QP! said:
Only an idiot thinks you can get a jury past this investigations findings and to a point they have no reasonable doubt in what ends up being a He Said, He Said fight.

The fact a top gov't body investigated and affirmed Comey's position while saying their were doubts about McCabes makes this a dead letter.

No jury can throw that out and say 'we have no doubts... the IG just got it all wrong', when he said, she said type cases are already the toughest to prosecute even without such a key GOv't finding favoring you.

But idiot magats gonna idiot magat.


------------------


AI Summary of Inspector General Investigation:

  • McCabe authorized two FBI officials to speak with a reporter for The Wall Street Journal regarding the investigation; however, McCabe later denied or minimized this authorization in various statements. Politico+3CNBC+3The Washington Post+3
  • McCabe “Lacked candor” on multiple occasions:
    • With Comey (his boss) when asked if he had authorized disclosure; he gave an account that led Comey to believe McCabe wasn’t involved. Politico+1
    • With internal FBI/DOJ/IG investigators—including under oath—about his awareness and involvement. Vox+3CBS News+3The Washington Post+3
  • The report determined that Comey’s account was more credible than McCabe’s where their stories diverged. The IG found that “the overwhelming weight of the evidence” supported Comey’s version in key respects. Politico+2CNBC+2
  • The authorization to the media (via the two officials McCabe approved) was found to have violated policy, primarily because of how and when the disclosure was made and McCabe’s representations regarding it. CNBC+2The Washington Post+2
  • McCabe changed his story over time: initially some denials of knowledge / authorization; later admissions or partial acknowledgments.
Click to expand...
"AI summary" mean you=tard.
 
Teflon Don said:
Those who are paying attention know that January 6th was a Fedsurrection

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: CHRIS WRAY LIED UNDER OATH! FBI Had 274 Plainclothes Agents in the Crowd on January 6th - IT WAS A TOTAL FEDSURRECTION | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

It appears that James Comey could have a familiar cellmate when he is finally sent to prison for lying under oath to Congress and the American people.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

If I am not mistaken, lying under oath to Congress is a crime is it not? And leftists have told us for YEARS that "Nobody is above the law"


Now cue JPP leftists criticizing the source as it gives them permission to keep their collective heads in the sand.
Click to expand...
They are not going to jail. You are always mistaken.
 
Teflon Don said:
Those who are paying attention know that January 6th was a Fedsurrection

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: CHRIS WRAY LIED UNDER OATH! FBI Had 274 Plainclothes Agents in the Crowd on January 6th - IT WAS A TOTAL FEDSURRECTION | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

It appears that James Comey could have a familiar cellmate when he is finally sent to prison for lying under oath to Congress and the American people.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

If I am not mistaken, lying under oath to Congress is a crime is it not? And leftists have told us for YEARS that "Nobody is above the law"


Now cue JPP leftists criticizing the source as it gives them permission to keep their collective heads in the sand.
Click to expand...
If a jury finds he is guilty and the sentencing guidelines call for jail, he should go to jail.
 
The Gateway Pundit (TGP), an American far-right website founded in 2004 by Jim Hoft, publishes falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories. Described as a source of viral falsehoods and "fake news" by multiple sources, TGP, a multi-employee operation supported by advertising, promotes extreme right-wing viewpoints
 
Beyond what i cited above this is also key. If this is based on the Congress testimony to Ted Cruz's question, which it appears to be people need to note the following.

Note that McCabe has stated he told Comey AFTER he released it and that COmey was OK with his action once informed. THAT IS NOT the same as Comey AUTHORIZING the release.

So on its face Comey and McCabe agree.





AI Summary:
Andrew McCabe claimed that he informed James Comey after he had authorized the leak to The Wall Street Journal — not before.



🔍 Breakdown of Their Conflicting Accounts:​


🗣️​


  • McCabe authorized the leak in late October 2016 (specifically Oct. 30) via his special counsel and an aide.
  • He later claimed that he told Comey afterward about the authorization.
  • McCabe has said this was standard practice and that Comey was informed after the fact, not in advance.

In McCabe’s telling, the disclosure was “cleared internally,” and he followed up with Comey after it happened to explain the context.
Click to expand...


------------------------------

AI Summary:

Here’s a summary of the key Ted Cruz question to James Comey (in a Senate hearing) that is often cited as central to the McCabe/Comey leak dispute:



🔍 The Question by Ted Cruz​


  • Cruz reminded Comey that in May 2017, under questioning by Senator Chuck Grassley, Comey had testified under oath:

    “Have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?”
    → Comey answered: “Never.”
    “Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports ...?”
    → Comey answered: “No.” cruz.senate.gov+2Washington Examiner+2
    Click to expand...
  • Cruz then confronted Comey with Andrew McCabe’s public and repeated claims that McCabe had been a source for The Wall Street Journal and that Comey had been aware of it or had authorized it. Washington Examiner+2Fox News+2
  • Cruz framed it like this:

    “Now, what Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to cannot both be true. One or the other is false. Who’s telling the truth?” Fox News+3MRCTV+3cruz.senate.gov+3
    Click to expand...
  • And he also asked:

    “So your testimony is you’ve never authorized anyone to leak? And Mr. McCabe, if he says the contrary, is he not telling the truth?”
    → Comey declined to characterize McCabe’s testimony as false, but said he stood by his own testimony. MRCTV+3wkjc.com+3cruz.senate.gov+3
    Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top