MAGA insurrection leader denied bail, let him rot with the other filth

I hope the fuck suffers every second he's in lock up, fuck him and all the other Trumpist traitors


Elmer Stewart Rhodes, head of the extremist Oath Keepers group, was ordered to remain in custody Friday after a federal judge found he poses a dangerous threat to the American public and should await his July trial for seditious conspiracy behind bars.

Poring over the evidence from federal prosecutors for more than an hour, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta was unconvinced Rhodes should be released given his sophistication with covert communication, his access to weapons, and among other things, the backlog of communications where he appeared to have a total lack of remorse over fellow “patriots” storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Rhodes is currently being held at the Cimarron Prison and Correctional Facility in Oklahoma. Prosecutors asked that he stay there until his trial in Washington this summer. U.S. Attorney Katherine Rakoczy said there was serious concern that if Rhodes is transferred to the prison in Washington—where other Jan. 6 defendants are currently being held—sensitive discovery materials had the potential to be jeopardized.

Defense attorney Phillip Linder asked for the transfer, arguing it would be difficult for Rhodes to communicate with his attorneys and prepare at such distance.

Judge Mehta said he sympathized but nonetheless, the circumstantial evidence of Rhodes’ case overruled the inconvenience.

Rhodes's virtual appearance Friday was initially scheduled to take place in the early afternoon but was unexpectedly disrupted after a power outage forced a lost connection between Judge Mehta’s bench in Washington and the live feed from Oklahoma. Mehta resumed the hearing on Friday just after 5 PM.

He picked up where the court left off: a review of the charges.

Indicted in January, the seditious conspiracy charge for the 57-year-old longtime Oath Keeper is among the most serious to be brought by the Justice Department yet.

The list of allegations against Rhodes is long. Prosecutors say Rhodes oversaw a sweeping, weaponized effort to lay siege to the Capitol and obstruct the transfer of power from outgoing President Donald Trump to President-elect Joe Biden.

He oversaw the orchestration of quick-force reaction teams that crossed state lines, ultimately ending up at a northern Virginia hotel and positioning themselves just minutes outside of Washington with their weapons cache so Oath Keepers could be called up to the Capitol at a moment’s notice.

Rhodes claims that the guns and teams stashed in Virginia were there just in case Trump invoked the Insurrection Act and needed Oath Keepers to assist.

“There are a number of [statements] Mr. Rhodes makes before and after Jan. 6 that run counter to the notion that they were simply waiting on the president to invoke the Insurrection Act and once it happened, the intention he had dissipated and he was no longer a threat."

Further messages or remarks after Jan. 6 showed Rhodes expressing a willingness to stop Biden’s “illegitimate regime.”

Mehta reiterated Friday that it would ultimately be up to a jury to decide his guilt or innocence. But the circumstantial evidence in Rhodes’ case ruled out any shot he had at escaping pretrial detention.

The judge, appointed by former President Barack Obama, also excoriated the suggestion by Rhodes that he was not at all aware that fellow Oath Keeper and defendant Kelly Meggs intended to breach the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Previously covert communications revealed by prosecutors on discovery showed time and again how Oath Keepers like Edward Vallejo were loyal to Rhodes, checking in with him frequently or asking his permission for various tasks.

The “evidence is strong to believe,” Mehta said, that Rhodes knew Meggs was going to breach the Capitol and likely did so on his command.

“These are not people who do things without orders. They certainly don't do things with such significance, like entering the Capitol, without an order from their commanding officer. That may turn out to be the wrong inference but it certainly is reasonable,” Mehta said.

~ dkos
 
I hope the fuck suffers every second he's in lock up, fuck him and all the other Trumpist traitors


Elmer Stewart Rhodes, head of the extremist Oath Keepers group, was ordered to remain in custody Friday after a federal judge found he poses a dangerous threat to the American public and should await his July trial for seditious conspiracy behind bars.

Poring over the evidence from federal prosecutors for more than an hour, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta was unconvinced Rhodes should be released given his sophistication with covert communication, his access to weapons, and among other things, the backlog of communications where he appeared to have a total lack of remorse over fellow “patriots” storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Rhodes is currently being held at the Cimarron Prison and Correctional Facility in Oklahoma. Prosecutors asked that he stay there until his trial in Washington this summer. U.S. Attorney Katherine Rakoczy said there was serious concern that if Rhodes is transferred to the prison in Washington—where other Jan. 6 defendants are currently being held—sensitive discovery materials had the potential to be jeopardized.

