I was given a lot of flack by proles on this site like Yurt and PMP and butthurt embarrassed Republicans like Damo for statistically inferring that it was unlikely that most Republicans weren't creationist. Now there's hard number proving that you belong to the party of idiocy, fucking idiots.
Major link failure
I was given a lot of flack by proles on this site like Yurt and PMP and butthurt embarrassed Republicans like Damo for statistically inferring that it was unlikely that most Republicans weren't creationist. Now there's hard number proving that you belong to the party of idiocy, fucking idiots.
a shame you decided not to share that with us....
no problem though, I found it.....
http://www.gallup.com/poll/145286/Four-Americans-Believe-Strict-Creationism.aspx
unfortunately, the dimwitted pollsters only gave the respondents three possible choices and asked which was closest to what they believed....hard to tell then whether they chose the option because of the "God created" or the "10,000 years"......though it should be obvious that WM's conclusion based on the actual data would be wrong.....and that we should continue to give him flack.....
I did find it interesting that only 8% of Republicans and 20% of Democrats believed that God played no part in the process....apparently atheists are only about twice as likely to be Democrats as Republicans....
Why is that Skidmark? I mean first, creationism, from a scientific standpoint, is an empty bag of wind. It makes no useful predictions that can be tested or independently verified so there's not really a whole hell of a lot a Biologist can do with it even if they were inclined to do so. From a practical scientific stand point it's useless and provides no scientific value.
The only thing 3D supports is cheap beer and free pussy (or is that free beer and cheap pussy? I get confused about that 3D).
I have to agree with you. The pollsters questions were phrased terribly and that impacts the results and that based on the wordings of that poll the pollsters understood neither biological evolution nor creationism. One does not have to believe that the world sprang magically into existence 10,000 years ago to be a Creationist and whenever I hear the "life evolved from a lower form" comment in the context of evolutionary theory, I know I'm dealing with someone who does not understand evolutionary theory as biological evolution is not a linear concept, that is, it's not directional.
I was given a lot of flack by proles on this site like Yurt and PMP and butthurt embarrassed Republicans like Damo for statistically inferring that it was unlikely that most Republicans weren't creationist. Now there's hard number proving that you belong to the party of idiocy, fucking idiots.
