Looks like Mueller has been busy!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Very interesting!
Go Mueller, GO!
Let's see Trump in the hot seat.
Go Mueller, GO!
Let's see Trump in the hot seat.
Translation, dammit Jarod beat me again.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Kill yourself.
Superfreak
Verified User
No Garud, you proved you were an idiot again. There were not facts, just a lot of guesses. Period.
L M F A O He hasn't been subpoenaed you willful low IQ dunce.
Nothing to see here but a lot of speculative baloney snowflake. It is hard to take your stupidity seriously anymore. More bad news for idiots like you; Presidents cannot be subpoenaed to testify without a criminal causation. What criminal act do you think Muehller can bring down on Trump?
What a shocker for an ambulance chasing loser lawyer like you eh?
But now, thanks to Politico’s reporting (backed up by the simple gumshoe move of sitting in the clerk’s office waiting to see who walks in and requests what file), we might know what Mueller has been up to: Since mid-August, he may have been locked in proceedings with Trump and his lawyers over a grand jury subpoena—in secret litigation that could tell us by December whether the president will testify before Mueller’s grand jury.
Another prediction snowflake? Did Democrats win already? It isn't the 6th yet. Did I miss something?
What facts have been presented snowflake? The fact that you're a dishonest, hyper partisan dumbass?
Nothing to say about Mr. Sekulow's rebuttal, Brad?
There were no facts in that speculative pile of wishful thinking bile Brad. Try to extract your head from your asshole; your tiny brain could use some oxygen.
Brad is lying again; he claimed the President had been subpoenaed to testify. Why do you think Brad lies so much?
The fact that papers were filed with a court is not a fact?
Because he's a hyper-partisan DEMOCRAT?
The fact that the Court entered a scheduling order is not a fact?
The fact that an order was issued is not a fact?
The fact that the order was appealed is not a fact?
The fact that an en banc hearing was requested is not a fact?
I think it is pathological; look at how often he lies. Every thread he starts seems to be based on a lie. When exposed, he runs away like the coward we know him to be.
Where were any papers filed in court Brad? That isn't what your story said Brad. Why the lies Brad?
From your source Brad:
We cannot know, from the brief docket entries that are available to us in this sealed case, that the matter involves Trump.