Defense attorney Phillip Linder asked for the transfer, arguing it would be difficult for Rhodes to communicate with his attorneys and prepare at such distance.

Judge Mehta said he sympathized but nonetheless, the circumstantial evidence of Rhodes’ case overruled the inconvenience.

Rhodes's virtual appearance Friday was initially scheduled to take place in the early afternoon but was unexpectedly disrupted after a power outage forced a lost connection between Judge Mehta’s bench in Washington and the live feed from Oklahoma. Mehta resumed the hearing on Friday just after 5 PM.

He picked up where the court left off: a review of the charges.

Indicted in January, the seditious conspiracy charge for the 57-year-old longtime Oath Keeper is among the most serious to be brought by the Justice Department yet.

The list of allegations against Rhodes is long. Prosecutors say Rhodes oversaw a sweeping, weaponized effort to lay siege to the Capitol and obstruct the transfer of power from outgoing President Donald Trump to President-elect Joe Biden.

He oversaw the orchestration of quick-force reaction teams that crossed state lines, ultimately ending up at a northern Virginia hotel and positioning themselves just minutes outside of Washington with their weapons cache so Oath Keepers could be called up to the Capitol at a moment’s notice.

Rhodes claims that the guns and teams stashed in Virginia were there just in case Trump invoked the Insurrection Act and needed Oath Keepers to assist.

“There are a number of [statements] Mr. Rhodes makes before and after Jan. 6 that run counter to the notion that they were simply waiting on the president to invoke the Insurrection Act and once it happened, the intention he had dissipated and he was no longer a threat."

Further messages or remarks after Jan. 6 showed Rhodes expressing a willingness to stop Biden’s “illegitimate regime.”

Mehta reiterated Friday that it would ultimately be up to a jury to decide his guilt or innocence. But the circumstantial evidence in Rhodes’ case ruled out any shot he had at escaping pretrial detention.

The judge, appointed by former President Barack Obama, also excoriated the suggestion by Rhodes that he was not at all aware that fellow Oath Keeper and defendant Kelly Meggs intended to breach the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Previously covert communications revealed by prosecutors on discovery showed time and again how Oath Keepers like Edward Vallejo were loyal to Rhodes, checking in with him frequently or asking his permission for various tasks.

The “evidence is strong to believe,” Mehta said, that Rhodes knew Meggs was going to breach the Capitol and likely did so on his command.

“These are not people who do things without orders. They certainly don't do things with such significance, like entering the Capitol, without an order from their commanding officer. That may turn out to be the wrong inference but it certainly is reasonable,” Mehta said.

~ dkos
"Stand down, and stand by"
 
I hope the fuck suffers every second he's in lock up, fuck him and all the other Trumpist traitors


Elmer Stewart Rhodes, head of the extremist Oath Keepers group, was ordered to remain in custody Friday after a federal judge found he poses a dangerous threat to the American public and should await his July trial for seditious conspiracy behind bars.

Poring over the evidence from federal prosecutors for more than an hour, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta was unconvinced Rhodes should be released given his sophistication with covert communication, his access to weapons, and among other things, the backlog of communications where he appeared to have a total lack of remorse over fellow “patriots” storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Rhodes is currently being held at the Cimarron Prison and Correctional Facility in Oklahoma. Prosecutors asked that he stay there until his trial in Washington this summer. U.S. Attorney Katherine Rakoczy said there was serious concern that if Rhodes is transferred to the prison in Washington—where other Jan. 6 defendants are currently being held—sensitive discovery materials had the potential to be jeopardized.

Defense attorney Phillip Linder asked for the transfer, arguing it would be difficult for Rhodes to communicate with his attorneys and prepare at such distance.

Judge Mehta said he sympathized but nonetheless, the circumstantial evidence of Rhodes’ case overruled the inconvenience.

Rhodes's virtual appearance Friday was initially scheduled to take place in the early afternoon but was unexpectedly disrupted after a power outage forced a lost connection between Judge Mehta’s bench in Washington and the live feed from Oklahoma. Mehta resumed the hearing on Friday just after 5 PM.

He picked up where the court left off: a review of the charges.

Indicted in January, the seditious conspiracy charge for the 57-year-old longtime Oath Keeper is among the most serious to be brought by the Justice Department yet.

The list of allegations against Rhodes is long. Prosecutors say Rhodes oversaw a sweeping, weaponized effort to lay siege to the Capitol and obstruct the transfer of power from outgoing President Donald Trump to President-elect Joe Biden.

He oversaw the orchestration of quick-force reaction teams that crossed state lines, ultimately ending up at a northern Virginia hotel and positioning themselves just minutes outside of Washington with their weapons cache so Oath Keepers could be called up to the Capitol at a moment’s notice.

