Now to the United States. The DOE reports data (FY 2013) for a variety of government support, including R&D funds, which make up more than 10% of the total ($3.4 billion out of $29), an amount that I consider inadequate. Over half of the total goes to renewables, of which $1.8 billion is for biofuels (read ethanol), largely a waste IMHO. Renewable electricity gets $13 billion, compared to $3.4 billion for fossil fuels and $1.7 billion for nuclear.
But to paraphrase Yogi Berra, if you have a numerator and a denominator, divide ‘em. The absolute amounts of subsidies are less interesting than the relative amounts, which show what we get for our money. In the table below, calculated from DOE data for 2013, I have used the simple level of subsidies and production by source, which is not completely accurate since it doesn’t deal with capacity. But the differences are so enormous as to overwhelm any methodological questions.
Relative subsidies (where coal equals 1)
Coal 1
Petroleum 1
Nuclear 4
Renewables 27
Wind 69
Solar 326