Rhodes claims that the guns and teams stashed in Virginia were there just in case Trump invoked the Insurrection Act and needed Oath Keepers to assist.

“There are a number of [statements] Mr. Rhodes makes before and after Jan. 6 that run counter to the notion that they were simply waiting on the president to invoke the Insurrection Act and once it happened, the intention he had dissipated and he was no longer a threat."

Further messages or remarks after Jan. 6 showed Rhodes expressing a willingness to stop Biden’s “illegitimate regime.”

Mehta reiterated Friday that it would ultimately be up to a jury to decide his guilt or innocence. But the circumstantial evidence in Rhodes’ case ruled out any shot he had at escaping pretrial detention.

The judge, appointed by former President Barack Obama, also excoriated the suggestion by Rhodes that he was not at all aware that fellow Oath Keeper and defendant Kelly Meggs intended to breach the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Previously covert communications revealed by prosecutors on discovery showed time and again how Oath Keepers like Edward Vallejo were loyal to Rhodes, checking in with him frequently or asking his permission for various tasks.

The “evidence is strong to believe,” Mehta said, that Rhodes knew Meggs was going to breach the Capitol and likely did so on his command.

“These are not people who do things without orders. They certainly don't do things with such significance, like entering the Capitol, without an order from their commanding officer. That may turn out to be the wrong inference but it certainly is reasonable,” Mehta said.

~ dkos

Meanwhile, a piece of shit motherfucker from Black Lives Matter, the terrorist organization, shot at and attempted to assassinate a person running for mayor and got a measly 100k bail, which the fucking little cunts at BLM promptly raised money for and freed him.
 
I would hate to be the one that is having my case heard by Judge Amit Mehta for anything vaguely related to Trump, or Jan 6. This asshole of a judge, appointed by Barack Obama, has repeatedly foisted his personal and political opinions on these two issues tainting any possibility he's being objective about either. He frequently injects conjecture, and opinion into his rulings on both. Mehta often relies on circumstantial and vague, questionable evidence to make his rulings.
 
Meanwhile, a piece of shit motherfucker from Black Lives Matter, the terrorist organization, shot at and attempted to assassinate a person running for mayor and got a measly 100k bail, which the fucking little cunts at BLM promptly raised money for and freed him.

Oh great, just what this forum needs -- yet another drooling racist MAGAT who can't tell the difference between a social justice march and a terrorist attack on our Capitol meant to overturn an American election. :rolleyes:
 
Hello reagansghost,

I hope the fuck suffers every second he's in lock up, fuck him and all the other Trumpist traitors


Elmer Stewart Rhodes, head of the extremist Oath Keepers group, was ordered to remain in custody Friday after a federal judge found he poses a dangerous threat to the American public and should await his July trial for seditious conspiracy behind bars.

Poring over the evidence from federal prosecutors for more than an hour, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta was unconvinced Rhodes should be released given his sophistication with covert communication, his access to weapons, and among other things, the backlog of communications where he appeared to have a total lack of remorse over fellow “patriots” storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Rhodes is currently being held at the Cimarron Prison and Correctional Facility in Oklahoma. Prosecutors asked that he stay there until his trial in Washington this summer. U.S. Attorney Katherine Rakoczy said there was serious concern that if Rhodes is transferred to the prison in Washington—where other Jan. 6 defendants are currently being held—sensitive discovery materials had the potential to be jeopardized.

Defense attorney Phillip Linder asked for the transfer, arguing it would be difficult for Rhodes to communicate with his attorneys and prepare at such distance.

Judge Mehta said he sympathized but nonetheless, the circumstantial evidence of Rhodes’ case overruled the inconvenience.

Rhodes's virtual appearance Friday was initially scheduled to take place in the early afternoon but was unexpectedly disrupted after a power outage forced a lost connection between Judge Mehta’s bench in Washington and the live feed from Oklahoma. Mehta resumed the hearing on Friday just after 5 PM.

He picked up where the court left off: a review of the charges.

Indicted in January, the seditious conspiracy charge for the 57-year-old longtime Oath Keeper is among the most serious to be brought by the Justice Department yet.

The list of allegations against Rhodes is long. Prosecutors say Rhodes oversaw a sweeping, weaponized effort to lay siege to the Capitol and obstruct the transfer of power from outgoing President Donald Trump to President-elect Joe Biden.

He oversaw the orchestration of quick-force reaction teams that crossed state lines, ultimately ending up at a northern Virginia hotel and positioning themselves just minutes outside of Washington with their weapons cache so Oath Keepers could be called up to the Capitol at a moment’s notice.

Rhodes claims that the guns and teams stashed in Virginia were there just in case Trump invoked the Insurrection Act and needed Oath Keepers to assist.

“There are a number of [statements] Mr. Rhodes makes before and after Jan. 6 that run counter to the notion that they were simply waiting on the president to invoke the Insurrection Act and once it happened, the intention he had dissipated and he was no longer a threat."

Further messages or remarks after Jan. 6 showed Rhodes expressing a willingness to stop Biden’s “illegitimate regime.”

Mehta reiterated Friday that it would ultimately be up to a jury to decide his guilt or innocence. But the circumstantial evidence in Rhodes’ case ruled out any shot he had at escaping pretrial detention.

The judge, appointed by former President Barack Obama, also excoriated the suggestion by Rhodes that he was not at all aware that fellow Oath Keeper and defendant Kelly Meggs intended to breach the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Previously covert communications revealed by prosecutors on discovery showed time and again how Oath Keepers like Edward Vallejo were loyal to Rhodes, checking in with him frequently or asking his permission for various tasks.

The “evidence is strong to believe,” Mehta said, that Rhodes knew Meggs was going to breach the Capitol and likely did so on his command.

“These are not people who do things without orders. They certainly don't do things with such significance, like entering the Capitol, without an order from their commanding officer. That may turn out to be the wrong inference but it certainly is reasonable,” Mehta said.

~ dkos

Deep do-do gettin stinky for that seditionist.

He is a threat to America. Americans can be glad this threat is locked up.
 
The cool thing is that one of his underlings DEFINITELY flipped on him.

I have no doubt several are flipping on each other. These idiots lived a fantasy for decades and now reality is setting in: Life in prison or flip for a lighter sentence.
 
Oh great, just what this forum needs -- yet another drooling racist MAGAT who can't tell the difference between a social justice march and a terrorist attack on our Capitol meant to overturn an American election. :rolleyes:

First, odds are good he's a sock so the number of idiots didn't increase. :)

Second, the more highly vocal racist idiots who side with the Republicans express their violent racist beliefs, the more Americans will dislike the White Supremacist version of the New Republican Party.
 
judges like this pose a dangerous threat to the American public......I know he's only been around since Obama appointed him and he's never been a judge before, but are there any statistics yet for how often he's been overturned?........
 
Last edited:
Oh great, just what this forum needs -- yet another drooling racist MAGAT who can't tell the difference between a social justice march and a terrorist attack on our Capitol meant to overturn an American election. :rolleyes:

Oh, social justice marches involve attempted assassination of mayoral candidates now? Huh, when the fuck did that happen you stupid cunt?
 
First, odds are good he's a sock so the number of idiots didn't increase. :)

Second, the more highly vocal racist idiots who side with the Republicans express their violent racist beliefs, the more Americans will dislike the White Supremacist version of the New Republican Party.

Where did I say anything violently racist, you dumb fuck? A BLM leader attempted to assassinate a mayoral candidate, and then BLM bailed him out of jail the next day, you stupid twat.
 
judges like this pose a dangerous threat to the American public......I know he's only been around since Obama appointed him and he's never been a judge before, but are there any statistics yet for how often he's been overturned?........

But you all are okay with "activist judges" who rule the approved Reichwing way. Why's that?
 
Where did I say anything violently racist, you dumb fuck? A BLM leader attempted to assassinate a mayoral candidate, and then BLM bailed him out of jail the next day, you stupid twat.

If you were honest you'd just go ahead and tell everyone your other account name.

OTOH, I like puzzles and if you were really not a sock, you'd hang around for more then 100+ posts before disappearing for months. Sock users use their socks. Some do it sparing and will very little chit-chat, others use their sock(s) a lot. Since the GLand sock is rarely used, I'm guessing it's a 3 or lower sock of the lying, racist cocksucker using it.

All in good fun, eh? :laugh:
 
Ah, the c-word, hallmark of the Incel. You lose. Dismissed.

That was easy. :laugh:

Agreed. Not just that, but the later "stupid twat". Off hand I'm thinking he's that dumbfuck Aussie. The bogan.

If he keeps posting and not run away, I'll try to puzzle it out. It's like a forum Turing Test exercise but instead of bots it's determining gender* and socks. LOL


5bngv4.jpg



*usually it's women masquerading as men in a male dominated arena. Sometimes it's a Bruce Jenner which indicates something about the puppet master.
 
Back
Top